© DickDaniels (carolinabirds.org) [CC BY-SA 3.0 or GFDL] Wikimedia Commons.A red-legged honeycreeper (Cyanerpes cyaneus)
I recently had a lively conversation with a former colleague at the Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research in Cologne. We have been on good terms for more than thirty years now and continue to be so. The subject turned to intelligent design and he stated emphatically: "There is no irreducible complexity," and "There are no orphan genes." To which I responded, "Yes, and there is no [my interlocutor's name], either."
I thought of this exchange in considering Michael Behe's forthcoming book. Will it perhaps help our Darwinian friends to somewhat refine their assessments of ID?
ID critics appear to suspect something terrible is about to befall them when Behe's book,
Darwin Devolves: The New Science About DNA That Challenges Evolution, is published on February 26.
Some well-known and also lesser-known commentators were already more or less outraged months before publication. See
here,
here,
here, and
here for several examples.
What's the Fuss About?In his new work Behe has extended his studies on intelligent design to several fields of biology. Instead of regretting and repenting his former arguments - dismissed by Darwinists as
"totally wrong," "completely wrong," "dead wrong" - he now confirms them yet again: "The firm conclusion I've drawn over the past decades is this: despite occasional questions and bumps along the road,
the greater the progress of science, the more deeply into life design can be seen to extend." And "[A]lthough chance affects superficial aspects of biology, the newest evidence confirms
that life is the intended work of a mind and that that work extends much more deeply into life than could previously be seen." He even dares to substantiate his claims by clear and powerful scientific evidence. Outrageous indeed!
Comment: A lot can happen in 40 years so it's possible a solution will be found, whether civilization as we know it will make it that far is another consideration. But the idea of recycling human waste, as long as it really is beneficial and optimal just makes sense, and some cities have been exploring ideas from fertilization to power. It would also be helpful to the cause if the West and it's lackeys stopped using white phosphorous to commit war crimes: US coalition strikes Syrian town using banned white phosphorus (again)