If you saw New World Next Year 2022, you'll know that I think a cyber 9/11 (and the ensuing passage of an iPatriot Act) is a distinct possibility for the coming year. But that is not the only Ace card in the would-be world controllers' hands.
A "pandemic of the injected" and/or a 5G-generated global health crisis?
The passage of a global pandemic treaty to hardwire the biosecurity state into place?
A bioterror false flag?
Check. Check. Check. All of these cards, too, are in the deck and ready to be dealt. But there is another card in that deck that has been largely neglected for the past two years and I have a feeling we're going to see it laid on the table this year.
So what am I talking about? Luckily, I don't need to look further than the latest headlines to illustrate my point:
Right on the heels of the Kazakhstan fiasco, we have this headline dominating the newswires: "White House: Russia prepping pretext for Ukraine invasion." As the loyal government stenographers over at the Associated Press helpfully explain:
US intelligence officials have determined a Russian effort is underway to create a pretext for its troops to further invade Ukraine, and Moscow has already prepositioned operatives to conduct 'a false-flag operation' in eastern Ukraine, according to the White House.Wait, what? The White House is now openly warning about the potential for a false flag operation to be used as a pretext for war? What's happening here?
The invocation of the concept of false flag terror in a mainstream media report (let alone such an assertion coming from the lips of "intelligence officials") might raise an eyebrow among us old hands of the 9/11 Truth movement. I'm sure we all remember the days when the very concept of false flag terror had to be painstakingly explained to the average normie . . . so it could then be summarily dismissed as a "conspiracy theory."
But upon closer examination, this acknowledgment of the reality that false flag attacks can be used as a casus belli is not so surprising. In fact, the most vocal conspiracy deniers are only too happy to become conspiracy theorists themselves when discussing their political enemies (like Putin or Assad or Putin or Xi or "anti-vaxxers" or Putin).
In this case, the theory posits that Putin and the Russkies have engaged in a social media campaign to plant a narrative that the Ukranian government is preparing to target Russian-backed forces in eastern Ukraine. The plan would then unfold when Russian "operatives trained in urban warfare" (who, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki assures us, have already been deployed) "use explosives to carry out acts of sabotage against Russia's own proxy forces." Putin could then use the attacks as a pretext to invade Ukraine.
That's one hell of a conspiracy theory, isn't it? So what evidence is there to back it up? As you might have guessed, absolutely no evidence of any kind was presented during the briefing announcing this startling accusation. Don't take my word for it, read Psaki's remarks for yourself and you'll see that the entire story rests on her bald assertion that "we have information" that Russia is preparing to do this. Or, translated from the Globalese: "Take our word for it."
But wait, it gets worse! Just weeks ago The New York Times was reporting that the US and Britain are helping the Ukrainian government to secure their cyber infrastructure against dastardly Russian hackers and, just days ago, the Ukrainian ambassador to the US told CBS News that Ukraine was expecting cyberattacks to precede a full invasion. And now — wouldn't you know it? — just as the EU is prepping large-scale exercises simulating Russian cyberattacks on Europe's supply lines, someone has gone ahead and launched a cyberattack on the Ukrainian government!
So who is that "someone"? Oh, come on, there's no time to collect evidence! We all know who it is! After all, cyberattacks against their enemies are a "tried and true part of the Russian playbook" according to good ol' Victoria "F**k the EU" Nuland (aka Mrs. Robert Kagan), and who wouldn't trust her?
So is it possible that things are playing out exactly as Psaki and Nuland assert? Could this really be a carefully staged Russian operation to prepare the way for an invasion of Ukraine? Of course it is possible. Let's not be naive here. Putin is an authoritarian who is putting Russia in lockstep with the Great Reset and he is willing to stage terror attacks and assassinate his enemies in order to further his own political ambitions.
The same can be said for Xi and Assad and all of the other authoritarians who are held up in certain parts of the "alternative" media as the "resistance" to the NATO agenda. As I've articulated many times, the BRICS are a phony opposition, the "alternative" financial infrastructure that the anti-NATO crowd is setting up is not alternative at all, the economic and military rise of the Chinese has been deliberately engineered by the same financial interests that built up the American empire, the technocrats openly lust after the authoritarian powers of communist China and the Belt and Road promise is just debt diplomacy by another name.
But here's something that seems to confuse those who are clued in to the 3D reality behind the 2D chess game: geopolitical and even military conflict can still take place, even in a scenario where both enemies are just puppets of the same string-puller.
As I've laid out before, there is a very real sense in which we are already embroiled in World War III, and that is the War on You. The Powers That Shouldn't Be are, as we know by now, willing and capable of doing anything it takes to maintain their power and increase the centralization of power in the technocratic hands of the oligarchy. If that means an economic crash, don't doubt for a moment that they'll do it. If that means bringing down the world wide web (in order to replace it with a more controlled system), they'll do that, too. And thermonuclear war? If it helps their agenda, it's on the table.
