OF THE
TIMES
"wouldn't feel good to make a deal with somebody else been lied to as much as you have - yet you have never lied to each other?"Not sure where this came from but it sounds interesting. My thought again is the 3rd party zigaboos who say: "Make it look good, click some wine glasses and be friends for the camera."..."And if you don't, then we will hurt someone you care about got it?". So In my view, it is lies to the camera, and to the audience, not an honest handshake between friends bartering/trading goods without the zigaboo mafia always there watching and getting their cut...
They also want an Asian NATO.I would argue that already exists with Japan,Taiwan and South Korea. And I would further argue that there are control/black mail files on all nation state leaders(and/or their families and friends). Each exchange of bluster and "standing up" including this posts Escobar style wine clicking(IMHO), is meant to stir up old world order sentiments (for resonating too) such as communist states vs. democracies. Russia having relations with North Korea to me is just going back to that kind of thinking(and expecting us to be impressed by it which I think we shouldn't be). i.e. surface level sensory perceptions(this post) vs. perceptions of knowing what is going on behind closed doors and in hotel rooms (with young underage prostitutes). Just saying!
Yes. If there are no good guys anywhere, what is the point of anything?My thought on that is "good guys" presented as "good"(in the wrong way) for propaganda purposes (specifically NATO vs. BRICS or West vs. East) is "bad". Both of these leaders (Putin and Jong-un) are similar in that they support the strong state model. i.e. a state/nation that does not accept outside interference in their countries affairs. That is it(that is the "good" IMHO). Both Putin and Jong-un can wear "white hats" proudly on that as far as I am concerned. To me this article "lies" because it presents them as being good because they are standing up to NATO or this or that alliance. But the interference(in my opinion) in a given countries affairs isn't coming from NATO. That is the propaganda(the "bad"). The real interference isn't from outside it is from within. Instead it is the zigaboos/Jewish Mafia and propaganda(and normal people falling for it). Moralizing of one nation state or group of nation states against another just serves to divert attention away from that...
In regards to the "old" division of communist and capitalist states, this does not have that meaning to me. I see this asI made only one word change. Do you really mean that it there is actual practical use in ideology of communism vs capitalism?pragmatismpropaganda .
In the EU, it is broken into little nations that are enslaved to the system through the IMF. The intent of NATO is to do the same to Russia; break it into little states. Why? Because little states and nations are easier to manipulate. They don't have resources, military strength, intelligence agencies, defense capabilities.I sure wish we could find common ground on what the actual problem is that we are facing(and the magnitude)??
We simply have different perspectives.I am saying we need to simply reconcile those perspectives. Lets try harder shall we?
โWe can de-risk but not decoupleโ from China, says Raytheon chief [Link]The industries in technocracy(not nations or "states") and social control and banking have no allegiances to countries even though the above makes it appear that way:
โIf we had to pull out of China, it would take us many many years to re-establish that capability either domestically or in other friendly countries.โYou said:
"China, Russia and the USA are not small nations. They can be self-sufficient with their own resoures and industries. "My contention is that they are not self-sufficient. Russia has had to be more that way because of the sanctions, so I will give you that(but it still needs its export market). But China "self-sufficient" that is a big NO in my "perspective". It is not self-sufficient. Every technocracy industry and its brother uses China's labor sweat shops for production: [Link] "friendly countries" not China? The question is irrelevant to me. Tariffs against China depend on which tariffs. To me that is just sanctions by a different name. I suspect that Trump will use them to attempt to save both the US and the Empire at the same time, but in the end the Empire may be the only winner. This needs to be watched carefully the details matter.
Exactly why do perspectives need to be reconciled? I don't see this as a contest or a conflict. Each individual in this world has a different background, education, culture, influences...What I am referring to in reconciliation is not in those things but in psychological profile. Said another way, the generic(based on common upbringings in childhood) and genetic aspects of ones Ego(resonator of being). Your ego (your face/"made in the image of God") is sensory based. What does that mean? It means that you have an involved "sense" of what is good and bad about your introverted sensory perception (making sense of the senses regardless of being color blind) to be what a harmonious environment should look like. You then take that and use it as input into your thinking which is very externalized/extroverted to how the impacts of what you sense as good and right should be thought of. You make an excellent director or mid level manager in what ever profession you choose.
