Welcome to Sott.net
Wed, 26 Jan 2022
The World for People who Think

Health & Wellness


Risk-benefit analysis of Pfizer COVID vaccine in children 5 to 11 fails, shows at least 117 deaths to save one life

Risk benefit
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's risk-benefit assessment in connection with Pfizer's application for emergency use of its COVID vaccine for children 5 to 11 describes only relative risks in an older population. It ignores absolute risk and also the standard calculation for measuring a drug's effectiveness — Number Needed To Vaccinated (NNTV).

Comment: If the health authorities had any genuine concern for safeguarding the health of the people, they would immediately halt the rollout of this toxic and ineffective medical experiment on young children. But in light of the disturbing statistics presented above, it is glaringly obvious that the medical-industrial complex and their associated corrupt health officials are concerned chiefly with gaining personal profit at the cost of thousands of children's lives. One would hope that parents would see through the facade and reject this criminal procedure, but it looks as though many will accept, and unfortunately it is children who will suffer the consequences. As the author rightly states, "the vaccine juggernaut marches on."

For more information, see the following:


Preventing and Treating Chronic COVID and COVID Vaccine Complications

Spike Protein
No issue in the history of medicine has been as strident and polarized as that of the risk/benefit profiles of the various COVID vaccines being administered around the world. This article does not seek to clarify this issue to the satisfaction of either the pro-vaccine or the anti-vaccine advocates. However, all parties should realize that some toxicity does result in some vaccinated individuals some of the time, and that such toxicity can sometimes be unequivocally attributed to the preceding administration of the vaccine. Whether this toxicity occurs often enough and with great enough severity in vaccinated persons to be of greater concern than dealing with the contraction and evolution of COVID infections remains the question for many people.

Practically speaking, it does not matter whether an adverse event that occurs after a vaccination gets "blamed" on the vaccination. Such a matter may never get resolved. The issue of greatest concern is whether that adverse event can be clinically resolved if not effectively prevented, and whether any long-term damage to the body can be prevented once an adverse event is recognized. The remainder of this article will address the causes of such damage along with measures that can mitigate or even resolve such damage.

Comment: See also:


CDC emails: Our definition of vaccine is "problematic"

Susan Walsh-Pool Anthony Fauci
The CDC caused an uproar in early September 2021, after it changed its definitions of "vaccination" and "vaccine." For years, the CDC had set definitions for vaccination/vaccine that discussed immunity. This all changed on September 1, 2021.

The prior CDC Definitions of Vaccine and Vaccination (August 26, 2021):
Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person's immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.

Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.

Comment: "Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right." - George Orwell, 1984

See also:


First traditional homemade Covid vaccine approved for use but not in Australia!

Nikolai Petrovsky
© Flinders University
Nikolai Petrovsky, Professor of Medicine at Flinders University and Research Director of Australian biotech company Vaxine Pty Ltd.
Who knew? The first traditional vaccine for Covid that's based on protein anywhere in the world has been approved for use. It was designed in Australia, but can't be used here. The Professor of the team that invented it received no help from the Australian Government, and is about to be sacked from Flinders University because he won't take the mandatory Pfizer, Astra Zenica or Moderna injections. What would he know — he's just a vaccine developer?

Instead of the committee-approved ones, has taken his own vaccine called Covax-19 or Spikogen. It has just been approved for use in Iran where Stage 2 and 3 trials were conducted. He said he would stand by his vaccine and even accept liability, unlike all the current vaccine makers who demand waivers.

Professor Nicolai Petrovsky is hopeful though, that after "the excellent Phase 3 trial results" he will be able to get approval in many countries, maybe even in Australia? But our government-funded TGA won't consider it until his team pays over $300,000 so they can assess it.

You'd never know the Australian government was trying to save Australians lives, or give our citizens more choices. Perhaps because they aren't? If they were interested, they would surely find a way to fast track the assessment process and cover the trivial cost of reading a report from Iran. The Government has spent $1.9 billion on other vaccines, but can't find 300k for the most successful Australian vaccine in years?

The situation is so comic, Petrovsky has had to resort to crowdfunding, so they can afford to pay our government to get approval. They have set up a GoFundMe page, which has already raised $290,000 out of the $326,000 already.

I've donated. (Don't call me anti-vax, I put money into vaccine research 🙂 )

GoFundMe: Bring Covax-19 Vaccine back to Australia

Judging by the comments there, there are already a thousand volunteers for a trial here.

Petrovsky tells us there are great results from the latest trial in Iran but he can't make the results public yet. (He's hoping his papers on that will be accepted so he can). He claims they meet all the FDA and other requirements to be approved. Apparently, in animal tests, after vaccination, they can challenge the animals with live virus and not only do they not fall sick, the team can find no recoverable virus in challenge tests, which is excellent. There's no transmission to other animals either. He calls the vaccine "quasi sterilizing". If it's a lot less leaky that "all the rest", it may even help mop up the nastier mutations we're probably making by giving millions of people very leaky vaccines. Wouldn't that be something?

