.
OF THE
TIMES
Exactly what I was thinking, they are running low on ammo.
New Zealand did this. Nothing happened. Horse face wouldn't be questioned.
Age of ai??? Narrative alert, red alert, red alert...
6 yrs later, 6 years too late, 6 years of nothing.
All my life I have been told there was coming three days of darkness at the end of the world. Is darkness merely lack of light, or could it be...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
When somebody fakes a footage
1. he films the location first to have a raw clip for background.
2. UFO is created in specialized program with raw clip in background so the artificial UFO blends into the film.
3. He has to track and match the UFO position to his involuntary camera shaking done while making the film.
4. If the faker shakes his camera too much he has a lot of camera matching/tracking work to do. A team?
- A fake UFO footage made with a computer is always short. Less than a minute usually.
- computer-made UFOs have short and predictable path, you can almost always tell.
- showing a fake UFO the camera mostly stays stationary (makes he fakers work so much easier)
- we rarely see a perfectly stable camera in case of real-life footages.
- we see stable cameras in high-budget movies made with pro studio equipment.
The real thing:
- Here we see a five minute wildly shaking camera footage: such length would be an arduous work for one faker or a team.
- The prominent and "quality" digicam noise is all over the Doughnut-shape too, the*same* as on the background.
All this __while zooming in and out__ and during violent shaking movements.
- The glow of the rotating Doughnut-shape looks like a row of colored lights: this amount of detail - the creativity required to pull off such an astonishing effect -
would require a professional or his pro-team.
- behavior of the glow is too 'realistic' plus there is a lot of zooming in/out. It would be quite hard, I think, to create on the computer.
A believable glow is hard to fake, plus simulating camera lens effects over the glow, while zooming, and artifacts all over this film,
i would say this would require a lot of work.
This footage and its subject seems real.