OF THE
TIMES
If ignorance is truly bliss, then why do so many Americans need Prozac?
I see McDonalds, I think of this song [Link]
Putin has consistently demonstrated a much higher level of rationality, knowledge and connection with his countrymen than any western leader has...
Another great bloody big yawn of a needless undertaking by all the usual suspects for all the usual shop worn "reasons"...
Nobody is taking Macron seriously. He has lost the plot with his insane suggestions about sending French troops into the Ukrainian meat grinder....
... It's a shame those people had to go through that. I'm glad they are alive.
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Reader Comments
This video, (on today's Thetruthseeker UK at [Link] ) focuses (pun intended) on the indications that Kubrik was behind the filmwork, which also would make it easier to keep it secret, contra all of the thousands of 'imagineers' at Disney. So check this video out:
[Link] (I'm not saying it's right; but it alone makes more sense than 'the official story.')
I repeat also, again, for an absolutely hilarious discussion of the 'Moon Landings', please read "Wagging the Moondoggie" by the inimitable, late, great, Dave McGowan. (RIP), at [Link]
R.C.
We are SO programmed to WANT TO BELIEVE that we will look past glaringly obvious signs something was way wrong with what we were being told.
And the dozen other things. least mentioned is that they never not once successfully landed the 'bedstead', a jet powered practice version of the LEM. So, are we to believe that upon utter failure to control and land this thing on earth, they just said 'fuck it, we don't need to make this work and their very first time landing the LEM went perfect, right...Pretty much.
And good ole Gus Grissom, who they burned alive because he was a man of truth and wouldn't go along with their charade. Do you know how galactically STUPID it was to charge the atmosphere with pure Oxygen in their capsule?!!.. Its like washing yourself off with gasoline and then having a cigarette, I'm sure the occupants had NO idea of this. Any sane educated man stuffed into a capsule full of electronics charged with oxygen would object.
I believe so was Armstrong, but he played his part by just disappearing to the public. BUZZ, the old drunkard,( his love of booze most likely where his name came from) was the one who they counted upon to keep the story going. It must have made them nervous and Buzz must have constantly been reminded of his and his family's death should his tounge slip.
What kind of film was it? What kind of photographic film will function at all in the temperatures that NASA claims are normal daytime temperatures on the moon. What kind of film will function in the presence of the radiation with which the moon is constantly bombarded?
Film is an important part of making this nonsense believable.
Did you think it was just atmosphere which makes stars invisible from Earth during the day? If so, then why are they visible at night? The air doesn't go away.
stagehand,); easy, multiple passes through the Van Allen belt; size of the "astronaut" backpacks compared with the size of the hole on the "lander"; easy rejoining of the orbiting vehicle (not humanly possible)' rapid transit of close to a million miles roundtrip, etc.--it goes on and on. Big pack of lies that all the sheep fell for.
You forgot the swinging bag attached to the alleged lunar lander, that someone stopped swinging. NASA have a lot to understand about gravity.
'Question everything' is a good rule, but taking sides on big questions doesn't provide answers to them.
Most of our 'knowledge' is actually just belief anyway. Our entire lifetimes are based on personal working sets of probabilites. Scary, isn't it.
Would we really be able to see the 50km wide Aristarchus crater if the Moon was 380,000 km away
If you wish to have a thoroughly entertaining look at the Moon Landings, read Wagging the Moondoggie by the late, great, Dave McGowan at: [Link] You will laugh your ass off!
R.C.
R.Cc.
Could it have been that some NASA fools actually thought that it was possible, fired up Kennedy's imagination at a time when national pride needed a boost, and then couldn't backpedal on the deal when they realized they were biting off much more than they could chew? If so, when the whole thing devolved into a theatrical event, everyone was forced to play along with it because they were all dependent on military funding and had taken oaths of secrecy on threat of death or imprisonment.
They paid their taxes, and in return got what? Nothing.
BTW, as I heard, NASA sold the original footage to an intern, so ... nothing to worry.
[Link]
it's not all used to create the fake ...almost the opposite, it is faked to get the $$$$
One need only look at the 'press conference' held following the 'successful' return of the three 'astronauts' (Collins, Aldrin and Armstrong) to realize that something is seriously amiss. Everything about it (this news/marketing report and recollection) is insincere.
But not to worry. The selling and marketing of deceit has continued on to this very day, without a hitch, without so much as a hiccup. It alone has made many people very rich. (And others very poor and destitute......)
This is because of all the rules and regulations.
Everyone in the military and in the commercial field, where centralized control is king, knows that following rules and regulations and forcing others to follow them (no exceptions) will keep you honest.
So please everybody, do whatever your bosses tell you and observe all regulations and you will be kept safe from the fires of hell, because you followed orders.
And if you are kept safe from the fires of hell, because of this basic 'honesty' and 'integrity', so too will your bosses be kept safe....
Everything on earth now depends on this, so don't forget!
Obey your orders.
ned,
out
FUCKING FUCKING FUCKING FUCKING FUCKING FUCKING DUH.
An 'ode' to the capos (kapos).
All you fucking wealth, beauty and health snatching members of organized crime (whatever your rank).
No exceptions to the rule.
Safe from the fires of hell.
For all eternity!
ned,
OUT
These guys weren't actors, and neither were they used to telling bald-face lies while millions of people watched. Being trained in science, they knew that there would be a lot of people who would recognize the lies and judge them harshly because of it. It wasn't their fault, and there was nothing they could do that wouldn't sacrifice their own lives or potentially of everyone they loved, but that doesn't change the feelings of shame, anger, and despair that you see on the faces of those young men in the post-Apollo 11 press conference.This wasn't what they signed up for, and it had to have been a devastatingly bitter pill to swallow. That's why they responded with anger and aggression all those years later when confronted by investigative journalists. Even decades later, the idea that their lies would be made public is too much for them to bear.
I wouldn't dismiss the possibility 100%
Interesting: [Link]
I have no idea where you get the idea that whether a trip to the moon or not happened, dictates the shape of the Earth ... have you been listening to much MSM?
It's where discernment and study meet. Solving it isn't for the weak. First of all, you have to have the courage to question the Official Story. You have to be curious and brave to turn against the popular tide.
Then you have to not be crazy. ("Crazy" being an umbrella term for not having yourself together in any number of ways.) Anybody can be a wild man in a hut, but that won't get you anywhere. You need to not have bits of shit in your beard and you need to be able to move among the public without drawing looks.
Once you have courage and controlled folly down, you then you need to actually come to the correct answer.
If you want to come to the correct answer, you need to put in the time and effort, especially on the Moon Landing topic, and that provides the final separating layer; people are naturally lazy and ignorant and illogical. Ignorance, indulging in ego and tribal thinking, all of that, will leave you forever mired in the swamp.
If you can solve the "Fake Moon Landing" claim and come out with the correct answer, then you're getting ready to graduate.
Think of the pressure differential between 14.7psi inside the capsule and the near perfect vacuum of space outside, measured in Tor, it looks like this:-
760 Tor is equal to 1 atmosphere or 14.7psi
The near vacuum of space is 1×10−6 to < 1×10−17 Tor.
Show me a workable, reusable seal that can handle that pressure differential? And we claim to have done this in 1969?
I am amazed people still believe we went to the moon in 1969.
Answer me this, does our moon rotate or spin? We see a small degree of rotation depending on where you view from but the good old 'dark side' of the moon suggests we only see one side. Now look where the 2 landing sites were and try to explain why the earth wasn't directly overhead on the famous Earthrise image?
~Random guy on Quora who performed his due diligence.
More here: [Link]
You've proclaimed a conjecture statement about mathematics, called me a geek and closed the door on your way out.
ok.
I'll leave you with this: Identifying an engineering problem is nothing special. Going to the Moon was nothing but a long series of Never Been Done Before engineering challenges of the highest degree.
But rather than declare, "It's Hard, therefore Impossible!" why not research first to find out if a team of people smarter than you with a lot of time and money and drive solved those problems -before putting a stamp of disapproval on the project?
So I'm missing your point here.
So this is how I've come to understand space suit technologies:
With the first and only test ever conducted in a vacuum the subject Jim LeBlanc [Link] fell unconscious in seconds after what is gazetted as equipment failure. The equipment failed to withstand the external absence of pressure and the test was never conducted ever again, Why? NASA does not share that information but it appears to be an extremely dangerous exercise to conduct in a test facility let alone subjecting a suit to outer space [well, lets be frank; 80 miles up is not outer space and neither is this zone in the absolute vacuum of space, but I digress]. So lets look at the details critically. Firstly, the actual conditions of space extend well beyond what mankind can reproduce here on the ground (I couldn't be bothered finding the actual lowest figures offered by the facility) and with all it's concrete and technology it cannot reproduce the absolute vacuum of space. Sorry to rain on your parade Good Optics but your vacuum ovens simply don't cut it and therefore the seals and gauges used aren't subject to NASA's stringent requirements. Despite the fallibility of the test facility the o'rings and/or seals in the test blew anyway causing the hose connector failure. Second, in the case where the o'rings can withstand the forces pulling on them in situ demands that the metal impregnated fabrics expand to their limit causing the suits to become rigid and therefore untenable as as device to offer free movement for the physical demands of a space walk. But Astronauts have been kicking around in suits for years. This is proven fact with the space walk by Ed White in 1965 [Link]!!! Well... No, the footage of Ed White is stop motion animation and is proven fake at the moment when Ed turns his helmet at 1:45. The fact is that all NASA astronaut helmets are fixed to a hard upper torso (HUT) section which allows the neck and head the freedom to move inside the helmet while also allowing for a bulky communications headset.
In summary, the failure of the test suit in 1966 that has never been conducted since while being a year after the fake Ed White space walk that was understood world wide as absolutely real until only recently coupled with the complete lack of ballooning and rigidity in the fabric sections (arms/legs) does pose a problem of authenticity for NASA. As for the maths I think it must be up there with Einsteins mathematical hyjinx in order to pardon the inexplicable reality of space suit technologies.
You're saying the pressure differential cannot be greater that 1 atmosphere. I think you're only considering one side of the seal's job lol.
Think about it for a second.....
Your Pdiff is seen across the seal, and, having designed, built and worked with high temp cryo systems (LN2), and pressure systems both hydraulic and pneumatic, and roughing pump vacuum systems both at RT and 150°C, I don't need to, "Think about it for a second" because I have done. the. work. -- decades worth.
Maybe tell us about your work . . .
This explains it quite well.
I'm a manager btw.
If you're quoting space as having zero pressure you need to do some reading my friend.
- The Physics Factbook
It's obvious, this can only be resolved by a three way duel, at fifty paces, with whatever non explosive-round, lever, bolt, or semi automatic, NON-shotgun firearm each wish. (No prior conspiracy betwixt any allowed.)
One magazine, a total of thirty rounds* each, no more. Same will be held in one of Central Florida's Oak/Pine areas, and the smartest will, at fifty paces begin running to the nearest palmetto scrub. I will play second (nay, third) for one of ye; We'll need other volunteers: for infinite reasons and non reasons, the names for other 'thirds' come to mind: Brakar, HFL, cracker, gdpetti are but a few that come to mind.
The question is: what firearm would you choose? Very hot, humid, and visible range clearings are a max of 30M. As much as I hate to say it, I'd probably go for a 16" bbl. M4.
I await your answers, and, (as per the typical illogic of 'duels') he who answers last is (almost) presumed to be a coward.
R.C.
I am joking and would allow this only via paintball guns - and the results would have NOTHING to do with who's right above.
I gotta go; I need my balls waxed.
RC
*If you're smart, youl'll take a few rounds out and place into your pocket at your very first chance...
RC
A milliTorr, a microTorr, a nanoTorr, a pico- or a femtoTorr of pressure cannot represent a Pdiff of more the 1 atm.
Zero Torr = zero atm . . . . PERIOD
Turning this foolishness around backwards we get :
14.7psi - 0.000000000000000000000000000000001psi = 14.6666666666666666666666666666669psi
And no, I didn't count my decimal places; you get the picture.
They however claim ludicrous forces.
If you have an air compressor in your shop, I assume you have both and if the air reservoir (let's make it a small one) is 1ft in dia and 2ft long the total internal area is (1 x 3.14 x 2) + (2 x 3.14 x 1) = 6.28 + 3.14 = 9.42sq ft = 1,356 sq" which at 100psi is containing a total outward force of 135,648 lbs; 67.8 tons, in your shop, contained by a wall of mild steel typically 0.125in thick. A bomb in other words.
Just for fun here's a little engineering calc that'll work out your wall thickness for you [Link] In my example above the calc generates a wall thickness of a mere 0.025" which no one in their right mind would presume to use.
==================
I dunno what you manage but it sure as shit isn't an engineering team.
I done wasting time on this nonsense, learn some physics, any physics . . . .
R.C.
Here's a YouTube of a guy who is lucky to be alive and who knows what hearing damage he suffered [Link]
There's a very good reason why real air receivers in industrial situations are tracked by the Gov't Pressure Testing people. 99% of them are made from unlined mild steel and over the decades they rust thru from the inside out and past a certain age are disqualified from further service.
In closing on this thread, any vehicle in space that houses people in normal clothing is a pressure vessel that must withstand 1atm maximum. For that reason, all doors open into the vehicle; that way the door seals experience the pressure exerted on the entire surface area of a given air lock. Given the ratio of door area to seal area it's easily seen that the seals experience great pressures.
