Welcome to Sott.net
Sun, 16 Jan 2022
The World for People who Think

Health & Wellness


French health authority advises against Moderna COVID-19 vaccine for under 30s

moderna vaccine
© Moderna
France's public health authority has recommended people under 30 be given Pfizer's (PFE.N) Comirnaty COVID-19 vaccine when available instead of Moderna Inc's (MRNA.O) Spikevax jab, which carried comparatively higher risks of heart-related problems.

The Haute Autorite de Sante (HAS), which does not have legal power to ban or licence drugs but acts as an advisor to the French health sector, cited "very rare" risks linked to Myocarditis, a heart disease, that had shown up in recent data on the Moderna vaccine and in a French study published on Monday.

"Within the population aged under 30, this risk appears to be around five times lesser with Pfizer's Comirnaty jab compared to Moderna's Spikevax jab," HAS said in its opinion published on Monday.

The decision in Paris came after regulators in several other countries, including Canada, Finland and Sweden, had also taken a more defensive stance on Spikevax over heart-related safety concerns affecting younger people.

Comment: See also:


New VAERS analysis reveals hundreds of serious adverse events that the CDC and FDA never told us about

They missed hundreds of serious adverse events that are more elevated than myocarditis. A new VAERS analysis done by Albert Benavides blows the doors off the "safe and effective" narrative.

The CDC and FDA have said the vaccines are "safe and effective." They haven't found any serious issues with the COVID vaccines. Zero. Zip. Nada. It was the DoD that found myocarditis.

The evidence in plain sight shows that they are either lying or incompetent. Or both. But of course, the medical community is never going to call them on this.

So that's where our team of vaccine safety experts comes in; to reveal the truth about what is really going on.

In a brand new VAERS data analysis performed by our friend Albert Benavides (aka WelcomeTheEagle88), we found hundreds of serious adverse events that were completely missed by the CDC that should have been mentioned in the informed consent document that are given to patients. And we found over 200 symptoms that occur at a higher relative rate than myocarditis (relative to all previous vaccines over the last 5 years). All together, there were over 4,000 VAERS adverse event codes that were elevated by these vaccines by a factor of 10 or more over baseline that the CDC should have warned people about.

As of November 1, 2021, there have been more adverse events reported for the COVID vaccines than for all 70+ vaccines combined since they started tracking adverse events 30 years ago. That's a stunning statistic, nobody can deny it, but nobody in the mainstream medical community (or mainstream media) seems to care much. It's not even worth noting in passing. Wow.

SOTT Logo Radio

Objective:Health - FDA Gives EUA to Pfizer Shot for 5-11 Year Olds

O:H header
The FDA in the US recently approved the Pfizer Covid vaccine for children aged 5 to 11 for emergency use authorization. This has left a number of people, those who still have the ability to think and aren't just driven by fear, to ask the question "is this really necessary?" or more accurately "isn't this dangerous?" As has been well-publicized, children aren't really affected by Covid to a large extent as there have only been 100 deaths in this age group since the beginning of the pandemic (all of them likely having commorbities).

Children don't really catch Covid, and when they do, they usually don't produce symptoms. Meanwhile, the chance of adverse reactions to the vaccine itself is, at the very least, not negligible. In fact, Dr. Toby Rogers recently conducted his own risk-benefit analysis (since Pfizer, the FDA and the CDC haven't bothered to do one) and found that the vaccine would kill 117 in order to save 1 life - and that was a conservative estimate.

Is this just a money grab or is there something more sinister going on here?

Join us on this episode of Objective:Health as we discuss the case.

For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:

♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
♥Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channel/objectivehealth
♥LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@objectivehealth:f
♥Odysee: https://odysee.com/@objectivehealth:f

And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here:


Running Time: 00:35:24

Download: MP3 — 32.4 MB


Return of scurvy under Tory rule as cases of Victorian illness double in decade

© Getty Images
Deadly scurvy killed sailors.
Shadow Health Secretary Jonathan Ashworth said the huge rise in cases of Victorian illness scurvy, along with the tripling of hospital admissions for malnutrition since 2010, was 'a shameful indictment on a decade of the Tories'.

Cases of scurvy - a widespread illness in Victorian times - have more than doubled in a decade.

NHS Digital statistics also reveal hospital admissions for malnutrition have tripled since the Conservatives came to power in the 2010 election.

The increases coincide with soaring numbers of people relying on food banks in the wake of austerity policies.

Comment: How can any nation refer to itself as "first world" when they have over 10,000 reported cases of malnutrition and increasing cases of scurvy?

See also:


What's behind the strange drop in American body temperatures over the past 200 years? - new study

person thermometer body temperature
© Tim Hawley/DigitalVision/Getty Images
The human body is often said to rest at a healthy internal temperature of 37 degrees Celsius, or 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit.

This average was established two centuries ago in France, and yet in the meantime, it seems our 'normal' physiology has changed ever so slightly.

Early last year, researchers in the United States combed Civil War veteran records and national health surveys and found temperatures among men born at the turn of this century were 0.59 degrees Celsius cooler than those men born around two hundred years earlier.

Women, on the other hand, had seen a 0.32 degrees Celsius decline since the 1890s.

At the time, the authors suggested it might have something to do with inflammation due to disease, which is closely tied to body temperature. With the rise of modern medicine, we've seen a decline in chronic infections, and maybe, the authors suggested, this has chilled us out, so to speak.

