OF THE
TIMES
I put nothing out of the realm of what the rogue state of Israel will do - and that place needs to be checked into a mental institution - and then...
We've also been warned that the closure of the Strait of Hormuz could lead to world famine. I guess those of us who can should stock up to be able...
Ahhh, the Times, a rubbish newspaper.
When it comes to getting exposed "unwillingly" I suspect this is what the downfall will be of the pompous ones. If one goes through history - this...
Of course they are hiding their Oct 7the false flag data! The same way the US government is hiding their 9/11 false flag data! I mean, everyone...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE

OK scientists. I see a contradiction in your work here.
You say:
"In the boys who had higher levels of fetal testosterone, the brain's reward system was more responsive to positive, compared with negative, facial cues, the researchers found. "
Sounds good, testosterone is the male sex hormone, which appears to then suggest males of that nature are more responsive to positive reinforcement rather than negative. So how does that then link with psychopathy and then impulsiveness? How do you get something that makes you LESS prone to negative feedback make you MORE prone to psychopathy and impulsiveness? Just seems contradictory to me. I see negativity as more psychopathic and impulsiveness than positivity.
I think you are trying to back up your feminist power appeal with scientific ideology. This is just another study which seek to demonize the male gender. Like the one about the "selfish gene" or the extinction of the Y chromosome.
They might as well say men are stupid because they have penises or a Y chromosome. Penises and testosterone both are intrinsic to males.
Scientists are still trying to prove there is no soul and everything mental is based on brain chemistry, so they team up with feminism the new religion to establish their chemical soup theory.
Western Science... when are you gonna cure cancer?