And this:
However debatable such an approach may be, there is no denial that geopolitical potential is quantifiable and here is an interesting piece of analysis by former Indian diplomat M. K. Bhadrakumar, who in his piece US-Russia-China triangle in flux, again comes to some interesting conclusions and provides some valuable insights. He starts with giving a trivial and unimaginative Kissinger "triangulation" of 1970s some treatment, not forgetting to mention earlier Eisenhower's triangulation of 1950s:
Kissinger argued that the United States, which sought to profit from the enmity between Moscow and Beijing in the Cold War era, would therefore need "to play this balance-of-power game totally unemotionally. Right now, we need the Chinese to correct the Russians and to discipline the Russians." But in the future, it would be the other way around....Now, this recapitulation is useful today, because Trump's moves so far are indicative of an agenda to revert to the Eisenhower era - containment of China by forging an alliance with Russia.
Comment: The US wants to contain China but that's not likely to happen. Russia has a lot more to gain than to fear from China and the US has consistently demonstrated itself to be an unreliable partner. See also: There will not be an American-Russian alliance against China