Host Lester Holt asked:
"I have to draw your attention to that Army report, an investigative report that's come out about the lead-up to the withdrawal from Afghanistan. It interviewed many military officials and officers who said the administration ignored the handwriting on the wall, another described trying to get folks in the embassy ready to evacuate and encountering people who were in โ essentially in denial of the situation. Does any of that ring true to you?"Biden responded, "No, no. That's not what I was told."
Holt then asked:
"That you were told that the U.S. administration officials were prepared, they knew it was time to get out?"Biden answered,
"No. What I was told โ no one told me that โ look, there was no good time to get out. But if we had not gotten out, they acknowledged that we would have had to put a hell of a lot more troops back in. It wasn't just 2,000, 4,000. We would have had to significantly increase the number of troops, and we're back in this war of attrition. And there was no way we were ever going to unite Ukraine โ I mean, excuse me, Iraq โ Afghanistan, no way that was going to happen. And so, this was a much wiser thing to do."Holt then asked:
"I just want to clarify, are you rejecting the conclusions or the accounts that are in this Army report?"Biden responded, "Yes, I am." He added, "I'm rejecting them."
Still not arresting this guy ??? But no one has noticed, that he is really a MENTALLY ILL ??? He doesn't even know where he's sitting, the poor wretch ....
I believe that the refusal of the United States (and the obligation imposed on the European member states of NATO to adopt the same attitude) to discuss with Russia the three key conditions proposed by President Vladimir Putin (the cessation of the expansion of NATO, the non-deployment of offensive weapon systems near Russia's borders, and the return to NATO's military infrastructure in Europe from 1997) misses a vital detail.
We are witnessing a PsyOps campaign (psychological warfare) operation conducted by the Western media, full of gross fakes and blatant misinformation. The aim is to portray Russia as a military giant that has already decided to occupy the whole of Europe in a matter of days. To reinforce this perception in public opinion, the Pentagon has transferred thousands of US servicemen from its elite forces overseas to defend Europe, unattacked by anyone. In the long and medium term, I consider the consequences of this media campaign to be catastrophic for the United States and its vassals in NATO.
After the fall of the Iron Curtain, there was the aggression of the former Yugoslavia by the US-led NATO, the invasion of Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya. All of this was based on an established model of American naval superiority, built around carrier groups that could attack a country thousands of miles from American territory. Since the countries attacked were unable to retaliate with strikes on the territory of the aggressors, the Western public became accustomed to watching this tragic spectacle on television, like a football match.
But if attacked, Russia will not hesitate for a second to strike the territory of all NATO member states in Europe and the United States. Because Russia has many conventional and nuclear means capable of doing this. Amid public hysteria for nearly a year, thanks to Western media PsyOps, over Russia, the Russian military's long-range strikes will have a devastating effect on civilian morale.
A distant war, which we see through television, is not perceived in the same way as when bombs fall in your yard, your house, the street, etc. Remember the impact of the attack on the twin towers in New York on September 11, 2001.
It is obvious that President Joe Biden, when he refused to discuss the three conditions posed by Vladimir Putin, did not consulted no one on the crucial question, which is: how will American civilians react in this situation?