The US-led military bloc NATO needs a "more robust" industry in order to refill the stocks of weaponry and ammunition emptied by a year of supplying Kiev, the bloc's Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said on Monday at an industrial conference in Germany.
NATO "must continue to support Ukraine" as it has done since 2014, Stoltenberg said at the Day of Industry in Berlin, hosted by the Federation of German Industries (BDI).
"We also need a more robust defense industry," the secretary general argued. "Our weapons and ammunition stocks are depleted and need to be replenished. Not just in Germany, but in many countries across NATO."
He added that he met with representatives of the military industry last week and discussed how best to ramp up production and streamline supply chains, adding that this was "key to sustain our support for Ukraine."
The NATO secretary general also repeated his argument that only Ukraine's victory on the battlefield can result in a just and lasting peace. Kiev's forces had attempted a large-scale offensive on the southern front over the past week, with heavy losses in manpower, as well as in weaponry provided by the West.
The US and its allies have sent over $100 billion worth of weapons, equipment and ammunition to Kiev just last year, after the Ukraine conflict escalated. They insist this does not actually make them a party to the hostilities with Russia, though Moscow has repeatedly warned them to that effect.
Comment: Yep. And more than 30% of those supplies now look like this, as Russia pounds equipment warehouses and ammo depots well behind the front lines:
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has accused the West of direct involvement, not just with the weapons deliveries but also by training Ukrainian troops in the UK, Germany, Italy and elsewhere.
Kiev has complained that a lot of the weapons coming in are in such poor condition they have to be cannibalized for parts. At least a third of Ukraine's military potential is undergoing repairs at any given time, according to the New York Times.
Reader Comments
The storyline is as real as a three dollar bill.
A Russian victory will put them in direct confrontation with Nato, so why not drag it out and drain the enemy's reserves ?
And China knows they are next on the US list. So help the Russians in their war to weaken the own potential enemy.
What a strategic blunder on US/EU side.
But the Russians are not fooled any longer. I am pretty sure the military plans are ready to counter any Nato attempt. And even if they don't and stick to their indirect warfare, they will be presented the bill once this conflict is over. Because it became clear in the meantime who depends on whom.