.
OF THE
TIMES
Well - judge away - but better to "burn it" (assuming energy is recovered) then just dumping it somewhere - same goes for MOST - almost all of the...
I say this - any judge puts "federal" law above State Constitutions - don't even know the federal constitution nor the ideology of the Founders -...
The may be hope for people. Everyone who took the vaccine should watch this video of Tucker Carlson's interview [Link] This doctor has invented a...
Trump's support is already waning mightily. He has made a few good hires, but his choice of Susie Wiles, and now a new "Pharma approved" FDA pick,...
Here's some money, sorry for the violation, now what?
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2025 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
What I see as the flaw in the presentation is that the columns that he puts up is in regard to whether Climate change is human caused. At least that is what he initially says. When he answers the question as false it is in regard to whether climate change is real and not as he initially stated whether human caused climate change is real. There is a big difference.! OSIT
The initial preview of the report by the IPCC that got aired in December 2006 stated that humans contribute less than 20% to Global warming. If that is so, then taking action directed by the pathocracy is not a healthy option.