With so much debate going on over what really happened at the Pentagon on 9/11, and the obvious dire lack of coherent commentators to put and end to it once and for all, I decided that it was high time that I added my own reality-based voice to the debate and, in doing so, allow common sense to finally prevail over the ranting of wild-eyed, hairy-knuckled, missing link type conspiracy theorists and liberals alike.
Regardless, then, of the reams and reams of electronic paper that have been wasted on the inane back and forth over what did or did not happen, the task of showing just what hit the Pentagon could not be easier, which makes it difficult to understand why the debate has lasted so long. If I didn't know better, I might almost think that there was some kind of conspiracy going on. Of course, I DO know better. Conspiracies simply do not exist - except for the small ones, they exist, but the big, scary ones do not, and never have. Everyone knows that.
Anyway, to get to the point. I will present conclusive proof that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon by way of 10 carefully selected photos that, while they speak for themselves, will be accompanied by some incisive commentary by yours truly.
Let's get started:
Just so we know where we are going, above is a nice picture of a 757-200 with the stats of the aircraft included. These stats are the same as those of Flight 77, which was also a 757-200, and which hit the Pentagon. Therefore it is logical to conclude that Flight 77 did indeed hit the Pentagon.
Above is an image of the actual Flight 77, a Boeing 757-200, that hit the Pentagon. This picture was taken before it hit the Pentagon. As you all can see, the plane is real. This plane was painted in the AA colors. It also has two 757-200 engines under each wing. An aircraft engine was found in the wreckage at the Pentagon. Coincidence? This is the plane that flew from Dulles International airport and crashed into the Pentagon, therefore, it follows that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.
Here is a photo of some wreckage at the Pentagon crash site where Flight 77 hit. Aircraft debris is visible to the left, to the right, at the top and also the bottom. If you are still in any doubt about the fact that this is the wreckage of Flight 77, notice the green aircraft primer (it's in the pile somewhere) - proof conclusive that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.
In the above photo we see yet more evidence that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. Notice the firemen. They are very small compared to the large Pentagon. Now, imagine that just a few minutes before, a large passenger aircraft flew into this building. Close your eyes and imagine. Can you see it? I know you can. Stay with me on this.
Look at the firemen again. They are American patriots. They were down there on the Pentagon lawn on that fateful September morn, when terror, in the shape of a Boeing 757, with a wild-eyed Muslim terrorist at the controls, swooped out of the clear blue American sky to strike at the heart of everything we hold dear. They are the guys who stood there on that lawn and said: "nothing's gonna hurt you tonight, not on my watch." Those guys know what hit the Pentagon. The question is: do you?
Other than giving us an idea of what it is to be a true American, the above photo allows us to see the relative size of the Pentagon (relative to a fireman) and the area that was damaged by Flight 77. Firemen are always called out to air crashes. Obviously then, Flight 77 did this damage to the Pentagon.
Notice the facade is missing a large chunk. Obviously, this is where a part of Flight 77 hit. The smoke and fire is evidence that a large passenger aircraft hit the building about 25 minutes before this photo was taken. Notice the police car in the foreground for further reference. Police men are just ordinary guys. They know what a passenger plane looks like.
All of this provides us with more evidence that it was indeed Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon. After all, what else could it have been.
In the above image, we (you and me), see more debris from Flight 77 found inside the Pentagon; don't we. I have marked a piece of metal with a red arrow to not only highlight the fact that this piece of metal came from Flight 77 but also so that you, the reader, understand that I am a competent researcher. Note how charred all of this debris is. Obviously charring of this nature results from the impact of a large passenger jet into a large stationary building. If you are still unconvinced, notice that the piece of metal, while badly burned, is obviously green, and therefore came from Flight 77. Notice also that the piece of metal has "rivet holes". Boeing 757-200s have rivet holes. Further evidence that this is a part of Flight 77.
One of my personal favorites. The above image is damning to the claims of all 9/11 conspiracy crackpots. Very clearly, we can identify a piece of aluminum hanging from the ceiling of the interior of the Pentagon. Flight 77 was made of aluminum. Conclusion? Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.