Covax-19 apparently causes few side effects. Petrovsky claims there is no thrombosis, no fever, no myocarditis, and no myocardial infarction. No one needs to take a day off work...


FDA grants vaccine emergency use authorization for children age 5-11: 'We're never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it'

Eyes closed
"I do think it's a relatively close call - it's really going to be a question of what the prevailing conditions are but we're never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it."

In the end, it wasn't really a close call at all, and no one really thought it would be. After all, government health officials in the United States, the United Kingdom, Israel, and other countries have been talking about the "urgent need" to start vaccinating children as young as five for weeks now, if not longer. But the words above, spoken by FDA advisor Dr. Eric Rubin of Harvard University, succinctly and chillingly summarized the decision of the FDA to grant emergency use approval (EUA) to Pfizer BioNTech's coronavirus "vaccine" for children between the ages of five and eleven. "We're never going to learn about how safe it is until we give it."

Comment: See also:


Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer's vaccine trial

Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer's pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Paul D Thacker reports.
Pfizer Vaccine
© Reuters
In autumn 2020 Pfizer's chairman and chief executive, Albert Bourla, released an open letter to the billions of people around the world who were investing their hopes in a safe and effective covid-19 vaccine to end the pandemic. "As I've said before, we are operating at the speed of science," Bourla wrote, explaining to the public when they could expect a Pfizer vaccine to be authorised in the United States.1

But, for researchers who were testing Pfizer's vaccine at several sites in Texas during that autumn, speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety. A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer's pivotal phase III trial. Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding. After repeatedly notifying Ventavia of these problems, the regional director, Brook Jackson, emailed a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Ventavia fired her later the same day. Jackson has provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails.


New tick-borne virus Yezo discovered in Japan

yezv virus
© Kodama et al., doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25857-0.
Transmission electron microscopy of YEZV particles negatively stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid.
Orthonairoviruses are tick-borne viruses in the genus Orthonairovirus, the family Nairoviridae.

They cause sometimes fatal febrile illnesses in humans and other animals.

Of 15 species within the genus, four species comprise known human pathogens: Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, Nairobi sheep disease virus, Dugbe virus, and Kasokero virus.

The newly-discovered orthonairovirus, named Yezo virus (YEZV), is the causative agent of an acute febrile illness characterized by thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and elevation of liver enzymes and ferritin.

Comment: See also:


Let's play whack a mole: Even your trusted GP is not averse to wielding the club of doom

The door is flung wide open to government-backed, bullying minions sent to divide people into opposing camps: the clean and socially responsible separated from the unclean and morally reprehensible who are to be bludgeoned into submission.

Vaccination AKA gene therapy is the holy grail, the path to purity, the hope of survival in a future living with Covid-19.

"Keep others safe" these supercharged Neanderthals screech at those refusing gene therapy. "Do the right thing or suffer the consequences!" Large clubs of doom swing wildly over the heads of those friends, family and colleagues rejecting gene therapy and ducking for cover.

Comment: See also:


Winning the war against therapeutic nihilism

© Wikimedia Commons
The Nihilist, Paul Merwart (1855-1902)
Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist and trained epidemiologist, not only sees patients every week but is the editor of two medical journals and has published hundreds of peer-reviewed papers. Prior to the pandemic, he was involved in the interface between heart disease and kidney disease — but that all changed.

McCullough is now a "hunted doctor" who's been threatened with disciplinary actions, including suspension or revocation of his medical license, by the American Board of Internal Medicine for the "dissemination of misinformation."1 He stepped forward during the COVID-19 pandemic because he saw something very wrong was going on early in 2020, and he felt compelled to do something about it.

In the video above, you can view McCullough's October 2, 2021, presentation at the 78th Annual Meeting of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.2 I urge you to set aside one hour to view it in its entirety, as it's packed with data that call into question the true motivations behind the mass injection campaign, which he believes should have been shut down in January.


Covid vaccinations 'not sufficient' in preventing Delta variant spread, almost equal to unvaccinated - UK study

covid vaccine center
© Andrew Milligan/Pool via REUTERS
A new study has found that though Covid-19 vaccinations lower the chance of hospitalization and death in the case of infections, those inoculated can spread the Delta variant as easily as those not.

Researchers looked at over 600 people in the UK over the course of a year for the study, done by Imperial College London and the UK Health Security Agency (HSA) and published this week in The Lancet Infectious Diseases journal.

"Although vaccines remain highly effective at preventing severe disease and deaths from COVID-19, our findings suggest that vaccination is not sufficient to prevent transmission of the Delta variant in household settings with prolonged exposures," the study declares.

In their analysis of "densely sampled household contacts exposed to the Delta variant," researchers found 38% of those unvaccinated got Covid, while 25% of those vaccinated got it.

Comment: Question still remains, people aren't tested for variants, just whether they had covid or not. So how were they able to determine which variant is being spread? See also: