
© Ryan J Lane/Getty ImagesHouston, Texas fastest sinking city in the USA
Satellite data revealed that Houston is the fastest-sinking city in the U.S., and that all of the other biggest cities are dropping in at least some areas. Researchers say groundwater extraction is largely to blame for the sink.All of the biggest cities in the United States are sinking into the ground in places, new satellite data reveal — and
34 million people are affected. However, some cities are sinking faster and over a much larger area than others.
A study found that Houston is the fastest-sinking city, with some areas dropping at a rate of 0.4 inches (10 millimeters) per year, while most major cities have localized zones where the land is sinking faster than 0.2 inches (5 mm).
Cities are sinking for a variety of reasons, but the most common cause is groundwater extraction. The sinking is a problem because it increases the risk of flooding and threatens buildings and other infrastructure, according to the study, published Thursday (May 8) in the journal
Nature Cities.
To address the sinking, the researchers suggested measures like
flood mitigation, retrofitting vulnerable structures and limiting building in areas at greatest risk.
"As opposed to just saying it's a problem, we can respond, address, mitigate, adapt," study lead author
Leonard Ohenhen, a researcher at Columbia University's Columbia Climate School, said in a
statement. "We have to move to solutions."
Land subsidence is often associated with coastal areas, where a combination of sinking land and
rising sea levels can potentially drown cities like New Orleans and San Francisco in water. However,
land subsidence isn't just limited to coastlines and can cause problems across the U.S., according to the study.
The new research explored land subsidence in the country's 28 most populous cities, which all had populations exceeding 600,000 people.
The researchers used remote sensing data collected by the European Space Agency's Sentinel-1 satellites to create high-resolution maps of vertical land motion.The maps revealed that in all 28 cities, there was sinking in at least some parts of each city — a minimum of 20% of the urban area. Twenty five of the 28 cities had at least 65% of their area sinking. In the case of Houston, Dallas, Fort Worth, Chicago, Columbus, Detroit, Denver, New York, Indianapolis, and Charlotte,
the sinking covered 98% of the city.Houston, Dallas and Fort Worth had the highest proportion of areas (more than 70%) sinking at a rate of 0.1 inches (3 mm) per year.
Houston was the worst affected, with 43% of its land sinking more than 5 mm per year and 12% sinking at 10 mm per year, according to the study.
Why are the cities sinking?Land subsides due to both natural and human-driven factors. The ground is never truly static, with geological processes keeping us constantly on the move.
In cities like New York and Nashville, the ground is adjusting to the loss of massive ice sheets that weighed it down during the last ice age around 16,000 years ago. This process, called
glacial isostatic adjustment, causes land to rise and fall as it returns to its original pre-ice age shape.
However, despite these natural processes,
humans are still the biggest contributors to sinking urban land, according to the study. The researchers said that
80% of the urban land subsidence is associated with groundwater extraction. Pumping groundwater can have a variety of knock-on effects. For example,
removing water from aquifers with fine-grained sediments creates spaces between those sediments, which can then collapse and compact the earth below, pulling the surface down. In Texas, this problem is exacerbated by the pumping of oil and gas, according to the statement.
The researchers noted that sinking problems could be further exacerbated by
climate change. As the planet heats up,
droughts will likely create greater demand for groundwater and drive more extraction. Furthermore, the threat of flooding is likely to grow as climate change
increases the frequency and intensity of extreme weather, according to the study.
Another problem is that cities are still growing, which means more people will live on subsiding land, and therefore there will be more demand for groundwater and more strain on infrastructure. The study found that
vertical land motion has already put 29,000 buildings in high damage risk areas."As cities continue to grow, we will see more cities expand into subsiding regions," Ohenhen said. "Over time, this subsidence can produce stresses on infrastructure that will go past their safety limit."
Reader Comments
We know.
Time for some response to all this harmful bs - let it be ruthless.
In honor of those passed I reckon.
Lets kick some butt
I remember one time water was all upon the roads as I was driving to the chemical plant - and then a lightening bolt came down and the..
(to be continued - a long time from now - Houston - something is amiss - Tejas ought be split into five!....I mean did they land the lunar vehicle on the moon Houston - or is that "narrative" sinking as well....- see you later Tejas!)
Wouldn't you notice buildings subsiding unevenly? Ie not level.
~
Moreover - I ain't kidding - I was in Houston Texas during a heavy rain event - I think it was at the site - the name of which I can't remember just now - but there are so many chemical plants in the area - it is a hub of chemical activity - and if it is sinking unevenly - that is of concern no doubt.
Perhaps for the sake of local security some of the chemical business in Houston ought seek out other places to reside where the ground is more stable I reckon.
~
Regards,
Ken
Big tobacco production? I can imagine it being a rugged place.
I suspect that place is a serious money maker!
I could make that stuff - I know how - I walked that plant inside out.
You want on in this Jason or are you just talking shit with me?
Ken
No you've never mentioned cellulose acetate to me.
~
As for cellulose acetate - you start off with some fine wood pulp and acetic acid or should I say acetic anhydride - there can be a bit interchangeable - and then you cook the pulp in the acid for awhile and add some magic mystery ingredients at this point and that and you can end up with a solid powder - most offensive to ones nose (wear a mask please)....but then hells-bells - just melt it in acetone and then make the tow - that is the ingredient of a cigarette filter and let me tell you - tis most profitable!
~
And did you know - twas two Swiss fellas in their garage and sheds and shacks and such made the cellulose acetate "dope" liquid applied to the wings of planes in WWI? Did you know that - if not, now you do!
~
Reality is - my "real-world" experience coupled with publicly available info....with a little funding I'm sure I could get a pilot scale cellulose acetate production facility going - and hells-bells - I might just do that.
~
Cause - to be frank - I think it is the best polymer candidate for easy recycling - it starts out so natural - in contrast to the others so synthetic. What you think Jason - you want in on this?
Ken
[Link]
I didn't make it up - I'm a student of Tejas founding - I think it ought split into five - the sooner the better.
Cause Houston - something is sinking....
BK
Don't you think?
It's just as well there are so many ignorant people in the world otherwise these propaganda warriors wouldn't be able to earn a living.
Yes, climate change is happening.
But it's always happening, always changing. Shit, bubba, everything in Universe changes, all the time, there's no reason why climate shouldn't change.
But It Ain't Us making it happens.
If you just gotta believe something is causing it, I think the Sun will do just fine.
More sunshine. things warm up, less sunshine, things cool down.
It happens every day, pretty much - night tends to have a lot less sunshine.