The study authors claim that BNT162b2 (the Pfizer vaccine), is reverse transcribed inside human liver cells as quickly as six hours after injection.
While the study is receiving criticism and, as one would expect, there are many detractors, the study at least shows that the spike protein mRNA could possibly be reverse transcribed into the human genome. How likely that is to happen is apparently up for debate, yet all the assurances that this was "impossible" are clearly bunk.
Join us on this episode as we talk about this pervasive threat to our genome.
And check us out on Brighteon!
Show links:
- Can the Vaccines Write the Spike Protein Into the Human Genome?
https://chrismasterjohnphd.substack.com/p/can-vaccines-write-the-spike-protein?s=r
- Alden et al: Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line; the criminal Pfizer and Moderna should have done the trials
https://www.drpaulalexander.com/blogs/news/alden-et-al-intracellular-reverse-transcription-of-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-mrna-vaccine-bnt162b2-in-vitro-in-human-liver-cell-line-the-criminal-pfizer-and-moderna-should-have-done-the-trials
- Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine converts to DNA inside human liver cells, new study
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-converts-dna-inside-human-liver-cells-accordingDo the
- mRNA Covid-19 Vaccines Degrade Higher Human Functions?
https://hatchardreport.com/do-the-mrna-covid-19-vaccines-degrade-higher-human-functions/
For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:
♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
♥Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channel/objectivehealth
♥LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@objectivehealth:f
♥Odysee: https://odysee.com/@objectivehealth:f
And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here:
♥https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16H-nK-N0ANdsA5JFTT12_HU5nUYRVS9YcQh331dG2MI/edit?usp=sharing
Running Time: 00:34:07
Download: MP3 — 31.2 MB
Reader Comments
The problem is some of us saw the stagehands in black moving the pieces around. Some of us peeked behind the curtain and saw it was just a decrepit old man with smoke and mirrors. Now we know its all a bullshit show, a false reality for us to believe and clap at and participate in.
I got up and left the theatre a long time ago, as did most of the folks here.
There was no "old normal" and there is no "new normal". There is only, as Jon Rappoport says, mind control , targeting the individual to passively accept the reality presented to him.
there were made a tv production where known musicians should learn (the language) of joik i 3 days in order to tell another person how they truely see them as who they really are.
what really amazed me was that they all succeded/did really well.
if you from time to time have no better things to do for an hour or so, you can give it a go.
it will be in several forreign languages, but the stories are simple; famous artist let go of own ego, learning forreign language (joik) in 3 days in order to explain to a dear person how they see them as they are. then performing. [Link]
As soon as someone tries to use COVID to justify yet another thing to encroach upon and destroy public rights and liberties - which is all but guaranteed anytime someone invokes the virus - call them what they really are: tyrant sympathizer and abettor.
Remember, the entire purpose behind the lockdowns and restrictions is to instill a sense of panic and fear in a population, in order to get them to act in a certain manner, so that said...
Anytime someone tries to invoke a sense of fear in the public, in order to pass some new law or legislation, they are doing the work of a tyrant.
Anytime someone tries to use COVID to keep people afraid, to justify what is being done 'to protect people', they are doing the work of a tyrant.
Anytime someone tries to claim that 'combating the virus' or 'protecting people from a mild cold' justifies trampling all over basic constitutional rights, and the rights of the people, they are doing the work of a tyrant:
[Link]
That’s checkmate by the NWO in my opinion because i am not going to abandon my family over it.
What are your thoughts on this?
i have taken them all, but i will still not come to harm you - unless you give me a very good reason for doing so.
i think msm/sott/other/alt/madias have lost sight of what is important in life in general - and what is not.
Bechamp or Pasteur - A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology
The Private Science of Louis Pasteur
The Poisoned Needle Immunization The Reality Behind the Myth
Dissolving Illusions Diseases, Vaccine and the Forgotten History
Virus Mania
The Contagion Myth
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
Pasteur's theory up to this day was not and is still NOT proven!
No virus of any kind was ever isolated, purified or sequenced in its 100% form!
Viruses do not cause diseases BUT are result of them!
But it was on Bart Kay's Odysee channel a few weeks ago, talking with a lady about her battle with parasites.
Not a confirmed statement (as with the exact ingredients of the clot shot), but it makes perfect sense. These parasites are not lethal, and just create more revenue stream for the pharma industry.
* They confess: they had no virus when they concocted the test for the virus; they “contrived” a model by pretending to find what they wanted to find; it’s called a self-fulfilling prophecy
This is the con and the crime that drove millions of lives, and economies, into ruin by Jon Rappoport [Link]
Quiz: If an agency of the federal government revealed they had no basis for constructing a diagnostic test that was used on millions of people; but the test was the cornerstone of a national lockdown; and the lockdown drove the economy off a cliff; and destroyed millions of lives; however, NOW, that agency says, they DO have a basis for the test; would you buy what they’re selling?
If your answer is yes, you’re in good company; the company I call Blind, Ignorant, Denialist, Hoaxing Journalists.
The CDC issued a document that bulges with devastating admissions.
The release is titled, “07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.” It begins explosively:
“After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.”
Many people believe this means the CDC is giving up on the PCR test as a means of “detecting the virus.” The CDC isn’t saying that at all.
They’re saying the PCR technology will continue to be used, but they’re replacing what the test is looking FOR with a better “reference sample.” A better marker. A better target. A better piece of RNA supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.
CDC/FDA are confessing there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test which has been used to detect the virus, starting in February of 2020---right up to this minute.
In other words, the millions and millions of “COVID cases” based on the PCR test in use are all suspect. Actually, that statement is too generous. Every test result of every PCR test should be thrown out.
To confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release titled, “SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data.” Here is a killer quote:
“During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation. While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”
Translation: We, at the CDC, did not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we concocted the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, it’s unbelievable, right? And that’s the test we’ve been using all along. So we CONTRIVED samples of the virus. We fabricated. We lied. We made up (invented) synthetic gene sequences and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, without having the faintest idea of what we were doing, because, again, we didn’t have an actual specimen of the virus. We had no proof THERE WAS something called SARS-CoV-2.
This amazing FDA document goes to say the Agency has granted emergency approval to 59 different PCR tests since the beginning of the (fake) pandemic. 59. And, “…it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”
Translation: Each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and concocted different fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus---the virus we didn’t have. Obviously, then, these tests would give unreliable results. THE PCR TESTS USED CONTRIVED SPECIMENS OF THE VIRUS WE DIDN’T HAVE.
BUT, don’t worry, be happy, because NOW, the CDC and the FDA say, they really do have actual virus samples of SARS-CoV-2 from patients; they have better targets for the PCR test, and labs should start gearing up for the new and improved tests.
In other words, they were lying THEN, but they’re not lying NOW. They were “contriving,” but now they’re telling the truth.
If you believe that, I have Fountain of Youth water for sale, extracted from the lead-contaminated system of Flint, Michigan.
Here, once again, I report virology’s version of “we isolated the virus”:
They have a soup they make in their labs.
This soup contains human and monkey cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and all sorts of other random genetic material. Because the cells start to die, the researchers ASSUME a bit of mucus from a patient they dropped in the soup is doing the killing, and THE VIRUS must be the killer agent in the mucus.
This assumption is entirely unwarranted. The drugs and chemicals could be doing the cell-killing, and the researchers are also starving the cells of vital nutrients, and that starvation could kill the cells.
There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup, or that it is doing the cell-killing, or that it exists.
Yet the researchers call cell-death “isolation of the virus.”
To say this is a non-sequitur is a vast understatement. In their universe, “We assume, without proof, we have the virus buried in a soup in a dish in the lab” equals, “We’ve separated the virus from all surrounding material.”
Virology equals “how to spread bullshit for a living and scare the world.” Other than that, it’s perfect.
[Link]
One billion tax payers' money to manufacture the consent into the poisonous injections being "effective", "necessary", "needed" and "without alternative" to fight the big lie of a "pandemic".
Any bets what will happen now - that the covid relief is diverted to Ukraine?
Reminds me of my childhood, when we had to talk in crypted metaphors about certain things, and read between the lines. For some unknown reasons, tyrants and fanatics seem to have no sense of humor, or such indirect language.
Welcome to Socialism 2.0 ...
*
"A study published last month in Frontiers in Virology claims to have discovered that a sequence of the COVID-19 virus’ spike protein is a 100% match to a modified mRNA sequence patented by Moderna in 2016, and last month, Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel proposed the COVID pandemic may have been the result of a lab leak."
If you remember, Whitney Webb points out how slimy the execs & company really is in: 'COVID-19: Moderna Gets Its Miracle' [Link]
*
COVID-19 erased the regulatory and trial-related hurdles that Moderna could never surmount before. Yet, how did Moderna know that COVID-19 would create those conditions months before anyone else, and why did they later claim that their vaccine being tested in NIH trials was different than their commercial candidate?