© AP/Natacha PisarenkoPolice who were stained with yellow paint thrown by protesters on the outskirts of Buenos Aires, Argentina, July 13, 2017.
Understanding the politics of police reform in Latin America may be informative for those who hope for changes in policing in the U.S.President Donald Trump's appointment of Attorney General Jeff Sessions has led people to
speculate about the fate of recent police reform efforts.
Early into his tenure,
Sessions said he intended to "pull back on" the Justice Department's investigations of police department abuses, saying they diminish effectiveness.
Americans have mobilized extensively in the past three years against police brutality, militarization and corruption through the Black Lives Matter and related movements. Government officials at the federal level have responded to these demands by creating
specialized task forces to recommend best practices, and investigating troubled police departments and
enforcing reforms. Courts have also worked to roll back
unconstitutional stop-and-frisk policies, while city governments have created
independent oversight agencies and enacted robust
community policing programs.
But will it stick?
My research on police reform in Latin America shows that
such reforms are highly vulnerable to political reversals. These cases reveal how they can be quickly rolled back before they can take hold and demonstrate results.Understanding the politics of police reform in Latin America may be informative for those who hope for changes in policing in the U.S.
Police reform and politicsLeaders in
Colombia and
Buenos Aires Province, Argentina, overhauled their police institutions in 1993 and 1998, respectively. These reforms were a response to rising crime rates, as well as pervasive police violence, corruption and ineffectiveness in fighting crime.
Comprehensive
police reform laws were crafted through broad political consensus. Lawmakers in the Colombian congress and the Buenos Aires provincial legislature enacted sweeping legislation to demilitarize, decentralize and professionalize Colombia's National Police and the Police of Buenos Aires Province. The reforms also improved recruitment standards and training, strengthened oversight agencies and created formal spaces for community participation.
© AP/Roger RichardsFormer Colombian President Ernesto Samper during a nationally televised speech in 1995.
Only one year after reforms were passed, however, Ernesto Samper was elected president of Colombia. He vowed to undermine his predecessor's dramatic overhaul of the National Police, saying his government would "
let the police regulate itself."
Similarly, in Buenos Aires Province, Carlos Ruckauf was elected governor in 1999. He left his predecessor's police reform legislation intact. However, he made his preferred approach to crime-fighting clear: "
we have to hit the criminals with bullets."
Both politicians used citizens' concerns over rising crime to lead calls for greater police autonomy, in order to be "tougher" on crime. Under their administrations, hard-fought police reform gave way to periods of "counter-reform." These were characterized by increased police autonomy, weakened accountability, militarization, unchecked corruption and extrajudicial killings.Other research on policing in Latin America has provided compelling evidence of the impact of such
political rhetoric. When politicians promoting "tougher" police strategies are elected,
police killings and repression of citizens increase.
These examples reveal how the
long-term aims of police reforms can be difficult to reconcile with the short-term goals of politicians.Police support for reformMy research also demonstrates that police forces that are resistant to reforms have considerable power to undermine them. In Buenos Aires Province, police officials
succeeded in dismantling a system of neighborhood security forums that allowed citizens to conduct oversight of police. Police officials felt the forums gave citizens too much control over police affairs. As a result, they lobbied the governor and security minister to reduce the funding and staff needed to implement them.
By contrast,
a similar participatory system in São Paulo, Brazil, has endured for three decades. There, police are incorporated into the governance structure of the community councils, allowing for a more collaborative relationship. As a result, many police officers have come to see forum members as their advocates. Although citizens in São Paulo do not have oversight authority, the police's cooperation has contributed to the persistence of these participatory spaces.
Thus, reformers must identify and bolster police officials with a stake in sustaining reforms.
Without support from insiders, reform is unlikely to last.Sustaining momentumPolice reform is also made vulnerable by the fact that, after reform passes, its proponents demobilize. In Buenos Aires and Colombia, human rights and activist organizations remained active when politicians began to reverse reforms. But the broadly shared societal outrage that led to reform in the first place dissipated. With it went the momentum needed to sustain reform in the long term.
Research from both
the U.S. and
Latin America has shown that
campaigning for "tough on crime" policies, or "penal populism," is a highly successful strategy for winning elections. As scholars have shown, such policies can
generate broad support among a diverse set of voters. So-called
"pro-order" coalitions, the collection of civil society organizations, media outlets and politicians that advocate for "
law and order" policies, have similarly demonstrated great capacity to mobilize resources and public support.
Failing to sustain reform coalitions means there is little counterweight to these pressures.
'Counter-reform' in the US?Is the U.S. entering a period of "counter-reform" similar to that observed in Colombia and Argentina?
Opponents of reform,
including Sessions, warn of "a longer-term trend of violent crime going up." They have also
floated theories such as the "
Ferguson effect," the idea that growing scrutiny of police activity has made police more timid. Such arguments may scare voters into believing that police reform may make police less effective in fighting crime.
Meanwhile, President Trump has engaged in rhetoric similar to his Colombian and Argentine counterparts. As a candidate, he called on police to be "
very much tougher" in fighting crime. As president, he has said his will be "
a law-and-order administration" that will "empower" police.
It is too early to tell whether these police reform efforts will backslide. While the U.S. context differs in some ways from Latin America, these examples demonstrate that police reform is a continuous and contentious process that is difficult to achieve and highly prone to reversal.
A huge death toll, untold misery and never ending violence. Criminal enterprises fund themselves with the money, politicians turn a blind eye because it fuels the prison, police and military industries which they have a hand in.
Prohibition is a failed ideology. It failed in the 1920s for alcohol and it still fails today with Drugs. Corporations are implicit from oil to pharma. Money is made from Prohibition but only the Parasites that feed off it.
Human beings have used mood altering substances for millennia and will continue to do so for millennia to come.