OF THE
TIMES
A United Nations affiliate removed a report accusing Israel of apartheid from the internet following a request from the secretary-general of the international body.
Antonio Guterres asked the U.N. Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, or EWCWA, to remove the report, which was published Wednesday and says it "establishes, on the basis of scholarly inquiry and overwhelming evidence, that Israel is guilty of the crime of apartheid," Reuters reported Friday.
Rima Khalaf, the commission's chief, resigned because of Gutteres' pressure to remove the report, according to Reuters.
As of shortly after noon Friday, a previous link to the report yielded an error message and the report was not listed among the publications on the website for the ESCWA, an agency based in Beirut, Lebanon that is comprised of 18 Arab member states, including what is identified as the State of Palestine.
A U.N. spokesman had said earlier that the report was published without consulting the international body's Secretariat and "does not reflect the views of the secretary-general."
The United States and Israel sharply criticized the report.
"The United States is outraged by the report," Nikki Haley, the U.S. envoy to the U.N., said Wednesday in a statement. "The United Nations Secretariat was right to distance itself from this report, but it must go further and withdraw the report altogether."
Israel's U.N. ambassador, Danny Danon, said in a statement: "The attempt to smear and falsely label the only true democracy in the Middle East by creating a false analogy is despicable and constitutes a blatant lie."
If we engage in Times-style gilding of every lily the leakers throw our way, and in doing so build up a fever of expectations for a bombshell reveal, but there turns out to be no conspiracy - Trump will be pre-inoculated against all criticism for the foreseeable future.And now, as The Intercept's Glenn Greenwald writes, key Democratic officials are now warning their base not to expect...
While the Pentagon claims that it targeted a meeting hall full of terrorists, organizations which Washington considers "reputable", such as the UK-based Syrian Observatory on Human Rights and the White Helmets group, clearly stated that a mosque was destroyed. Washington apparently only considers sources "credible" when it suits their pitch of the story, retired US Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski told RT.
"If they can find somebody to verify what they want to put out, then the White Helmets report will be fine, otherwise, they are not credible," Kwiatkowski said.
"The White Helmets have been notoriously unreliable on a lot of things and yet the US military and the Pentagon has been very happy to reference them as a credible resource in the past and I'm sure in the future they will as well," she stressed.
The Pentagon's version also contradicts the video and witness accounts from the scene. Footage from the scene provided by the pro-opposition Qasioun News shows the aftermath and the destruction of the Al-Jinah mosque.
Other videos widely available online also show wide-scale destruction from the strike, although is impossible to definitely verify footage coming from the rebel-controlled area.
...
The Russian Defense Ministry earlier on Friday also asked Washington for an explanation, after a piece of an American missile was found at the site. Meanwhile, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said there was no doubt the US missiles were indeed intended for terrorists.
"We have no doubt that the US forces were aiming at terrorists," Zakharova said, adding, that while tragic mistakes that claim the lives of civilians do happen at war, unlike "some of our opponents, we are not going to blame them for 'intentional' killing of civilians and destruction of infrastructure."
Comment: It's been obvious from the get-go that Russia didn't hack the elections and undoubtedly these intelligence officials knew that, so what caused their abrupt turn around?