We all have those images engraved in our memories: the aircraft approaches the skycraper and explodes sending out a fireball against the blue sky; the dust and smoke begins to arise as the towers tremble, collapsing in a vertical free fall, leaving only the ghost of the central core before it, too, evaporates into dust. Over and over again we have watched these clips, on that day and on many days since.

The official story, cobbled together and emitted through the US government's propaganda arms of the mass media, very quickly pinned the blame on Osama bin Laden. The 19 men accused of hijacking the planes, whose names were not on the manifests of any of the flights, became FBI poster boys for Islamic fundamentalism, which itself became a synonym for terror. We were given the shock treatment, and in our daze, the global war on terror was declared in order to, according to its proponents, keep us safe. Rights and liberties in the US and other Western countries were severely curtailed because, we were told, the authorities needed extra power to combat this savage and brutal enemy, an enemy that would stoop to any means to end our way of life because they hated our freedoms.

If they weren't going to play fair, then, by God, neither would we.

But who is this "We"?

An individual defines himself in many ways: by the town in which he is born, by the country in which he is a citizen, by his job, education, language, race, or religion. His education and socialisation shape his consciousness, his awareness, his very perceptual apparati. These differences draw lines and build walls between us, giving us hooks on which to hang our insecurities, hatreds and fears, and which fuel in turn pograms, inquisitions, and crusades that are justified in a circular logic by reference to these differences.

These differences are material differences in the sense that they belong to that part of us that is of this world, the material world, the world we can touch and smell, the world in which we work or offer ourselves as gunfodder for the continuous wars that so mark human history.

However, it is also argued that, ultimately, we are all human, that no matter the other traits that distinghuish us, we all share a common humanity. This noble vision wishes to give us a common ground upon which we can lay down our arms and learn to work together towards peace and harmony, learning to love each other by turning difference into a rich and vast palette of variety than enriches our lives via its myriad colours, tastes, smells, and sounds.

As we said, it is a noble vision. But what if it is wrong?

What if we do not all share a common humanity? What if there are two races on our planet that look human; one, truly human in that its members suffer when they see another's suffering, rejoice when another rejoices, while a second race is devoid of all such sentiments, regarding the world and those who populate it with the cold, detached eye of a machine, able to imitate to a certain degree emotions that it doesn't feel in order to feed upon those who are capable of empathy, all the while calculating its next move as it passes through life feeding off of what it considers the weaknesses of his prey.

These man-machines are psychopaths, "humans" who are so different that their electroencephalograms appear not to have come from "real people":
Several years ago two graduate students and I submitted a paper to a scientific journal. The paper described an experiment in which we had used a biomedical recorder to monitor electrical activity in the brains of several groups of adult men while they performed a language task. This activity was traced on chart paper as a series of waves, referred to as an electroencephalogram.

The editor returned our paper with his apologies. His reason, he told us: "Frankly, we found some of the brain wave patterns depicted in the paper very odd. Those EEGs couldn't have come from real people."

Some of the brain wave recordings were indeed odd, but we hadn't gathered them from aliens and we certainly hadn't made them up. We had obtained them from a class of individuals found in every race, culture, society, and walk of life. Everybody has met these people, been deceived and manipulated by them, and forced to live with or repair the damage they have wrought. These often charming - but always deadly - individuals have a clinical name: psychopaths. [Robert Hare, Without Conscience]
Hare has done much scientific research into the nature of psychopathy. Here is a summary of two of his most famous experiments:
Hare performed two now-famous studies which suggest that psychopaths really are different from the rest of us. In the first, subjects were told to watch a timer counting down to zero, at which point they felt a harmless but painful electric shock. Non-psychopaths showed mounting anxiety and fear.

Psychopaths didn't even sweat.

In the second, the two groups had their brain activity and response time measured when asked to react to groups of letters, some forming words, some not. Words such as "rape" and "cancer" triggered mental jolts in nonpsychopaths. In psychopaths they triggered precisely nothing. [Snakes in suits and how to spot them, By Giles Whittell, The Times, November 11, 2002.]
It is therefore important to understand that these beings, wearing what Hervey Cleckley called The Mask of Sanity [Cleckly's book can be downloaded here], are here among us and are different from us in very basic and profound ways.

Moreover, these psychopaths are in positions of power.
The bad news is that the PCL-R [Hare's psychological test to reveal psychopath traits] revealed that psychopaths are everywhere. Most are non-violent, but all leave a trail of havoc through their families and work environments, using and abusing colleagues and loved ones, endlessly manipulating others, constantly reinventing themselves. Hare puts the average North American incidence of psychopathy at 1 per cent of the population, but the damage they inflict on society is out of all proportion to their numbers, not least because they gravitate to high-profile professions that offer the promise of control over others, such as law, politics, business management ... and journalism.

By the Hare definition there are 300,000 in Canada alone. There are at least as many in Britain — easily enough for you to know one; indeed, enough for you (3,500 of The Times’ 700,000 buyers) to be one. [Ibid]
While 1% of the population might seem small, 300,000 individuals in a small country (population wise) like Canada can do great havoc. What could 3 million do in the US? How many key positions of power are there? How many psychopaths would it take to bend society to their interests and values -- or lack of values?

The really bad news is that they appear to recognise one another and band together to fleece the sheep. And they have a plan.

What if 911 was organised by this race, as an open attack on those who do try to live according to some moral code? As part of a plan to subdue the truly human to the man-machine?

Psychopathy on its own is a serious problem; however, when you combine it with hyperdimensional realities, you're talking the topic of topics, the great secret that has been hidden from mankind for millennia, passed down via an underground stream to those who are willing to look reality squarely in the face without flinching, the fundamental truth that we are not at the top of the food chain, that our world is being controlled and manipulated by beings who are grooming us as feed, whose sole interest in serving humanity is with a pepper sauce.

The question of hyperdimensional reality, psychopathy and the organic portal has been a major focus of this site for many years. Without a knowledge of these topics, the true history of our world, the secret history of our world, cannot be understood. Without a knowledge of these topics, neither can the ultimate truth of 911 be understood.