What is the difference twixt Resolution and Reconciliation I ask you directly....that is a question - asked in good faith.I always go back to the last sentence of the American Declaration of Independence in these situations:
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.If one is to take divine providence to be the holy spirit guide:
Cs: "we are you in future do not worship us"...then redemption (the action of regaining or gaining possession of something in exchange for payment, or clearing a debt / "sin") is what we owe each other (the pledge) not to God who simply wants us to be more than what he created. A.k.a the creature(Atom/Atum fastened from clay being only his latest attempt with the adoring Eve from the rib DNA Atom version 2). Apollo's Creed:
If you stand toe-to-toe with this bum, he'll kill you. It doesn't take a man to stand there and get your head beat off...! He's just a man, Rock, so be MORE man than him ! Go get him; Eye Of the Tiger!All this so we can see through God's "eyes" and create something of our own free will(finally be cause of something not reactive of being a creature). Getting there though requires the "Reconciliation" (the action of making ones view/"perception" of reality compatible with another) and further complete that to "Resolution" for the sake of all of us as "human beings" being more than the creature("the topic of all topics"). Supposedly with that half finished pyramid on the USD dollar bill this process (of reconciliation) is forever being "perfected" but never "perfect". So there is no final "Resolution". But perhaps, that is what the challenge is in these times: "the human race". To be more than human (more than the creature of creation as defined by our public faces in "God's image")...Comments on that take of reality are welcome! In other words, Jesus died for "our sins" is a big F'in lie in my analysis. And the first to go in beliefs I say. Jesus as a profit I can buy that. Jesus is God and Jesus is Lord - no.
What do you think the year of 2025 ought be considered - after Resolution - after Determination - after Stretching - after Reckoning?I am not a profit. Not a believer in armageddon(do see that people are attempting to bring it about which is self defeating I think). Do believe though that we are going through a transformative time into a new age - a golden age I think(https://youtu.be/luUB-A_j55k). This process of "Resolution" though could be centuries in the future well past our current life times. Big stuff takes time and lots of passes though "time" to get it right.
As I noted we have different perspectives. My experience includes philosophy, research science in pharmacology, computer programming, Fourth Way teaching, travel to other countries, marriage and research into many religious teachings. All of those affect how I see the world. Then you have individual aspects like family, events, friends, thinking patterns like making connections, emotional development, and psychology.I make no statements about my experience(did you notice that?). It is rejecting all of mine as "worthless", my opinions, accomplishments, beliefs, "unique experiences" etc that allows me to "see". For all you know I didn't graduate from grade school and drool out of my mouth... Actually I don't do that but when I was a kid others often described me as "odd". It took most of the rest of my life and a divorce to figure out why.
For example, I gave a simple example of perspective being color blindness. If you apply the Fourth Way system, then you have 3 brains for the 3 Yoga paths, and one part of each brain has directed attention. This part sees perspective in space, emotion, or thinking.Being color blind just means that you have a faulty sensor(intuitive is to see the proper colors despite being "color blind", or being blind folded physically, or even better yet, you never had physical eye balls to begin with). Emotion can be sensed just like sensing the fragrance of a flower(again sensory based not intuitive based sensing). Intuitive emotional perspective would be determining that someone would have say an emotional reaction to something that has no basis in reality(at all), but could be applied to reality to predict what "could happen" if such and such situation were to occur. Vision (intuitive) thinking is to see inside ones mind or other minds and see how they think and why. A.k.a. reading one's thoughts("I know what you are going to say") vs. asking someone to explain their thinking using words to describe object concepts etc that can be read with a "sensory" perspective. See the difference? Methods like Fourth Way/3 brains etc. can be studied true (and believe me I have and do study - got a copy of Fourth Way myself on the shelf ), but can one apply? For example, I am applying the awareness elevation of being "connected" to others(something you introduced me to by the way). Think of some examples of your own. If you can describe then maybe we both can apply?
Intuition is a "sense" that is not dependent on the senses, like sight or sound. It can be a number of different things. For example, the instinctive brain can sense someone watching or sense someone is about to call you on the phone. The sexual center can become aware of a perfect match without seeing the person invovled. Then you have psychics and remote viewers who "see" a future unfolding. Then you have flashes of higher centers.I concede that a lot of these are interpreted as "intuitive" by the larger audience of this sentence as it is read. However I have a different perspective! Those things are still sensory perspective to me. For example, becoming aware that someone is going to call you can be "told" to you by your upper centers of being or other entities attached to ones self (whispering in your ear). This is still sensory perspective to me unless you can explain why said person is going to call you (or who or why an entity is whispering in your ear). Let me explain. Intuitive isn't seeing the unseen without reason. Your thoughts need to be untangled from those given to you from others. One most be able to have a near death experience and return to their 3D body and still retain the knowledge etc that was bestowed upon oneself in the journey. If one cannot then the meaning is lost(the intuition is lost by my definition of intuition). Intuitive perspective is at the end of the day deriving meaning and insight from reality not an advanced sensory array of reality.