The 'piece de resistance'. Bold as life, what you are witnessing in the above image, with your very own eyes, is part of the Rolls Royce engine of Flight 77. You see that circular shape with the small holes in it? That is part of a Rolls Royce 757 engine. If you don't believe me, compare with the photo below.
See? Enough said
In the above image, we again see clear evidence of the remains of Flight 77, where the fragile nose cone punched through ring C of the Pentagon. Stop for a moment and picture the nose cone (or the engine or something) of Flight 77 coming crashing out of this hole on that horrible, terrible, awful day when the Islamic terrorists attacked us. Can you see it? I know you can.
Now note the green color on some of the debris. This is a clear sign of its origin - Flight 77. Notice also that this hole is round. The fuselage of a Boeing 757-200 is also round. Flight 77 is about 13ft tall. This hole is also about 13ft tall. What does that tell us? Obviously, it tell us that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.
And finally. Notice the round thing in the above photo. I have placed a yellow arrow above it in case you can't see it. Flight 77 was made up of many round things, including the tyres. This piece of debris looks like it might be half a tyre. If it is, (and it certainly seems that way) then it shows that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.
For those who need a little extra something to 'seal the deal' as it were, and to forever put to rest the kooky conspiracy theories that have plagued our great nation since 9/11: look at the man in the above photo. He is an American rescue worker -
a hero and patriot. Notice that his head is bowed as he walks away. Clearly, he is very sad. But
why is he very sad?
He is very sad because Flight 77 had just hit the Pentagon, and also because he knows that many people will refuse to believe the official story.
Aren't
you sad that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon? Do YOU want to be one of those people that make American patriots and heroes sad because of your beliefs? I didn't think so.
Let's review the facts:The U.S. government says that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.
There are pictures of the Pentagon that show clearly that something hit it.
There was a big explosion.
The U.S. government says that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon
There are pictures of debris that show that whatever hit the Pentagon was quite big and had a lot of force.
A 757 is quite big and has a lot of force.
The U.S. government says that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon
Flight 77 and its passengers are missing
The U.S. government says that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon
Eyewitnesses said they saw a plane hitting the Pentagon
The attack on the Pentagon placed guilt for the 9/11 attacks firmly at the door of the Islamic terrorists. The US government has made it clear that Islamic terrorists carried out the 9/11 attacks. Bin Laden says he carried out the 9/11 attacks.
The U.S. government says that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon
Conclusion:Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.
Reader Comments
The 737-200 is smaller than a 757. The engines on the 737-200 are different than other 737s. They are longer and thinner. The 737-200 was specifically chosen for the mission as the engines gave extra ground clearance for the run into the Pentagon.
An unloaded (less wing loading) 737 is capable of the maneuvers that the a/c made that day.
Joe, you can sell your soul and earn a sh*tload of money writing for them. Or so I guess ...
What is missing from the parody? The flight path of Flight 77 as the "terrorists" flew a tortuous path with great skill to hit the pentagon. Everyone knows that Cesna pilot training is perfect for maneuvering a 77 and getting a job as an airline pilot.
And of course, the fact that Rumsfeld the day before said there is a missing 2 or 3 trillion dollars, and that the accountants working on the financially tracking the money with their records happened to be located at the blast site part of the Pentagon was obviously a false conspiracy theory because no dead bodies or records were found, except maybe a janitor.
'For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.'
Thus, nothing ever really happens and nothing ever really gets done.
It is all fakery. A cancellation, of sorts. A denial. Nothing is real, or what it seems. No morality. No justice or anything like that. Why should there be?
Everything is imagined or conjured. All it takes is might.
Some 'truth-seekers' who depend on science alone, might think (maybe?) they have or that there is, a real problem, eventually.
That might cost them a lot.
Shit happens.
But, not to worry.
It is all fake!
So it is nothing. Nothing at all.
And can you guess my name?
I don't exist!
ned,
out
Some do exist.
Maybe not the 9_11 Pentagon hit being a missile, but that is a very errant claim about conspiracies in general. I feel.
What is a large conspiracy to Joe?
Also WHY could a large conspiracy never exist, and how and why should everyone know this?
Wasn't the planning of the people whom crashed the jets part of a large secret plan to crash planes in America into buildings?
i.e. a conspiracy?
Joe's statement seems very double talk since he's trying to prove a conspiracy while saying there are none.
Joe, this is not one of your greatest literary moments m8.
SMFH.
If so, who appointed him the conspiratorial qualifier in chief?
i swear I didn't see the -Parody in the header. I'm glad it IS there.
im adult enough to admit maybe I made an ass out of myself.
thanks. I was thinking wtf?
(....................................... )
Why Was Kennedy Killed, Who Benefited, and Who Had the Power to Cover it Up?
In the conclusion of the film, we are told all the things that Kennedy did that made him an arch-enemy of the CIA and the military. Kennedy, who was hated by the CIA even before the Bay of Pigs disaster, afterwards fired the CIA Director Allen Dulles and his subordinates and promised to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds after he realized that they tricked him with the Bay of Pigs.In 1961, they also killed those Kennedy greatly admired and was working with on issues of decolonialization: Patrice Lumumba of the Congo and the Secretary General of the United Nations, Dag Hammarskjöld. Less than eleven months into office, JFK was faced with a savage enemy from within that he didn’t control. He told the French ambassador that he was in no way involved in the CIA’s attempts to assassinate French President Charles de Gaulle, his ally, and that he had no control over the CIA.After JFK’s assassination, Allen Dulles told journalist Willie Morris that Kennedy “thought he was a god.” This from the man who had his henchmen kill with impunity and loved the Nazis with whom he worked and brought into the U.S. government (see David Talbot’s The Devil’s Chessboard ).
In a document uncovered by the ARRB called the Northwoods Document, the Joint Chiefs of Staff recommended to Kennedy that he approve a false flag operation to start a war with Cuba by blowing up an empty plane over Cuba and blaming it on Castro and setting off bombs in American cities killing Americans for the same purpose. Of course, Kennedy refused, only intensifying their hatred of him. Then when he wouldn’t bomb Cuba during the missile crisis in October 1962, gave his American University speech the following June, sought reconciliation with the Soviet Union, and decided to withdraw from Vietnam, the die was cast: He had to die.Who has benefited from his death?The war manufacturers first and foremost, for they have been reaping their bloody profits ever since. The war against Vietnam was just the start, for the wars and alarms of war have never stopped.And the CIA, working as the leading edge for the military around the world, continuing the Pax Americana for Wall St. and the power hungry millionaires and billionaires who hate democracy.And of course, the media companies that are stenographers for the CIA, the politicians who pimp for them, and the vast interconnected power elites who cash in while playing innocent.
Finally, without having to explicitly say it, JFK Revisited makes it emphatically clear by presenting evidence that the criminals who committed this terrible crime, together with their media accomplices, were the only ones able to cover it up.Of course, there is more to this powerful and important film than I have mentioned here, all carefully laid out and documented. Those who criticized Stone’s earlier movie and continue to hurl insults at him rather than consider the evidence he and DiEugenio present are the worst kind of anti-intellectual sycophants. If they were forced to dispute the content of this film step-by-step, that would simply expose their agendas, something they must keep hidden to safeguard their establishment credentials. JFK Revisited ends with an important reminder from David Talbot that the truth of this film about an event that took place long ago is so essential to understand because of its contemporary relevance. It is not dead history. The “horror show” we are now experiencing has its roots in JFK’s public execution on the streets of Dallas, when the killers sent the most obvious message:Obey or you will suffer the same fate.
The United States is still controlled by the forces that killed President Kennedy – the CIA and those who comprise the national security state that wage war at home and abroad in contradistinction to everything JFK was trying to accomplish. Their cowardly allies in the media are everywhere.There is a reason why, as Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. tells the viewer near the film’s end, that all across the world there are streets named and statues erected to honor President Kennedy: for people know that he was a brave man of peace and human reconciliation and that he died at the hands of scoundrels intent on stopping his work.With JFK Revisited , Oliver Stone has truly honored this fallen hero. Like Jim Garrison in JFK , he offers this film as his closing statement to the jury, which is all of us. Here is the evidence. Consider it closely. Render your verdict.By doing so, we may yet take back the country from the forces of evil.Bravo to Stone and DiEugenio! They have created a tour de force.