So, I am quite impressed with your math and calculations and i would concede on the face of it you have more direct specialized knowledge on this subject, all be it based on being grounded here on earth, like us all....
So assuming your math is correct, for a mesely compressor to be at 100psi with 0.125" wall thickness, bearing in mind its not expierencing vacuum conditions on one side. There is a force of 67.8T exerted or contained by the walls of the compressor. And assuming we have seals that can deal with that kind of PD without being troubled by moon dust. Would these same conditions and forces generated (conversely) on a spacesuit not leave it completely inflated, rigid and useless for any kind of dextrous task?
Bearing mind the walls of NASAs test facility that can't get near the vacuum of space are 8ft thick concrete and steel lined.
[Link]
OK, that's done and I just hit my meds so:
Please don't be 'impressed' by my 'math', it was nothing more than arithmetic on the basis of pi x r^2 for the area of a circle, pi x D for its circumference and pi x D x L for the outside area of a cylinder and a couple of multiplications and divisions.
Now the are those who insist that 'pie are round ' and ' cake are square' but never mind, maybe they think the Earth is flat as well.
So back to this high vacuum business: first let's settle on just one unit rather than the hodge podge of Torr, Pascal, PSI, atm, bar, mm of Hg and on and on.
It's 'psi' and, ditching rigour in favour of further simplification, atmospheric pressure is 15.0000000.... psi, with '...' at the end meaning the zeros continue indefinitely.
Following on: 0.0000000...psi equals no (atmospheric) pressure at all, none whatsoever and, let's observe that in space we believe the atoms and molecules of gas within a cubic centimetre is some fairly small number and Googling we find this [Link] and if we remember that a cubic meter contains 1,000,000 cubic centimetres (cc) we see we can expect to find about a million atoms in a cubic meter. Now if we seal them all up in a one cubic meter box we ain't got much going on that'll make much gas pressure, and it's effin' cold out there so nothing is much whizzing around and beating on the walls of our can either.
So lets call the pressure in that box full of not much at all a zero pressure.
Now I think your argument is that in deep space tremendous forces are exerted on the outside of any sealed vessel by the vacuum of space, and that spacecraft must be built to withstand those forces otherwise they'll be crushed like the pumped out tank car.
The thing is however: there ain't no such forces acting on no vessels in deep space because there ain't no stinkin' atoms to speak of making any forces.
Going back then to something I said earlier: a pressurized space capsule is a pressure vessel containing total forces arising from whatever pressure is within the space craft.
And that's it . . . No crunched space capsules
.. and as per Plane Will says, nothing is getting crushed, the vacuum is on the outside of the capsules / suits, so the problem is expansion / explosion
Guns for show, knives for a pro lol
Not in space though.
The only affect they experienced was a slight loss of air?
In actuality, a compressed air vessel of substandard build wont blow up like a bomb, it will just split at the weakest point and dump its air. And its usually very small and un-dramatic looking.
All that's needed is a willingness to think independently instead of being told what to think. Simple, really.
NRN.
R.C.
Oh, wait - America can get into space. Put the astronauts into Teslas and let them commute to work at the ISS.
P.s., AGAIN, I say, if anyone has never read 'Wagging the Moondoggie' by Dave McGowan (RIP) at 'Center for an Informed America' (get it?), then the time is NOW! [Link]
RC
Their theory of uniformitarianism claims "erosion is the wearing away of the land by water, ice or wind"
Zero G flights don't prove anything
This is the end of the 'dumbing down process'.... and we can see the fruits of their labor.... just because we can't seem to do anything today, we assume everyone before us was even dumber.... is that only in America these days?
1) WHO are the people " in charge of debunking challenges "? Are you speaking of professional 'debunkers'; most likely often PTB/CIA paid--off to mislead the masses, be it about UFOs, 9/11/2001, OKC, whatever.
Or are you referencing certain SOTTites who, in your opinion, should have, but did not, post an opinion? If so, who?
A debunker, to earn their salt, should at least attempt to say something substantial - though I grant you many of those sort might get away with a huge amount of substantial (and wrong) disinformation; they could hardly write the whole books on it that they do.
So I am at a loss. Who are you referring to and why are they not speaking/writing 'substantially/substantively'?
Thanks.
R.C.
Thanks.
R.C.
R.C.
No civilians can ever be allowed to travel outside of low Earth orbit as they would soon be asking why space is so utterly black. If any further manned missions to the Moon are ever performed it will be the military who go, same for Mars, as they can be told to keep quiet. Neil Armstrong told us how black it was out there on the BBC interview with Patrick Moore, so from then on he was kept on a very short leash and any interviews he gave were under the close scrutiny of his handlers, and no doubt he was under threat of his own or his families safety if he crossed the line.
After 50 years there are still no actual photographs of the stars or the Sun taken from cislunar space but it seems the public has been dumbed down to a point where nobody even notices, we live in an Idiocracy for sure.
[Link] I almost killed myself on the Moon – Apollo 16 astronaut
Just a few of us have had the privilege of seeing Earth from above, and from the Moon, they say, it’s so small that you can hide it behind your finger. On the 50th anniversary of the Apollo 11 Moon landing, we talk to legendary moonwalker and astronaut Charlie Duke.
No doubt some will say he is/was a paid shill, for NASA, but you know something, it was an era in the US where the fields of science and technology really was respected for it's achievements around the world.
Now look at it (to go where mo man had gone before, to travel to the moon and back) is considered nothing more than a conspiracy theory.
A people that have lost any idea of creativity, to cross the threshold of what was/is know and explore the boundaries of reality.
Well it's so much easier to control a people that are numbed by a world of fantasy that is created for them.
The Sun was visible from the Moon, not the stars. The Russians measured the brightness of the daytime sky in both the visible and the UV and found it surprisingly bright, which is why he described the sky as a shiny black. The brightness of the sky is from Solar UV radiation causing the fine lunar dust in the atmosphere to emit visible light, an effect well documented by lab experiments. This same effect is what makes the Sun visible, but it is much brighter as the forward scattered light forms a beam which is strongest at the centre. This is a fluorescent process though, and there is very little heat generated. So maybe the stars are not visible because they are washed out by the shiny lunar sky? Fair enough.
During the Lunar night there can be no such excuse, and although there have been no humans there during the night, there have been landers and rovers that have, but none have photographed the stars. "Oh, the cameras don't operate at night, it's too cold." How convenient. Perhaps NASA will figure out eventually how to solve that surely daunting technical hurdle.
So without specific tests performed from deep space we are no closer to knowing if the stars can be seen or not. I just photographed the stars last night with a digital camera I got for $1 at the charity shop, surely NASA can afford something a little better?
"Neil Armstrong described the appearance of the lunar surface as seen from within the LM cabin as follows:
It's a peculiar thing, but the surface looked very warm and inviting. It looked as if it would be a nice place to take a sunbath • • • From the cockpit the surface seemed to be tan. It's hard to account for that, because later when I held this material in my hand, it wasn't tan at all. It was black, grey and so on.
Seen from within the comparatively dim cabin, the intensely illuminated surface appeared almost white, but when compared with the truly white Beta cloth covering of the space suit it was perceived as being very dark. The complex dependence of visual perception upon many variables was a major cause of uncertainty in lunar visibility predictions."
R.C.
The rabbit hole goes far deeper, if like Columbo you keep questioning. They could not have gone to the Moon without the rocketry science they got from the Germans after the war, but also the tech for the navigation computer. That technology was acquired by Hitler from the Vatican , but it was only the engineering and materials advances made by the USA that allowed them to construct the device. There were photos of the stars from Lunar orbit, but they were taken with the camera attached to the Sextant, and the sextant included the Star Tracker, which detected the stars in the UV (Lyman Alpha spectral line) and converted it to visible light so photos could be taken. [Link]
The Enduring Mystery of Light
It goes through walls, but slows to a standstill in ultra-cold gases. It carries electronic information for radios and TVs, but destroys genetic information in cells. It bends around buildings and....
Here is a article that talks about the realities of the time .[Link] 60's is the decade of extraordinary murders of JFK, MLK, RFK etc. which most average people might have doubted, but establishment successfully controlled it with Media and its propaganda. It looks NASA did it to get the funding to be continued.
Obviously, competitor Russian would be looking at it carefully. What do they say? Son of Soviet premier Khrushchev says: [Link] Well, one can say it is small telescope or haven't looked at the right place etc., but No body tried since then is a very big flag. Even to this day, many try to climb mount Everest despite the risk of death.
Well, I remember the launch, as all of the Apollos made all other launches seem like a bottle rocket; including all the shuttle launches. (This is particularly so since the thrust from the shuttle's main engines came from mixing liquid oxygen (LOX) & Liquid Hydrogen. (LH2). Now I could be wrong, but as I recall, the only residuals of the combustion of LH2 and LOX is.STEAM/H2O! Thus, it was a highly efficient process and wasted far less energy in the form of light.
Thus, I was surprised by the contrast when I first saw a night launch of a shuttle... UNDERimpressed, to be sure. This was especially so as compared with the ONLY nighttime launch of an Apollo: A-17 which looked like a high speed rising of the sun! The sky over Orlando was blue, just like at 11 a on a clear Summer morning, likewise, we lost our shadows due to the diffraction of the light off all of the air molecules.
I remember the moon landing - with Walter Cronkite, on TV - very well. (Official story.) My father woke me up, and kept me awake, with one? of my siblings. I kept falling back asleep; oh well. (I was 10 years old.) Maybe my old soul was bored with wishing to say: "What a bunch of propaganda!"
R.C.
"Thats one step for a man... one giant "zzt' fake for mankind "zzzt".
R.C.
e .g. "Evil you have landed"
So I dug a little and on what must. be. a rock solid page on Wikipedia come up with, "Third Party Evidence for Apollo Moon Landings" at this [Link] .
Now as Fate would have it UPS just today dropped off my brand new carbon nanotube, bulletproof, flame resistant, hazmat flak suit so I'm all set for the withering blasts . . .
BTW, here on YouTube are the guys who make CNT material by the literal acre, no small feat [Link] and here's a follow-on [Link]
Here I was sort of expecting some properly righteous outrage and what do we see but diddly . . . I wanna check out my spanky new suit
If going to the Moon was a fake, then all this must be a fake too?
[Link]
I don't think I could live there, not even for 6 months.
Also those plane noises (Zero G flight) in the background 24/7 would be a problem
I am fairly shaggy myself and drop hair all over the place ... luckily I don't live in "space" and my life doesn't depend on my hair not getting into switches etc.
That would never happen living on a flat earth.
That could have taken down the whole program, a mass infestation of nits, all brought on by females with massive hair
Let the wit;
Go on and Git-
Eee-Yup!
And let the wit begin!
R.C.
R.C.
I drank the kool-aid for a long time because I WANTED to believe it...When i as a kid I built from scratch and kits all sorts of Apollo stuff. It sorta makes you mad though. What psycho assholes in this world... Why does it have to be this way?.. All the lies, pain, and bullcrap.
All I can figure, a great evil came here a long time ago and nothing has been the same since.
The whole Lunar Rover fantasy appears to have been conjured by PR folks who'd spent way too much of their youths watching George Jetson cartoons. They really should have been consulting with the people who had their feet on the ground, physics-wise, but those guys were likely hiding out in embarrassment or drinking excessively by the time Apollo 15 came around. They needn't have worried, though. Just as with 9/11, when Americans are told that it's unpatriotic to question something, most take their patriotic duty quite seriously.
They claim that the ISS does not melt in the thermosphere as there aren't enough molecules to transfer heat
S o if stranded in space, how does one suddenly freeze when there are not enough molecules to transfer the heat away from the body
R.C
I can't even begin to imagine how spacesuits are meant to work! ... the only "real life" experience we have is of weather balloons/ high altitude tests. Those things get to about 100,000 feet and finally explode, having expanded so much due to the lower external pressure
One thing I am certain about it that none of the NASA upper echelon would ever be prepared to personally test a space suit in a vacuum chamber
Which once again brings to mind the fantastiic short story by Ambrose Bierce, who was a Colonel? (I believe) for the Union during the War of Northern Aggression. He became a great writer and "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge' is considered one of his best. (Its about an attempted hanging of a Southern Planter for attempted sabotage at said bridge.)
It begins: It's relevant to all this. Check t out; [Link] it's a quick story.
R.C.
I am half way through wagging the moondoggie. A brilliant read, thank you for the link.
For eye opening series and books, his other works are likewise fantastic: such as Laurel Canyon (CIA Cooption of 60s Peace Movement); his photographical analysis of the alleged Boston Bombing; his books on MK Ultra and Manchurian Candidates, et alia.
IF the CIA/PTB have some high speed cancer they use, (c.f., Jack Ruby(Jacob Leon Rubenstein); Hugo Chavez, et al.), I believe it more likely than not that Dave just woke too many people up so he got it too.*
R.C.
*I know he smoked.
RC
Maybe the real reason why we have never gone "back" is that they learnt to carry out brutal FF events instead ... far cheaper and far more "spontaneous"
How are these images captured, most images from satellites, do no capture the full image of other planets within our solar system, even when they are on asteroids, or satellites surrounding other planets in our solar system.
Now a camera pointing toward Earth (where on earth would it point to, unless it had quantum capabilities) we are only shown the light side of the moon
But the Moon is our closest companion, and the images from the moon, have given the closest representation of what we are as a world orbiting thorough a minuscule dot on the arm of the Milky Way in which we inhabit.
Is is truth, is it a reality, who knows, but at the time of the moon landing, color photography was an accepted fact.
And how else would we be able to see the image of the Big Blue Marble in a backdrop of dark matter without landing on the Moon.
Just my thoughts.
The BBC do a particularly nasty version with their weather forecast - [Link] - Why do we need this constant programming?
I just noticed that they have all the country borders showing - e.g. between England / Scotland and England / Wales ... these do not physically exist.
So what's the point of this discussion? What difference could it possibly make to me?
The government (except those pesky axis of evil nations way back when) is a corporation owned by a private investor, full stop. We the people have to come to this realisation en mass and look past the facade of government to focus on the owners of these corporations and their values. What difference it could possibly make is all about your soul, its the very bottom line, why? Because it is the Vatican See that owns all of the nations around the world. Have you noticed how the Church is bringing together all religions these days? Soon my friend, we will all be under the spell of one world religion, a theocracy and seeing as the church already maintains fiscal dominion over everything it would be no great stride to have dominion over the souls of the entire world population; and this is exactly where the flat earth conversation comes in. If outer space has indeed been faked with the aid of NASA's shadow behind every international space agency, every cosmologically related society, every university and every book on the subject/s then you must ask - why are they doing this? what are they hiding? Remember, they are those whose values are imposed through the facade of government. If we are indeed under some sort of cupola , you know, those dome shaped things that are so prevalent on the tops of churches and buildings of social import all around the world, then that possibility alone points to one thing and one thing only; that we are stuck in a vivarium and something made it for us to live here. This reality asks people to question what we're doing here, why, and the scary thing... how to get out. If the Roman Catholic Church knows this cupola as the truth and is hiding and actively withdrawing this information away from the western world (The majority of Chinese people always believed they live under a dome which explains why China must go to the moon even while their astronauts discharge tiny air bubbles into the ocean of space) then it becomes self explanatory that these are the questions the Roman Catholic Church cannot allow to be broached by the greater population for the vicars and pope stand in substitute to god and they will not give up that position easily. Just touching on these few subjects in this larger conversation already demonstrates vividly that we must indeed be living in the end times as proclaimed within the bible and this is how it makes every difference to you personally for indeed we will all soon be fighting for our very souls. Here's the kicker, can you even comprehend whose side you are on let alone how to be on the side you would prefer to be on?
Maybe the people to ask are the owners of You Tube and Paypal
Jernamism has now been classified as a deplorable for his views on NASA and the heliocentric model - Paypal has terminated all services for his account - [Link]
I ndeed, what difference could it possibly make to Paypal is someone does not believe we went to the Moon, or what if they do not believe in Darwin's evolution, or if they believe the Earth model as historically depicted by virtually all religions?
It seems to make a difference to someone - maybe Paypal are just under orders, that sort of shit happens when companies are financially seeded by the alphabet agencies
I thought I first saw it under Science and Technology.
wrongincorrect. Not happyBecause they need to believe it to preserve their worldview...?..
Like that 'scientist' who said even if the astro-nots admitted it was a hoax, he would still believe it happened as told.
I was all about Apollo when I was a kid, and even later in life until one day it was so obvious it was fake. The rocket was real. They went into orbit and hung out for a few days while the movie set did their thing. Although I'm sure they had their flick done way before the actual 'mission'
And that near retard astro-not Dan Pettite's word's; We cant go to the moon because we lost the technology'
Oops.
What would have happened to the USA if RUSSIA got there first, or we crashed on the moon... or any number of disasters happened?.. The country would be crushed and demoralized. They could NOT afford this to happen. Period.. It HAD to be a success and the only way to be sure it was, was to fake it.
The landing stuff to me is fake, but anyone is welcome to believe whatever they like. When your ready for truth and to stop eating out of NASA's hand, go check out all the evidence.
But as to the landing/trip to moon... see dave McGowan.
R.C.
R.C.
Yeah, that's right. The rockets and shuttles n shizzz, they all do that "go with roll programme" thing where they eventually go sideways at 50 or 60 mile up, downrange over the Bermuda triangle while the altitude stats on the screen are flying through the figures ever quicker by the minute when they should obviously be slowing down due to the roll. The guy's n gal's n LGBTQ's+ at SpaceX (gotta be inclusive) go to the CGI video feed way early to spoon feed what should be going on but won't let us watch the vee-hickle become a sideways moving speck "live". Going sideways doesn't mean that they are skimming around the globe to do that slingshot thing, it only means that the vee-hickle is out of sight and out of mind. Seriously tho' I don't know how any person with good sense cannot entertain the idea that they might be deceived by this dramatization.