Thanks TB. As I have stated, we have different perspectives. I am not attacking yours and I am not defending mine.I agree. Another point to the positive.
Your definition is that intuition provides meaning and insight into realityI agree with what remains after crossing out the rest. Meaning of reality is not just for me. Just like your senses of reality is not just for you. Might as well not post any comments if that was the case. We would just be talking to ourselves. Of course LindaMay would say "Talkers" are useless anyway.for you. Great.
When we look around at the clown show, the genocide, the psychopath manipulation of populations through divide and conquer,Good so far...I agree.
the attacks on church,Depends on which church and what is meant by "attack". By elevating Jesus to God level, mainstream Christianity(Zionism) is at odds not only with atheism and Judaism, but with Islam. It is ones choice to worship idols. I am not going to do it. If one sees that as an "attack" then maybe one should consider why that is so? "Jesus blessings be with you" I would have no issue with. Jesus is the only way for "salvation" is the "attack", not the "attacked" in my book.
Islam is defined as terroristAnd so are Christians when FBI agents dress up as "white supremacists" and attack Washington DC on Jan 6th. Religious "terrorists" are fake. So when they dress up as "extremists" one only has to know that behind the uniform/flag/ideology etc is a deceiver/"name stealer"/Jewish Mafia/zigaboo etc. every single time . Even if the "boots on the ground" doing the extremist actions "believe", there is money/funding/control files/NLP etc. coming from the deceivers to enable them as "front men" or to be the fall guys.
no men or women, the plandemic genocide...what is the purpose?Divide and rule and control that is the purpose. That is it.
In a Darwinian chance world where life is meaningless, there is none.Darwinian was from the beginning a divide and rule, especially the aspect of "survival of the fittest"(steeped in the ideology of eugenics). But genetics and line breeding(up and down of IQ) is not meaningless - it is eugenics(a big part of technocracy). It is used for control purposes.
In a spiritual world, where Jesus was tested for 40 days and nights, it is a test.I don't think that Jesus can take away the responsibility of being tested from the human race or deriving meaning from all the major religions(especially when scriptural text of all the major religions can be reconciled for meaning). It is a choice to follow the Bible exclusive. I just choose not to.
Thanks TB. As I have noted we do not have the same perspective. I don't know how anyone, at least in the USA, cannot see that Christianity has been attacked. For example, a baker refused to bake a cake for a gay marriage because he was Christian. He was sued. I don't see how anyone cannot see that "terrorism" was developed by the 9/11 false flag to first attack Islamic countries, as was done in Iraq. That is my perspective.I am well aware of your perspective. I get it.
What you have not done is show how your intuition has revealed reality to you. What is the unique insight it has given you?I have done my best to try and explain my insights and intuition to you. And specifically how we psychologically perceive reality differently. Gone over a wide range of topics and examples. Have a great day Dwoods44!
You indicate that your intuition sees reality as it is, and this is the universal reality for everyone.Meaning is what I specialize in due to my physiological profile of being an analyst. What good is an analyst if they can not make sense of data? I do believe that there is a universal reality for everyone. This concept was first introduced to me in the book 'Opening the Eye of New Awareness' written by the Dalai Lama (prior to his complete subversion by the CIA - particularly in propaganda about him). In that book, one is introduced to the concept of the two truths: Universal and Conventional truths(where Universal and Conventional truths are mutually exclusive of each other). Even if I have a universal truth in hand, others can only see that truth if the conventional truths can be identified as being false. A universal truth to me is: "worship is bad". That would mean that all instances of "worship is good" are conventional truths and thus universally false.
Can you give your intuition world view of life on earth, history, religion, civilizations, purpose, meaning, and in particular your purpose in life?I take a page from the Cs:
"All that exists are lessons", "All that exists, exists within you".Therefor, I see my "life" here on earth as an actor in 3D film strip(at 3D a crash test dummy single threaded consciousness probe) in a lesson(s), who has a "director" controller (your DWoods44 3D psychological probe profile I think in your/this lifetime) further up the awareness density hierarchy: Myself/Yourself at 4D residing possibly on Earth once it transitions to 4D likely in a "future" lifetime(that already "exists"), 5D - My/Your top level "self"(includes female and male versions of "self", including info about genes etc soul and groups of souls, "city on the hill"... the best of what "we" want to "be" think is "good" or "bad" and "right" and "wrong" - source of "do as thy wilt"/freewill), 6D Cs("we are you in the future do not worship us"), and finally 7D (awareness of all and oblivion - a.k.a God). My purpose here on 3D Earth is to be an analyst which is my Ego "image of the face of god"/design of my 3D consciousness probe(to make it real high level)...Does that make sense?
A universal truth to me is: "worship is bad".Is that a refutation of uncertainty?
Is that a refutation of uncertainty?It is(I think) a: "always has been and always will be" of "us" guiding ourselves Cs/6D unified thought form of "us"("we are you in the future do not worship us"). At the Cs level of awareness (according to the transcripts) very little is a coincident. And nothing is "chance": it is all choice. And they/"we" are purposely are not depriving of us of our free will even when we (Buffalo_Ken/Dwoods44/TBoris) know very little down at 3D existence("middle Earth").
Because worship forms from simply "not knowing"....but couple that with "faith" - and now a connection might occur....it might not as well - but rationale minds sometimes dismiss "uncertainty" - but uncertainty is inviolate.Faith's opposite is not uncertainty but instead doubt(I think). Both faith and doubt have uncertainty. Faith and doubt for any human endeavor or action, should be considered rationally(I think - both heart and mind should not be discounted). And both should be considered and fleshed out I think (since I am a big believer in dichotomies ). Said in a different way, the concept of the "devils advocate" keeps one from doing insane things vs doing something with probability of success vs just possibility in outcome. Truth(actual Faith in my mind) needs to be that way based on probability not "chance" or "blind faith". So messiah's to me are possibilities not probabilities. And therefor Faith in them is blind and thus worship.
It always has been and always will be. Of course, that is my "absolute presupposition" in that time moves on endlessly - and nobody really knows the future now - do they?I think that "time" as we know it progressing on endlessly is because of our perception at 3D level(living in 3D film stills with movement being an illusion). At 5D there is no "time" or "beings" or motion. At 5D we have 4D "movies" being modified/directed by us and in some cases constructed out of whole cloth. "Walkers" (using LindaMay's parlance) don't show up until 4D where we can exist and "be" individuals "living" our non-stop unending "time" of "action"("kings of the world of doing"). At 7D whole universes can be brought into existence and forgotten at will but "God" does not "walk" I think (in the "flesh" or otherwise). And God does not interfere in our "freewill" or have a "plan" for us other than "faith" for us to become aware of who and what we are. And at that point "we" (collectively) will be looking though "God's" eyes ourselves as God. We put it all together and then have it undone - eternity and oblivion...beginnings and endings the same thing.
1. Faith can move mountains.Faith when it is aligned with universal truths can move mountains (I Agree). Energy follows intent (Voodoo6). On the other hand, blind "faith" in messiahs only moves mountains for the deceivers at the expense of everyone else. But I do have Faith in us collectively since I believe that God has faith in us.
2. Uncertainty tis part of life - live with it.Yes you and I both living in 3D movies ("here and now") have uncertainty as part of our short hard lives and we do "live" with it. For the gap between probability and certainty that is where getting help "Faith" from our greater awareness is the answer(I think). I start with the "we are all connected" that Dwoods44 found in that link. And the Cs saying we need to "network" at the 4D level to advance individually and collectively.
- oh my - I hope you change your moniker soon enough.....I like Dolly - more when she was younger.I found the youngest Dolly I could find. See if you can dig up a better one and I will use it.
I agree with the Cs we are each on earth to experience, to learn from the experience, and evolve in consciousness including compassion.The Cs(level 6 density of awareness) from the beginning define two paths to evolve consciousness: STS - Service to Self, and STO - Service to Others. The Cs explained that even though they are STO, they are balanced in their advice/guidance to us to protect our free will - including the freewill of STS(which comes from 4D STS beings). So that is why the Cs can not be a source of "divine will". But they are the ultimate guide of: "I listened to my conscience". So when Trump survived assassination(the one with the ear), they explained that "divine intervention" came from "us" (our top level selves at 5D). So this is why there can be a "fake" assassination (of Trump) which is a result of choices of our "divine will" at 5D(with our individual souls having a say/ choice in what happens "fake" or not)...The good news for us is "we" did that (regardless of the "good" or "bad" of it). An example of us using our "collective" divine "do as thy wilt" freewill...
A win-win.
~
Win-win means both parties benefit.
Simple.
~
If that doesn't "convince" the reader - then think about it this way..... ~
win-win