This is the element of the global calculation that has been excluded from the equation the past two years and is likely to come back with a vengeance this year: geopolitical strife. Remember in 2019 when dueling drills and a world on fire with protest were portents of some major changes that were due to take place on the global chessboard? Well, those tectonic forces didn't go away during the scamdemic, they were merely pushed under the surface for a while. But, like a beach ball pushed under water and then let go, they're surfacing once again.
Think of what we've seen just in the past month.
There's the latest round of war talk over Ukraine and the unprecedented deployment of CSTO forces to Kazakhstan.
There's the new hypersonic missile arms race, with China gloating about their latest version of the "wonder weapon," North Korea testing their own batch and the US' own AGM-183A failing its third test . . . which is just an excuse for the Navy to increase its weapons development and procurement budget, of course.
Australia and Japan are signing security pacts as tensions grow between US and China in East Asia. Meanwhile, geopolitical experts are warning US policy planners against waging a two-front cold war (just pick an enemy and stick with them, please!).
Oh, and does anybody remember Afghanistan? Or Iraq? Or Syria? It seems there's still stuff happening in those places, too.
Yes, the world is a tinderbox looking for a spark at the moment, and the scamdemic with its convenient narratives of "the Chinese virus" and "our forces are ravaged by COVID!" (or is that "our forces are ravaged by COVID mandates"?) is just more fuel for the fire.
The coming conflict(s) will be directed, financed, managed and engineered by 3D chess players, of course, but that doesn't mean that such conflict won't happen. The WWI Conspiracy led to WWI, after all, so what do you think the the WWIII Conspiracy will lead to? I hope we don't find out this year, but I have a feeling we're going to be hearing more about geopolitics in 2022 than we have in a long time.
Reader Comments
Is he saying they're all in on it, its a new age game? Breaking the eggs to make the new age luciferian technocracy omelets?
Few will remember the expression. Just twenty years have passed: in 2002 President George W. Bush (son), unable to order NATO (defensive alliance) to invade Iraq, promoted a coalition of the willing to overthrow the Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein under false accusation to possess weapons of mass destruction. Of the 43 states and small states that joined (including some Pacific islands) the only nations that sent troops to Iraq to actually fight for the dirty need were, besides obviously the USA, Great Britain, Australia and - to his shame - Poland (Italy sent troops after the conflict, after occupation).
It was the great feat of what were called the "neocons, practically all Jews who had filled the high seats of the Pentagon, and wanted, by destabilizing and occupying oil-filled Iraq, to eliminate a danger to Israel.
Obviously, this Farkas is Jewish too (like Victoria Nuland, the organizer of the coup that took Ukraine away from Russia), and evidently aspires to emulate the neocon glories: by waging war on Russia, possibly preventive, with a "coalition di volonterosi ”constituted ad hoc to the order of the USA.
Elyn Farkas wrote it in Defense One military magazine, report her article [Link] as an illustration of a hostile mentality, with delusional and psychopathic traits of anti-Russian hatred, which is gaining ground in the sectors of the "democratic party" in power in the USA.
NATO has started deploying its troops in Ukraine.
Contrary to statements by NATO countries that Alliance units will not be deployed on the territory of Ukraine, it is known that Canada has deployed its special forces in Ukraine (and, according to several sources, in the Donbass). The data on the subject is provided by the Global News channel [Link] , noting that it is a small group of soldiers, probably several dozen people.
Canadian special forces troops have been deployed to Ukraine amid mounting tensions between the NATO military alliance and Russia. The deployment of a small contingent of the Canadian Special Operations Regiment occurred when diplomatic talks aimed at preventing the armed conflict in Ukraine stalled.
The presence of Canadian special forces is part of an attempt by NATO allies to contain Russian aggression in Ukraine and determine ways to help the Ukrainian government. The unit was also tasked with helping develop evacuation plans for Canadian diplomatic personnel in the event of a full-scale invasion.......
For obvious reasons, Canada does not make official statements on this matter, however, making public the deployment of Canadian troops to Ukraine will inevitably lead to retaliatory measures by Russia, including the deployment of Russian peacekeepers in the Donbass.
More???
The third British military transport plane arrived in Ukraine in one day, delivering unknown weapons to the Ukrainian military. Despite the previous claim that we are talking about the supply of light anti-tank systems, experts note that it could have been done on one side, however, as it turns out, the data that London is carrying out the transfer of Brimstone missiles to Ukraine may very well be true.
As it turned out, in addition to the arrival of the weapons themselves in Ukraine, a small group of British soldiers were also transferred here. Against the backdrop of the sending of Canadian special forces to Ukraine, this could indicate the fact that NATO is building its group in this country, preparing for a special operation to seize the Donbass.
What kind of weapons can be discussed is still unknown, however, the supply of weapons by three military transport aircraft at once indicates that we are not just talking about anti-tank missile systems announced by British Defense Secretary Ben Wallace.