This part of the video has some kids' responses to the
big fireworkrocket launches"That's bad .. .it looks bad to me" / "Oh no, it's going down"
The adult is the background is trying to say "The rocket isn't turning, the Earth is spinning"
Why do the women on the ISS are allowed to have long hair?...That poofs up all over and 'floats" around and could possible get caught on switches etc.
Ponder that one. So everyone is in jeopardy because they are liberal and you can have your hair however you choose?...
Because its just another movie set is my belief.
Beautiful.
DITRH - 13 biggest SCIENCE LIES YOU've Been Told - [Link] ... 5 minutes of awesome
Seems that no amateurs can assembly a balloon that doesn't burst once the pressure gets too low ... surely they should be able to stitch together some Playtex bras and panties in the same way that they did for the original NASA spacesuits
This is what NASA says - [Link] Given the lower air density are higher altitude, it follows that the mass of displaced air also becomes lower with altitude
I challenge you not to laugh out loud .. the sound guy went way over the top!
So to get into orbit you go vertical actually not very far, just so the atmosphere is almost gone @90k-120k feet. Then turn the vehicle almost horizontal to get your delta V up to orbital speed.
Just sayin
[Link]
IIRC The shuttle pitches slightly nose DOWN relative to the horizon at one point high up in the arc, to lose any vertical velocity and trade that for forward orbital speed. At the point it does this, there is essentially no atmosphere so it really does not matter what direction the shuttle itself is pointed, only where the engines and thrust vector is.
Yeah, it does look strange tho if your thinking in terms of 'flying' through air, which at that point it is not but easy to think it is.
Full Cockpit Launch + Crew audio Last Space Shuttle ♦ STS-135 - [Link]
I'm struggling to believe that the film is off the astronauts sitting with their backs to the ground in normal gravity
I also thought it pretty odd that once they lift off, and get into "space", they take off their gloves and helmets
I'm sorry to be such a pain Illusionoffreedom, it took me over a year to break through my cognitive dissonance and what we are dealing with here is the biggest illusion that has ever been perpetrated on mankind. When I saw that whichever vehicle (you name it) was not positioned to go higher than really low Earth orbit (aka barely cracking 80 miles up) - even the massive Apollo rockets, that over and over and over again, with each successive launch, kept levelling out in the visual feed I finally called fowl. You might not be able to see it now but once you do you can't un-see it. They are faking sending rockets into "outer space" and only launch them as high as low Earth orbit which is officially 80 miles up.
I'm uncertain about your questions, although reading the comments and watching his previous content he appears to have great success in recovering his equipment from 70 plus miles away, hence this great footage.. Best in mind. If coroilis were in effect it would have landed hundreds of miles relative to take off, but I digress...
Re permits, they allowed a crazy rocketman to do his thing eventually to much MSM glee, this sort of ,personal, objective inquisitive experiment would probably be pulled off without any official sanction I would guess.
it's still beautiful to see our earth from that elevation with the plasma field of gases ignited by our local sun.
Any idea why this does not exist is historical images
it's just another small detail in a sea of others that become plainly obvious when viewed through the right lens. When you know NASA lies, you take none of their shit at face value.
The colours reminded me of this. [Link] skip to 1.05
as far as never seeing a single star in any Apollo near moon photos, not having successfully ever landed the 'bedstead' LEM simulator here on earth, Pumping apollo 8 or whatever's atmo with pure oxygen and then have a 'shott circuit" on one of the most meticulously constructed vehicles of ALL time (supposedly)and burning up one of Nasa's biggest critics and 2 other dudes with him.
Then surviving the radiation like it was not even there (or they were not even there more accurately)
Having the crew come home and be interviewed looking somber, scared, and even embarrased.
The 'first man to set foot on the moon' virtually disappears from the public eye. His buddy BUZZ stays drunk for 50 years and rides the fortune.
NASA accidently erased all the data because they wanted to re-use some magnetic tapes...This agency gets millions of dollars a day to operate. I still have VHS tapes of my sisters wedding and these dudes oops all the actual concrete evidence.
THEN, some NEW TAPES show up, because some intern had the incredible foresight ( and financial resources) to purchase them for $200 in 1970's money...
It just goes on and on and on.