Comment: One benefit of a higher internal body temperature is an increased ability to fight off viral infection, and in the first half of the 20th century mainstream medicine acknowledged its benefits and practised it in the form of pyrotherapy. Although it seems that this kind of therapy has been practised for hundreds - if not thousands - of years, one such method is cold therapy, like ice swimming, another is sauna.

See also: Also check out SOTT radio's: The Health & Wellness Show: The benefits of cold adaptation


Vaccine injury stories pour in after Israeli mom launches project to expose untold suffering

pfizer vaccine
A courageous woman has taken up the task of investigating and reporting injuries from the Pfizer COVID jab that the media have ignored in her home country of Israel, where the government has administered the shot almost ubiquitously.

Introducing herself as Avital, a mother of two boys, the brave Israeli woman said she has spoken with "hundreds of people" and "read thousands of testimonies" of people who have been adversely affected by the jab but who have been afraid to speak publicly "due to hostility around this subject."

"In the past months, I've been hearing about more and more people I know who experienced severe adverse effects shortly after receiving the Pfizer shot. I also noticed that no news company, journalist, reporter, or anyone investigated these events thoroughly and published the data," Avital said.

Comment: Also see:


No surprise: New study shows dramatic decline in COVID vaccine effectivenes

vaccine vacuna
© CC0 / Pexels
As the Delta variant became the dominant strain of the coronavirus across the United States, all three COVID-19 vaccines available to Americans lost some of their protective power, with vaccine efficacy among a large group of veterans dropping between 35% and 85%, according to a new study.

Researchers who scoured the records of nearly 800,000 U.S. veterans found that in early March, just as the Delta variant was gaining a toehold across American communities, the three vaccines were roughly equal in their ability to prevent infections.

But over the next six months, that changed dramatically.

By the end of September, Moderna's two-dose COVID-19 vaccine, measured as 89% effective in March, was only 58% effective.

The effectiveness of shots made by Pfizer and BioNTech, which also employed two doses, fell from 87% to 45% in the same period.

And most strikingly, the protective power of Johnson & Johnson's single-dose vaccine plunged from 86% to just 13% over those six months.

Comment: Baloney. See comment above.

Blue Planet

Gene common in south Asian people doubles risk of Covid death, study finds

India coronavirus vaccine
© Indranil Mukherjee/AFP/Getty Images
A man holds his arm after receiving a dose of coronavirus vaccine in Mumbai, India.
Scientists have identified a gene that doubles the risks of respiratory failure and death from Covid and could explain why people of south Asian heritage are more vulnerable to the disease.

The gene, which changes the way the lungs respond to infection, is the most important genetic risk factor identified so far and is carried by roughly 60% of people with south Asian backgrounds, compared with 15% of those with white European backgrounds. The finding could partly explain the excess deaths seen in some communities in the UK and the impact of Covid-19 in the Indian subcontinent.

Prof James Davies, a geneticist at Oxford University's Radcliffe Department of Medicine and a senior author of the paper, said: "The genetic factor we have found explains why some people get very seriously ill after coronavirus infection ... There's a single gene that confers quite a significant risk to people of south Asian background."

Comment: Research showing how medications and illnesses affect the two genders and the various races of people differently is an area of research that is receiving increased attention. This study also highlights how risky global, blanket roll outs of these generic and experimental injections are:


Risk-benefit analysis of Pfizer COVID vaccine in children 5 to 11 fails, shows at least 117 deaths to save one life

Risk benefit
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's risk-benefit assessment in connection with Pfizer's application for emergency use of its COVID vaccine for children 5 to 11 describes only relative risks in an older population. It ignores absolute risk and also the standard calculation for measuring a drug's effectiveness — Number Needed To Vaccinated (NNTV).

Comment: If the health authorities had any genuine concern for safeguarding the health of the people, they would immediately halt the rollout of this toxic and ineffective medical experiment on young children. But in light of the disturbing statistics presented above, it is glaringly obvious that the medical-industrial complex and their associated corrupt health officials are concerned chiefly with gaining personal profit at the cost of thousands of children's lives. One would hope that parents would see through the facade and reject this criminal procedure, but it looks as though many will accept, and unfortunately it is children who will suffer the consequences. As the author rightly states, "the vaccine juggernaut marches on."

For more information, see the following:


Preventing and Treating Chronic COVID and COVID Vaccine Complications

Spike Protein
No issue in the history of medicine has been as strident and polarized as that of the risk/benefit profiles of the various COVID vaccines being administered around the world. This article does not seek to clarify this issue to the satisfaction of either the pro-vaccine or the anti-vaccine advocates. However, all parties should realize that some toxicity does result in some vaccinated individuals some of the time, and that such toxicity can sometimes be unequivocally attributed to the preceding administration of the vaccine. Whether this toxicity occurs often enough and with great enough severity in vaccinated persons to be of greater concern than dealing with the contraction and evolution of COVID infections remains the question for many people.

Practically speaking, it does not matter whether an adverse event that occurs after a vaccination gets "blamed" on the vaccination. Such a matter may never get resolved. The issue of greatest concern is whether that adverse event can be clinically resolved if not effectively prevented, and whether any long-term damage to the body can be prevented once an adverse event is recognized. The remainder of this article will address the causes of such damage along with measures that can mitigate or even resolve such damage.

Comment: See also: