Puppet MastersS


Mr. Potato

The censoring of Alex Jones will come back to bite the Left in the rear

Mint Press News teleSUR
In the controversy surrounding the coordinated corporate censorship of Alex Jones' notorious Infowars franchise across multiple online platforms, journalist Glenn Greenwald made an under-appreciated tweet in response to the various leftists and Democrats who've attacked anyone objecting to the censorship as "defending Alex Jones."

"The world's dumbest and/or most deceitful people have always been those who equate 'I defend X's right to speak' with 'I defend X and their ideas,'" wrote Greenwald. "It's the scummiest tactic there is. They did it to Chomsky when he opposed prosecuting a Holocaust denier."

Bad Guys

Sinister Soros back to buying up social media again after denouncing companies and dumping shares last year

Georg Soros - Životno djelo i ciljevi genija zla
Months after denouncing social media as a "menace to society," controversial billionaire George Soros is again investing into Facebook, Twitter and streaming services Spotify and Pandora, while scaling back his Google holdings.

With hedge funds filing their second-quarter statements with regulators this week, it has emerged that Soros Fund Management LLC is once again investing in Facebook. The fund has also bought shares in Twitter and the two streaming platforms, while selling off some stock in Google's parent company Alphabet Inc. and Amazon.com.

News of Soros's acquisitions have raised suspicions in circles that have long seen Soros as a foe of copyrights.

Facebook and Twitter stocks were rising at the time Soros made the purchases in June, though both took a dive at the end of July over disappointing earnings reports. Pandora and Spotify stocks have been a haven of stable growth in comparison.

Comment: Soros is only too happy to manipulate the public and subvert democracies when it furthers his agenda, and he would certainly benefit having some control over social media which has proven to be a powerful tool in the information war:


Magnify

A closer look at what the OPCW did and didn't find in Douma

OPCW Douma
© John Thys / Agence France-Presse

1. Introduction. Why The Lack of Sarin is a Problem


This article considers in detail what was and wasn't found by the OPCW (Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons) in their investigation of the Douma chemical incident of April 7. Douma is a Damascus suburb, then under Islamist opposition control but on the verge of surrender, when activists reported a helicopter attack with two chemical "barrel bombs" containing chlorine gas and perhaps something deadlier. A reported 43 civilians or more were reportedly killed, and for supposedly obvious reasons, the ruling Islamists finalized their surrender the next day.

An OPCW Fact-Finding Mission (FFM) was swiftly formed and assembled in Syria by April 14, when the U.S. and allies launched missile strikes nearby. But the FFM had to wait another week before they were able to first access the attack sites on April 21. This delay was blamed on Damascus and their allies in Moscow, who were accused of buying time to scrub the crime scenes of clues. But in fact the UN's security agency UNDSS (Department of Safety and Security) was behind the small initial delay, and it was reasonable, considering the unknowns in an area ruled for six years by hard-line Islamists, and only formally liberated for a few days. The April 17 attack on the UNDSS advance security team by unidentified militants, wounding a Syrian officer, shows that the concerns the UNDSS shared with the Syrians and Russians were valid. In fact, this bad result to the rushed first try is what caused the ensuing four-day delay to re-plan the mission. [1]

With the release of the OPCW's interim report on July 6, we now have some information from those visits that might contain clues of any meddling. This report will be cited heavily in the following article. [2]

Comment: See also: Eyewitness in Douma: Syrian Civilians from Ground Zero Expose Chemical Weapons Hoax


Eye 1

The solution for the missing trillions: US gov audit standards to be "modified" under guise of 'national security'

us secret aircrat
The reason that they are kept under wraps is because of the technology. The US doesn’t want other countries learning the technology that goes into the making of them. Sikorsky UH – 60 – The date was May 11, 2011.
In an apparent departure from "generally accepted accounting principles," federal agencies will be permitted to publish financial statements that are altered so as to protect information on classified spending from disclosure.

The new policy was developed by the government's Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) in response to concerns raised by the Department of Defense and others that a rigorous audit of agency financial statements could lead to unauthorized disclosure of classified information.

In order to prevent disclosure of classified information in a public financial statement, FASAB said that agencies may amend or obscure certain spending information. "An entity may modify information required by other [accounting] standards if the effect of the modification does not change the net results of operations or net position."

Agencies may also shift accounts around in a potentially misleading way. "A component reporting entity is allowed to be excluded from one reporting entity and consolidated into another reporting entity. The effect of the modifications may change the net results of operations and/or net position." See Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards 56, FASAB, July 5, 2018 (final draft for sponsor review).

Comment: Reports of missing trillions have plagued the US government and its deepstate agencies for nearly two decades, and, by fiddling with the accounting standards, their ability to rob the American people will become even easier:



TV

"Saber-rattling": Russian Embassy slams UK media for "imaginary" Arctic threat

arctic military
© Sputnik / Yuriy Lushin
Russian Embassy in the United Kingdom criticized UK media on Wednesday for promoting the idea of countering the alleged threat from Russia in the Arctic via ​​a military build-up in the region.

"These speculations are yet another attempt to promote the idea of military build-up in the Arctic under imaginary pretexts. They run counter to the existing international legal framework and completely undermine huge efforts undertaken in the Arctic Council, where the UK is an observer state," the embassy's spokesperson said in a statement.

Earlier in the day, some UK media published excerpts of the report "On thin ice: UK defence in the Arctic" prepared by the Defence Sub-Committee of the House of Commons. Conclusions of the press report were reduced to the presence of "a serious threat to Britain from Russia on the Arctic flank" and the need to increase the capabilities of the UK army and increase defense spending.

Comment: This propaganda by the UK establishment serves a few purposes: It demonizes Russia, ramps up the fear to justify the increase of already bloated military budgets, and provides excuse for the West's military encroachment in the Arctic:


Jet5

Fake intercept: Russian MoD refutes UK claims of chasing off six Su-24 bombers over Black Sea

British Eurofighter Typhoon jets
© Darren Staples / ReutersBritish Eurofighter Typhoon jets
Russia has denied British claims that the Royal Air Force intercepted six Russian military jets over the Black Sea, saying the incident was a lot less dramatic and didn't feature a single Su-24 bomber mentioned in the reports.

Four aircraft from the Russian Black Sea Fleet naval aviation group carried out routine exercises above the Black Sea on Monday, the Defense Ministry spokesman told TASS, specifying that there were no Su-24 bombers in the group at all.

"After completing their flight task in the assigned area the Russian planes spotted a military aircraft of one of the NATO countries at the distance of 30 kilometers," he said.

Snakes in Suits

'In the name of #Resistance': After clearance pull, Democrats rush to back Brennan - who spied on them

Former CIA Director John Brennan
© Gray Cameron / ReutersFormer CIA Director John Brennan
Democrats have been vocal in condemning US President Donald Trump for revoking former CIA chief John Brennan's security clearance, forgetting that time he spied on a Democrat-run Senate committee in the name of #Resistance.

On Wednesday, Trump revoked Brennan's security clearance, which had allowed the ex-spymaster to continue to access classified documents since he resigned last January.

The White House said that Brennan used his security clearance to "sow division and chaos," and lend a sheen of credibility to his public criticisms of the president. The White House looked into revoking Brennan's clearance after he accused Trump of "treason" for meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin last month.

Straight away, Democrats jumped in to defend Brennan's character and to blast Trump for pulling his clearance. Rep. Adam Schiff (D-California), ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, said that "In adding John Brennan to his enemies list, Trump demonstrates again how deeply insecure and vindictive he is."

Comment: See also: Trump strikes back! Revokes arch criminal John Brennan's security clearance (VIDEO)


Better Earth

Best of the Web: Pepe Escobar: The Caspian sails towards Eurasian integration

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Kazakhstan President Nursultan Nazarbayev walk along a Caspian Sea embankment while participating in the Fifth Caspian Summit in Aktau, Kazakhstan.
© Sputnik/Aleksey NikolskyiRussian President Vladimir Putin and Kazakhstan President Nursultan Nazarbayev walk along a Caspian Sea embankment while participating in the Fifth Caspian Summit in Aktau, Kazakhstan.
The five states surrounding the sea - Russia, Azerbaijan, Iran, Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan - have reached difficult compromises on sovereign and exclusive rights as well as freedom of navigation

The long-awaited deal on the legal status of the Caspian Sea signed on Sunday in the Kazakh port of Aktau is a defining moment in the ongoing, massive drive towards Eurasia integration.

Up to the early 19th century, the quintessentially Eurasian body of water - a connectivity corridor between Asia and Europe over a wealth of oil and gas - was exclusive Persian property. Imperial Russia then took over the northern margin. After the break up of the USSR, the Caspian ended up being shared by five states; Russia, Iran, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan.

Comment: See also: Also check out SOTT radio's: Behind the Headlines: Trump Ditches Europe, Europe Bluffs, Russia and China Carry on With Eurasian Integration


Palette

Italian PM Salvini says EU deficit reduction rules limit infrastructure spending which risks lives

Matteo Salvini
© Tony Gentile / ReutersMatteo Salvini
Italy's Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini has laid the blame for the Genoa bridge collapse on the European Union, saying that spending restrictions has limited the country's investment in its infrastructure.

Salvini, the leader of the eurosceptic Northern League, told reporters in Sicily that the fall of the 100-meter-long stretch of the A10 motorway in the port city on Tuesday showed that budgetary strictures imposed by the EU are putting lives of Italians at risk.

"If external constraints prevent us from spending to have safe roads and schools, then it really calls into question whether it makes sense to follow these rules," said Salvini, according to Reuters. "There can be no tradeoff between fiscal rules and the safety of Italians."

At least 35 people are reported to have died in the incident. The bridge, known as the Ponte Morandi, was built in the late 1960s and has undergone various redevelopment works over the years. The director of motorway operator Autostrade said the collapse of the bridge was impossible to predict, but its design has come in for criticism in the past.

Comment: It is true, EU budgetary restrictions do mean there is less money available for Italy to spend it where it is needed. But while there are a great many disasters due to EU membership, Salvini would probably be taking the idea a little too far by conflating it with the bridge collapse.

See also:


X

What happens when powerful people get scared? Censorship

hand over mouth
© The Washington Post
"Only the weak hit the fly with a hammer." - Bangambiki Habyarimana

Anyone who tells you the recent escalation of censorship by U.S. tech giants is merely a reflection of private companies making independent decisions is either lying or dangerously ignorant.

In the case of Facebook, the road from pseudo-platform to willing and enthusiastic tool of establishment power players is fairly straightforward. It really got going earlier this year when issues surrounding egregious privacy violations in the case of Cambridge Analytica (stuff that had been going on for years) could finally be linked to the Trump campaign. It was at this point that powerful and nefarious forces spotted an opportunity to leverage the company's gigantic influence in distributing news and opinion for their own ends. Rather than hold executives to account and break up the company, the choice was made to commandeer and weaponize the platform. This is where we stand today.

Let's not whitewash history though. These tech companies have been compliant, out of control government snitches for a long time. Thanks to Edward Snowden, we're aware of the deep and longstanding cooperation between these lackeys and U.S. intelligence agencies in the realm of mass surveillance. As such, the most recent transformation of these companies into full fledged information gatekeepers should be seen in its proper context; merely as a dangerous continuation and expansion of an already entrenched reality.

Comment: Galvanizing the public to support lies and deception guarantees a diminishing threshold of investigation and reflective thinking as mass perception snowballs. Truth becomes the lie as lies replace the truth. Censorship is merely a barrier to support the process. Perhaps the next question should be: What happens when the public awakens and gets scared?