[Link]
Conspiracies simply do not exist - except for the small ones, they exist, but the big, scary ones do not, and never have. Everyone knows that.
On 10 January 2022, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) decided to close land and air borders between member-countries and Mali and to freeze assets of the Republic of Mali in ECOWAS Central Banks, as sanctions in response to the announcement by the transitional authorities to postpone the presidential election to the end of 2026. Mali responded by closing its borders to all countries that support the sanctions announced by ECOWAS, with the exception of Guinea. France being one of those countries, the transitional authorities cancelled the military agreements that Mali had with France in the framework of the Barkhane Operation.Consequently, on 11 January 2022, Mali denounced the violation of its airspace by a French military aircraft flying in from the Ivory Coast, without authorization .
Barkhane Operation commander Major General Laurent Michon, who had evidently not been briefed about the political consequences of his own government’s actions, expressed his bewilderment in a letter he sent to the chief of staff of the Malian armed forces.
The Barkhane Operation had been deployed to fight against jihadist terrorists. However, despite the impressive feats carried out by the French military, jihadism has continued to grow stronger
This catastrophic outcome as compared to the stated objectives is in line with the strategy of the United States, which has decided to double its financial support for the French operation.On 8 October, Malian Prime Minister Choguel Kokalla Maïga publicly accused France of training the terrorists she claims to be fighting. He then recalled that France had prevented the Malian armed forces from entering the enclave of Kidal, a jihadist stronghold .
In short, the Mali transitional government has decided to turn to a Russian private military company, referred to by Western governments and media as the “Wagner Group”.
Sorry, but WHO created all those SECTS of TERRORIST around the WORLD???
I hope everyone knows that bin Laden repeatedly denied having anything to do with 9/11.
T
he entry of the Taliban into Kabul is a great defeat for the United States. A few months after the war against the Taliban began in 2001, US President George W. Bush announced:
"The Taliban regime is about to end."
Twenty years later, the opposite is now evident. But this US defeat - after spending $ 2.261 trillion and causing at least 241,000 deaths - is meager comfort to the people of Afghanistan, who will now have to deal with the harsh reality of Taliban rule. Since their formation in Pakistan in 1994, nothing progressive can be found in the words and actions of the Taliban over the course of nearly thirty years of history. Nor can anything progressive be found in the 20-year war that the United States waged against the Afghan people.
On April 16, 1967, the Cuban magazine Tricontinental published an article by Che Guevara entitled "Creating two, three, many Vietnams: This is our watchword". Guevara argued that the pressure on the Vietnamese people needed to be relieved by guerrilla struggles elsewhere. Eight years later, the United States fled Vietnam as US officials and their Vietnamese allies boarded helicopters from the roof of the CIA building in Saigon.
The defeat of the United States in Vietnam was part of a series of defeats for imperialism: Portugal capitulated the year before in Angola, Guinea-Bissau and Mozambique; workers and students overthrew the dictatorship of Thailand, initiating a process that culminated three years later in the student uprising of 1976; the communists seized power in Afghanistan with the Saur revolution in April 1978; the Iranian people mobilized for a year against the US-backed dictator, the Shah of Iran, leading to the revolution of January 1979; the socialist New Jewel Movement led a revolution in the small island state of Grenada; in June 1979, the Sandinistas entered Managua (Nicaragua) and overthrew the US-backed regime of Anastasio Somoza. These were some of the many Saigon, the many defeats of imperialism and the many victories - in one way or another - of the national liberation movements.
Each of these advances came with a different political tradition and a different pace. The most powerful mass revolt was in Iran, although it did not result in a socialist dynamic but in a clerical democracy. Each of these had to face the wrath of the United States and its allies, who would not have allowed these experiments - most of them socialist in nature - to germinate. A military dictatorship was encouraged in Thailand in 1976, proxy wars were set in motion in Afghanistan and Nicaragua, and Iraq was paid to invade Iran in September 1980. The US government tried by all means to deny sovereignty. to these countries and to bring them back to complete subordination.
Chaos ensued. Along two axes: the debt crisis and proxy wars. After non-aligned countries passed a resolution on the New International Economic Order (NIEO) in the United Nations General Assembly in 1974, they found themselves crushed by Western-dominated financial institutions, including the International Monetary Fund and the State Treasury Department. United. These institutions pushed the non-aligned states into a deep debt crisis; Mexico defaulted in 1982 and ushered in the current debt crisis of the so-called Third World. Furthermore, after the victory of the National Liberation Forces in the 1970s, a new series of proxy wars and regime change operations were launched to destabilize the politics of Africa, Asia and Latin America for two generations.
We have not yet emerged from the destruction caused by the Western politics of the 1970s.
Western obtuseness towards Afghanistan defines the nature of the counterrevolution and liberal interventionism. US President Jimmy Carter decided to put immense resources behind the worst elements of Afghan politics and to work with Pakistan and Saudi Arabia to destroy the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan (DRA).
Anahita Ratebzad, who was a minister in the first DRA government:
“We have faced serious challenges both inside the country - from those with a reactionary social view - and outside the country - from our opponents in the United States and Pakistan. ", he said. "A few months after our inauguration, in 1978, we knew that our enemies had united to undermine us and to prevent the arrival of democracy in Afghanistan" . It was Ratebzad who wrote in the Kabul New Times (1978) these words: “The privileges that women, by right, must have are equal education, job security, health services, and free time to raise a healthy generation. to build the future of the country… Educating and enlightening women is now the object of close attention from the government ” .
The hope of 1978 is now lost.
This pessimism is not to be blamed only on the Taliban, but also on those - such as the United States, Saudi Arabia, Germany and Pakistan - who have financed and supported the theocratic Taliban fascists. In the dust of the American war that began in 2001, women like Anahita Ratebzad were swept under the carpet; it suited the United States to see Afghan women as unable to help themselves, and therefore in need of US air raids and extraordinary detentions in Guantanamo. It has also been convenient for the United States to deny its active links with the worst theocrats and misogynists (people like Hekmatyar, who is no different from the Taliban).
The United States funded the mujahideen, undermined the DRA, induced reluctant Soviet intervention through the Amu Darya, and then increased the pressure on both the Soviets and the DRA by making Afghan counterrevolutionary forces and the Pakistani military dictatorship equal pawns in a fight against the United States. 'USSR. The Soviet withdrawal and the collapse of the DRA led to an even worse scenario, with a bloody civil war from which the Taliban emerged. The US war against the Taliban lasted twenty years but - despite the superior military technology of the United States - led to the defeat of the United States.
Imagine if the United States had not supported the mujahideen and if the Afghans had been allowed to consider the possibility of a democratic future. This would have been a struggle, with its pacing back and forth, but it would certainly have led to something better than what we have now: the return of the Taliban, the flogging of women in public and the enforcement of the worst social codes. Imagine it.
But these days with the defeat of US power does not necessarily come the possibility of exercising national sovereignty and advancing a democratic agenda. Indeed, with it comes chaos and suffering. Like Afghanistan, Haiti is also part of the debris of US interventionism, plagued by two American coups, an occupation of its political and economic life, and now by another earthquake. And the defeat in Afghanistan also reminds us of the US defeat in Iraq (2011); these two countries faced the ferocious military might of the United States, but did not come out as subordinates.
All this clarifies both the fury of the US war machine, capable of demolishing entire countries, but also the weakness of US power, unable to shape the world in its image. Afghanistan and Iraq have built state projects over hundreds of years. The United States destroyed their states in one afternoon.
Afghans are largely happy to see the end of the American occupation, to be another Saigon in a long sequence. But this is not a victory for humanity. It will not be easy for Afghanistan to emerge from these nightmare decades, but the desire to do so can still be felt.
Joe Wasn't there an article about how a flying frozen fish didn't hit the Pentagon? I've tried to find it without success.
Finally, a glitch/typo.. Thanks.
R.C.
it's a very bitter pill to swallow knowing your own kind were responsible for such an atrocity.
[Link]
And, now I have song to sing to myself while vacuuming; and you can sing along too, just change "onions" to "sottnet" and we can be co-linear together [Link]
Yemeni rebels launched a series of 30 attacks on the world's largest international airport: Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates). Abu Dhabi international airport was attacked by 20 attack drones (kamikaze drones - ed) and 10 unidentified ballistic missiles, the airport infrastructure was partially destroyed and the airport has problems with the acceptance of the aircraft.
According to official data, as a result of the attacks by Yemeni rebels, three people were killed and six were injured, however, taking into account unofficial data, there is talk of the death of at least three dozen people and a large number of injured . It is known that in addition to strikes at the new terminal of Abu Dhabi International Airport, strikes have also been carried out in the industrial zone. As a result, three oil deposits and a military airbase were destroyed, as a result of which several military aircraft were destroyed. "Small fragments of the drones were recovered from the explosion of three oil depots in an industrial area and from a fire in an airport," police said as Houthi rebels announced "military operations" in the United Arab Emirates.
The UAE, which significantly reduced its military presence in Yemen in 2019, continues to control the Yemeni forces it armed and trained. Drone strikes are a hallmark of the Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia, a UAE ally leading a coalition fighting for the Yemeni government in a brutal civil war.
According to updated data available by the current time, the UAE's air defense / missile defense systems have not intercepted a single ammunition fired by the Houthis.
And, interesting timing (or not), because a Tweet of mine, from 2017, linking to SOTTs Pentagon Flash Video just got pulled on 'copyright grounds'.
(this one :
[Link]
thanks itellsya
huh ... cannot give the direct link to .. the many saved instances .
fucking shenanigans sott
use web archive (below) and copy paste itellsya's link
[Link]
Rowan Cocoan I just ran through your living room, but you didn't see me.
just been looking at the declassified building plans,seems the spongy concrete (trapped air pockets) together with repellent covering, also assisted wing fold/recoil.
You should go write for the Babylon Bee: [Link]
Actually, the real truth, (as opposed to the unreal truth,) is that thousands of eyewitnesses saw some 500 Taliban jihadists, led by Osama Bin Laden himself, storming ashore from bateaux on the Potomac River and attacking the Pentagon with vicious machetes, and drones in the form of robot pigeons. At least 25 Pentagon employees fleeing the building were beheaded before a heroic fireman by the name of Ezekiel Farkas turned his hose on the ragheads and washed them all back into the Potomac, where they sank out of sight, (Afghans cannot swim,) only to be taken aboard an Iraqi submarine lurking below the surface, which then sailed down the Potomac and out into Chesapeake Bay. This was the secret reason we bombed and invaded Iraq, according to a secret source who works as a janitor in the CIA and spoke on condition of anonymity - it had absolutely nothing to do with Dick Cheney, Halliburton or Iraq's oil reserves, second only to those of Saudi Arabia, despite what Timmy Bigglesworth of South London had to say - what would HE know about anything?
the problem the jr bush was facing was however he had to decide to bomb "something" within the next 15 minutes - or to look weak to the general public; (eg to the likes of you) 😘
nowadays. i think the real problem is "any" "regime" on earth is able to obliviate "any" "regime" on earth 😱
Brought to us all by the magi-CIA-ns.
Theurgy in action by the GAOTU.
I'm shocked !
Or something like that ...
What happened could only happen in Amerika.
What the Hell'l're U going to do about it. Or anything at all.
Declaim all you like.
[Link]
And more than 2.3 Billion missing:
Black Eagle Trust Fund
The 9/11 Attacks and the Black Eagle Trust Fund"On that fateful day [9/11], the Securities and Exchange Commission declared a national emergency, and for the first time in U.S. history, invoked the emergency powers act, under Securities Exchange Act Section 12(k) easing regulatory restrictions for clearing and settling security trades for the next 15 days. These changes would allow an estimated $240 BILLION IN covert government securities to be cleared upon maturity without the standard regulatory controls around identification of ownership."
[Link]
Change of orthodoxy is probably the most difficult change to effect in a human being. 🦅🔥🏹
Not only is that official U.S. gunMINT statement a lie but the report is a complete
floccinaucinihilipilification.
🤡💩🎪