RFico
© Sean Gallup/Getty ImagesSlovak Prime Minister Robert Fico
Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico talks sense to a deranged West addicted to 'collective solipsism'.

Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico has done something very normal that in today's West is highly unusual - Fico said that when a war ends, actual peace should follow.

This sensational idea is the essence of his statement, made at a press conference in Bratislava, that if the Ukraine War "ends during the [2023-2027] mandate of this government," he will do "everything possible for the renewal of economic and normal relations with Russia."

What an outrageously reasonable idea! Especially for the leader of a small state that belongs to both the EU and NATO. And all the more so as he is heading to a meeting with the Ukrainian leadership to discuss how to continue the transit of Russian gas through Ukraine so that the Slovak economy does not go the way of Germany's - a slow, then increasingly rapid collapse by energy strangulation at the hands of Washington and Kiev.

Fico made the remarks about re-establishing normality with Russia - which would go far toward re-establishing normality in Europe in general - at a press conference on his government's new tax policies, namely increases. They are needed, Fico argues, to lower a fiscal deficit that has grown bad enough to lead to a downgrade by Fitch International at the end of last year due to what the ratings agency called a "deterioration in public finances and an unclear consolidation path."

In other words, like all other EU countries, Slovakia is struggling with economic problems. Its government seeks to tackle them by deficit reduction; the opposition does its part and disagrees. So far, nothing unusual. But there is something that is very unusual in the Slovak case - namely, the clearsighted and open acknowledgement of two facts by the leader:

First, that Slovakia has no good reason to make its problems worse by giving up on comparatively inexpensive energy from Russia, whether in the shape of oil or gas. Never mind that the EU exerts, in Fico's words, "huge pressure" to bend Slovakia to its will. Indeed, as Fico has correctly pointed out, grand gestures of cutting yourself off from Russian energy tend to end up with buying it anyhow, only at a higher price and via middlemen.

And secondly, that the eventual end of the Ukraine conflict should lead to a rapid re-establishment of normal commercial and political relations with Russia.

Unfortunately, there as well, the Slovak leadership is a lonely voice; the only comparably sane positions on these questions are to be found in Hungary. It is true that there are more and more voices among yesterday's ultra-hardliners in the West who are beginning to strike a different, more timid tone now that Moscow is winning the war against both Ukraine and NATO.
Germany's Olaf Scholz is begging for a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin. It is slowly dawning on NATO's former figurehead, Jens Stoltenberg, that Ukraine will lose territory; and France's Emmanuel Macron is becoming gloomy about the potential 'end' of the EU.
But unfortunately, there are enough obstinate hardliners left, and even those who are beginning to get cold feet are still nurturing delusions such as a territorially (and otherwise) reduced Ukraine inside NATO.

Even if and when the EU finally learns its lesson, things will not be easy at all. Though Fico could hardly be expected to say anything to the contrary, there is one part of his statement that is not quite as realistic as the rest - that the "European Union needs Russia, and Russia needs the European Union."

In principle, yes - as neighbors, the EU and Russia should derive great mutual advantages from stable and persistent cooperation. But in reality, as shaped by Western economic warfare via sanctions, Russia has ever less interest in the EU, for two reasons:

First: The EU has revealed itself as knowing no limits, not even of elementary self-interest, in its obedience to the ongoing US attempts to degrade Russia; from Moscow's perspective, it is an entirely unreliable actor since it does not even act rationally.

Second, in response to the sanctions attack, Russia has succeeded in re-casting and re-orienting its economy in a manner that makes the EU much less important for it. None of this means that there is no potential for future cooperation. But it won't be the same as in the past, it won't be symmetrical, and Russia will emerge with a stronger position than the EU which it will not hesitate to use.

Fico is to be commended for his good sense and the persistent courage to speak it, especially in view of the fact that he barely survived an assassination attempt by a deranged Ukraine fan, who may or may not have been just that - a crazed loner. The Slovak leader is not giving up and he should not. Yet he is up against something extraordinarily resistant to reasonable arguments - a form of mass delusion among the West's elites.

The real problem is that so many Western leaders have not simply lost their connection to reality - they are proud of having proactively abandoned it. That's why, in the final analysis, their obstinate refusal to give up on misguided wishful thinking is not really even about Russia. They are in rebellion against having to heed facts as such, and what annoys them most about the Russian leadership is its insistence on living in the real world.

Think of this Western syndrome as the real-life equivalent of something Orwell foresaw in his novel 1984, which is all too often misunderstood as a silly Cold War pamphlet. In his drab, imaginary future, which is at least as much about the abyss of human hubris as about politics, the ruling elites practice what one of them describes as "collective solipsism." If we all believe we are levitating, then we are levitating. Gravity be damned. That is as concise a description of the state of mind that prevails in Washington, Brussels, and London as we will get.