Health & Wellness
The study is published in the Archives of Internal Medicine.
The research was conducted by a team of scientists from various Canadian research centres.
They looked at data from a group of patients of average age 65.1 who were aged 50 and over who were taking SSRI antidepressants on a daily basis. These patients were part of a larger study under the umbrella of the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) Research Group. The CaMos group comprises a randomly selected, population-based cohort of 5008 adults aged 50 and over who are followed over 5 years for incident fractures.
The patients had been filling in questionnaires about their bone breakages cause by various minor events such as falling out of bed, off a chair, or similar minimal trauma incidents. All the fractures had been confirmed with radiographs.
The researchers found 137 patients within the CaMos cohort who were using SSRIs on a daily basis. The SSRIs they were using included: fluvoxamine (brand name uvox), citalopram (Celexa), fluoxetine (Prozac), sertraline (Zoloft) and paroxetine (Paxil). These were the ones that were on the market at the start of the CaMos study.
After correlating the data from the bone fractures with the data on the SSRI intake, the results showed that taking SSRI antidepressants every day doubled the risk of "clinical fragility fracture" in adults aged 50 and over, even after taking into account various other factors such as age, hip bone mineral density, and estrogen levels.
The also found a dosage effect, where a 1.5 increase in risk of bone fracture was linked to a doubling of daily dose of SSRI.
Since fragility fractures are already common in the over 50s, this additional risk could have significant health consequences for them.
The motive for the study came from knowing that fragility fractures and depression are not uncommon in the over 50s, and SSRIs are a commonly prescribed medication for depression in this age group. But the researchers were not aware of any studies that had tried to link the two together.
The researchers suggest that doctors should take into account the risk of fragility fracture when they prescribe SSRI antidepressants to patients in this age group.
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are antidepressants used to treat anxiety and personality disorders and depression. They increase the level of serotonin in the brain by stopping it being reabsorbed by the presynpatic cell, which leaves more of it around to produce its mood-altering effects.
"Effect of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors on the Risk of Fracture."
J. Brent Richards, Alexandra Papaioannou, Jonathan D. Adachi, Lawrence Joseph, Heather E. Whitson, Jerilynn C. Prior, David Goltzman.
Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:188-194.
Reader Comments
It is also the first thing that popped up in my mind Deej.
I knew about fluoride having a very high bonding affinity for hydroxy-apatite – which is about the exact same thing that makes up the crystal structures within bone.
I also knew already how most anti-depressants were having fluorine as part of their molecular structure.
So the jump was easily made with bones becoming brittle.
And then, on a second thought, I realized that the way I started to see the phenomenon of fluoridated and/or chlorinated hydrocarbons came from an entirely different angle. This is what particularly aroused me in this article.
And thinking further along this line I came to realize that the amount of ionic (or inorganically ‘bound’) fluoride being taken is already at huge levels today. At least in Europe (but I am not entirely sure) you can read the mg/l of it being present in lots of ‘mineral waters’. It is a lot. And I can not imagine that people who are on prozac (fluoxetine) for instance would get that high amount of fluoride within their system, as they would get already in an inorganic kind of form.
So what is my angle to it?
You can read more about it over here.
http://www.signs-of-the-times.org/signs/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=32517#p32517
What popped out at me was that more than one of the listed antidepressants had at least one flouride atom attached to the structure. Doing a little research, it looks like all but one of the listed drugs has flouride in it - only the structure of Paxil doesn't appear to contain flouride.
If I recall correctly, it's well-documented that flouride has a very strong affinity for bone tissue and has the effect of making bone (and tooth) structure more brittle and prone to breaking.
I'd like to see a comparative study of the rates of bone fracture in meds with flouride and those without.