Experts fear that, having received a significant amount of anti-tank systems, the Ukrainian armed forces may begin targeting the civilian population in the DPR and LPR with them.
The sharp increase in the risk of a military conflict between Russia and Ukraine forced the Russian side to begin evacuating diplomats from the territory of this country, it is the evacuation of 30 Russian diplomats from the embassy in Kiev and from the consulate in Lvov. At the same time, 18 Russian diplomats had already left Ukraine in early January. This indicates that Russia highly values the risks of military confrontations. There are currently no official comments on the evacuation of Russian diplomats from Ukraine, however, experts attribute it to a direct threat to the diplomats themselves, as an unknown threw a Molotov cocktail into the fence of the Russian consulate in Lvov, or with the threat of real military clashes between Russia and Ukraine against the background of the situation in the Donbass.
The American edition of the NYT invented a story about the evacuation of Russian diplomats from Ukraine
The American side, through the major media, is trying to aggravate the situation in relations between Russia and Ukraine. So, they began to spread rumors about the evacuation of Russian diplomats from Kiev.
An article on this topic was published by the eminent edition of The New York Times, according to the Strana.ua portal. Allegedly a week before talks with the Americans, NATO and the OSCE on security assurance projects, Russia began to withdraw its diplomatic staff and their families from embassies and consulates in Ukraine.The newspaper even had “accurate” information that on January 5, 18 people (children and wives of diplomats) went by bus to Moscow. The Americans cite sources in the Security Service of Ukraine who claim that 30 more people will leave Kiev and Lvov in the coming days.The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has already responded to the NYT stuffing and denied the baseless rumors. Representatives of the department noted that there was no evacuation and the embassy was operating normally.Washington clearly decided that fairy tales only about “aggression” and “invasion” would not be enough. They decided to back them up with accusations that Russia was taking away its diplomats. It is possible that the story about the evacuation was prepared along with the future “attack” of the Russian Federation on Ukraine and was supposed to reinforce it.
THE SAME UKRAINE DOES NOT BELIEVE IN A RUSSIAN INVASION. BUT THE CIA HAS OTHER PLANS.
[Link]
Member of the Slovak Parliament: Americans are dragging Slovakia into a military conflict with Russia.
According to the American New York Times, Ukrainian mercenaries will prepare in Slovakia for a possible conflict with Russia.
The Slovak Republic has never been so close to war!
This scandalous information for a prestigious American newspaper was confirmed by sources in the American administration. In addition to Slovakia, Poland and Romania are mentioned.In the same way that (once) the Americans trained the Afghan Mujadins, including Osama bin Laden, they want to train Ukrainian nationalists to fight the Russians.Thus, Slovakia will become a direct part of the military conflict against Russia, and our territory will become the primary target for a possible attack – the Americans want to involve us in this!
The prestigious American media would not just publish such information. The Slovak side had to give its consent so that the Americans could count on our territory.
-I would just like to remind you that Secretary of Defense Yaroslav Nagy completed his foreign trip to the US in October. Since he returned, he has accelerated to knock out a controversial defense agreement for the Americans that allows US bases in Slovakia.-
He, apparently, was instructed in the United States to prepare the ground for the introduction of American troops, including instructors who will train Ukrainian terrorists in the fight against Russia. The Slovak public learns about Nagy’s promises from the American media. And our media is silent.
If the political scientist Eduard Khmelar had not pointed this out, they would have continued to hush it up.I repeat – Slovakia has never been so close to war since the beginning of its existence. I don’t mean conflicts now on the other side of the world, somewhere in Iraq or Afghanistan.We are now talking about the fraternal Slavic people – about Russia, with which our great Ludovit Stur connected us, and which liberated us from fascism. About Russia, on which we are energy dependent.And suddenly we learn from the New York Times that the Americans are planning to train Ukrainian forces against our fraternal people – there has never been such a scandal in Slovakia.Not only do they want to transfer our territory to the Americans, exclude it from our jurisdiction and allow the Americans to bring here whatever they want, they are directly drawing us into a military conflict with Russia.
They put Slovakia in military danger and do not even want to provoke a public debate on this issue – even the Latin American junta in the 1980s would not allow this.Slovaks do not want war with Russia! They don’t want the Americans to train Ukrainian terrorists here! They don’t want the Slovak government to negotiate the conflict behind our back, which makes us the target of counterattacks.We do not want to be the Central European “Pakistan” of the US Army! We do not want to be an American training ground or an American base!If President Zuzana Caputova knew about this and did not inform the Slovak public, she should resign. And if, as the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, she did not know this, then the entire government should resign within a second.This is where all the jokes end – the most important thing will be taken away from us. They’re going to take peace from us! "
Lubos Blaga, Member of the National Council (Parliament) of the Slovak Republic
[Link]