© Off-Guardian
The conversation has gone in two predictable directions.
On the one hand you have the predictable "out pouring of support" from fans of Team Blue, "liberal" journalists and celebrities.
On the other hand you have cynical commentary from Team Red, questioning the timing of the announcement and wondering how someone with such a high profile and (presumably) first class medical care could have cancer missed until such a late stage.
A third, quieter, option is to suggest a connection between this cancer and the Covid "vaccine". (A possibility I reject out of hand, becasue I don't believe there is any chance at all he was really given the experimental shot.)
But all of these conversations miss the point.
The question is not "what caused Biden's cancer?" or "why did they cover up Biden's cancer?" it's "why are they telling us Biden has cancer?"
Remember, the same media reporting "Biden has cancer" spent months reporting "Biden doesn't have dementia" and "Biden's as sharp as ever", despite plain evidence to the contrary.
They lied. Over and and over again, for years. They quite literally told you to disregard the evidence of your eyes and ears.
Until they stopped, and suddenly Joe Biden's "mental decline" was no longer a conspiracy theory, but totally real and the reason to put Kamala Harris on the ballot.
Joe Biden's mental acuity did not change, all that changed was the requirement of the narrative.
Media reportage has no correlation with the truth. Not negative correlation, no correlation. They are unrelated.
If Joe Biden had cancer, and it was narratively convenient that he did not, they would say he did not.
If Joe Biden didn't have cancer, and it was narratively convenient that he did, they would say he did.
If it becomes narratively convenient that Biden no longer has cancer, they will just say it went away - and that will have no bearing or relation on whether or not it did go away, or ever existed in the first place.
If Joe Biden died tomorrow, and it was narratively convenient he was alive, they would pretend he was alive. And with current video and photo editing software it wouldn't even be that hard.
The news cycle has a purpose that is not related to facts or truth - again, not "opposed to" but "not related" - and as such our conversations about "the news" must be had, almost entirely, on the meta level.
Why this? Why now?
I really feel like I have said this a lot.
Reader Comments
This charade has been maintained for 5 or more years. What it demonstrates is that many people live in a TrumanShow world; they believe the mockingbird media's presentation. They don't question.
The next question, why hasn't the Trump team broadcast this? And will they? Is the Trump team trying to minimize the cognitive dissonance that would be the result?
Why now? Biden will "die" so they can put the charade away.
Truman Show is correct.
Check out this new documentary called Epidemic of Fraud, you folks may enjoy. BayBars ReRan [Link]
Oh, wait... What if the media is playing up his cancer diagnosis in order to set the stage for some new, bullshite cancer vaxx that will supposedly 'cure' Joe??
Since everything else about Joe and the medical industry is bullshite, I would expect nothing less than a dishonest, convoluted sales tool like this.
Time will tell
This stinks worse than Epstein
I don't think it's strange that this information was released, but I do find the vigor amongst Conservative outlets to be a little strange. They want to talk about his prostate for hours.
Alex Jones called it "The Biggest Scandal in US History," which I find absolutely baffling, especially considering the source. It obviously isn't that big of a deal. What actual difference does it make now...or then, for that matter? He's 85. That's a rapidly progressing and aggressive terminal illness all by itself. Was I not supposed to notice?
The situation surrounding a "Commander in Chief" with dementia is a far bigger scandal by leaps and bounds, but I doubt that is really all that scandalous considering we are talking about the USA. We are well known to be much more and gravely scandalous than that, but maybe it is the dementia thing that they expect us to forget about, and bury under the "poor Joe Biden" cancer story.
IDK, but you can bet Kash Patel and Dan Bongino won't be launching any diligent investigation into that. That's clearly not what the FBI's function is. Their clear and obvious function is to run cover for their blatantly nefarious controllers, whoever that is...it's not "We the People," that's for damn sure.
In fact, I hear they plan on doubling down on the BS and releasing some new massive media storm that will further bury the "Who the hell was actually running our government?" story." Clearly they are anxious to believe whatever they are told to believe, just like most of us, unfortunately.
No.
Here: [Link]
Here: [Link]
I agree. Not just the ear lobes but the FACE...
All the worlds a stage - Shakespeare !
Face, hairline, chin. I wonder how much money Jill Biden has made sacrificing Joe?
At least one of the Biden imposters has the wrong eye color. The hyper-realistic mask thing is absolutely real technology.
I think the real JB was replaced with an actor whenever they wanted him to look good and trotted out the real guy whenever they wanted him to fall (either literally or figuratively).