Puppet Masters
In short, the moral foundations of objective right and wrong often linked to Christendom have eroded.
In their place the imperial oligarchs have erected a system that reverses what is good and replaces it with propaganda that leads to cultural decay and erasure of identity, according to Putin.
He suggests that traditional faith in God has been replaced by Satanism. It sounds crazy enough, but then again, there does seem to be at least some degree of affinity for occult religious practices among certain politically connected individuals. Whether it is "Satanism" or something altogether different, is a question we will leave others to decide.
He says parties which "promote the propaganda of pedophilia" have been seriously considered as legitimate due to the excesses of political correctness.
The speech has received renewed interest in light of the current investigation into US politicians involved in sex trafficking and pedophile rings (what many are calling #pedogate).
And Putin is not just talking, he's taking action too.
Fairly recently he implemented a ban on any US foster parents adopting Russian children.
The ban seems extreme, but one must admit it is true that the foster care industry in the US is rife with trafficking and child prostitution, using "adoption" as a front in many cases.
Putin then adds that while this moral crisis is happening at a national level, there are international attempts to eliminate sovereign nations and replace them with a system of globalized hegemony.
We know that we're supposed to listen to the corporate media and believe that Putin is inherently diabolical.
But on this point, at least, Putin is technically correct. There is indeed an international western power-structure bent on creating global Statehood or a unipolar geopolitical order. Rockefeller's recent death reminds us that he admitted he was part of this structure.
Perhaps this is why the prospect of national autonomy, whether it be in Africa or Latin America or the Middle East, has always frightened the global transnationalists.
Nations that do not cooperate with the shift into a global hegemonic order are demonized and propped up as bogeymen. A moment's reflection on history furnishes numerous examples.
A permanent, unelected form of government, or what is known as the deep state, usually creates a pretext for conquering such nations by force, eliminating their chance for self-determination.
Given Putin's views, it's perhaps natural to question if Russia has become the latest bogeyman for the deep state and its NATO allies.
As political philosopher Noam Chomsky has pointed out in the past, the deep state has multiple ways of taking down those who defy its quest for a globalized economic order.
It can send CIA operatives into the defiant nation who pose as "journalists" or "musicians." Those operatives begin spreading propaganda to incite a violent color revolution and install a US-friendly puppet.
As the defiant nation, you have a relatively narrow range of options. If you let the operatives spread the propaganda, you risk being violently overthrown, or becoming a failed state. If you imprison or assassinate the operatives, the deep state will then use its media broadcasting centers in the West to portray you as a blood thirsty dictator who kills journalists and musicians.
Another technique used by the deep state might be to attack its own political institutions and infrastructure and blame it on you. This can be done not only physically but digitally with tools that can leave a "fingerprint" falsely indicating that you were the attacker. It is then claimed that you are threatening democracy and must be eliminated.
In every case, the deep state will use the situation in an attempt to initiate military conflict and dominate the defiant country.
Watch the video and let us know what you think.
Reader Comments
In every case, the deep state will use the situation in an attempt to initiate military conflict and dominate the defiant country.Trouble here is Russia is not Iraq, or Libya. Russia is a large powerful country, with nuclear weapons.
The gloves are coming off! The west has lost all moral legitimacy. Hopefully millions around the world will hear this speech, and know who the real enemy is. The west has been ponerized, and that is what Putin is saying. Psychopaths have taken over just about everything. Great speech Mr Putin!
Conspiracy theorists argue that a depopulation agenda has been on the cards for years.
What is morally right to one could be reprehensible to another.
There is no common morality.
The only law that can make sense and can cover most major morality issues in a very simple way is this: Do no harm.
The only law that can make sense and can cover most major morality issues in a very simple way is this: Do no harm.I think that's the point. As the world exists today, major powers have great difficulty implementing even a simple rule like, "Do no harm". That says a lot.
Plus, "moral' doesn't need to mean "religion forced down your throat". As you say, it can be simpler and yet still effective. Having said that, I think many people prefer to have a religion or "code" to adhere to.
Living one's life for something greater than oneself is far more powerful than "follow the rules". We want purpose and meaning, and not just: do it like this or go to jail.
It could actually work perfectly well - and even remain flexible and open to the differences between people - if it weren't for pathologicals twisting it all into things like the Inquisitions.
i killed a bug yesterday, so I did harm. I ate cheese yesterday and consequently knowingly, willingly, intentionally did possible harm to trillions of microbes. Do no harm is relative. Speak truth is a constant.
In my opinion, Mr. Putin ought to continue his public exposing of pedophilia but leave his personal beliefs of an invisible deity heading up an authoritarian control system (aka argumentum ad absurdum) at home.
The Talmud Zionist Jews have penetrated our Government, Economy, Law, Education, Media, Entertainment with their filthy religious Talmudist divisive ideas and and their religion...There is NO separation of Church and State as far as they're concerned...All they've done is join their Zionism with our State/Politics whilst the Western Christian Ideology is the only thing that is being separated from the State...Very cunning aren't they.
Worth a thought or two I'd say.
Think about it.
Putin is making a choice.. Christian values or the Zionists will infiltrate Russia..Great example is the USA.
It's hardly a choice. As I said religion is here to stay whether we like it or not.
They have destroyed Russia before.
If you haven't seen this please watch...Well worth it.. [Link]
Thanks for your comment.
Why does one need religion to dictate morals or values? Answer: because one is an authoritarian.
Religion is not necessary; it is a tool of control.
Thanks for the video link.
They may be written in the texts but we've outgrown most stupidity by now.
Do some cherry picking, as they do, from the bible it's pretty good philosophy..that's the values Putins talking about.
Do we need religion for morals and values..in the long run no...right now yes...It's here to stay...so take your pick...Christian or Zion Talmud...Russia tried what I call "pseudo" Atheism.. man it was baaaaaadddd shit..brought to you by Zionist Jewish masters.
If you eliminated all religions from human memory i guarantee you imho that we would just create new one's and most would climb on board...
Please realize the Christian values Putin's talking about are non of the ones you mentioned...He calls those Satanic...
Religion is BS but it's entrenched...that's the reality...Atheism aint going to replace it any time soon...And if you watch the link I sent you that's what Zionism & Talmud are all about...
Christians have't much to be proud about either but most are educated enough now, women included, to move forward positively.
Religion is not Spirituality. Putin is Spiritual... that still may not make him perfect to some eyes.
foodfight ;-) Spirituality is in the gut baby
Right... they cant be all right and a libra is an absolute must... beepbeep
The fantasies occur thru multitude of interpretations (languages or style-of-tongue... La Tour de Babel)
But this is all alvailable online, if you are curious.
Bar Kochba how do you know he s a follower?
Anna1 Another way to put it would be: Religion is authoritarianism.
So is Fuckin Gravity...Grow up*Religion is authoritarian.Anna1 Another way to put it would be: Religion is authoritarianism.
If God created this reality for us to experience then God should have a say in how the planet is managed. Is that authoritarianism?
The words, "If God created this reality..." say it all. And yes, it is authoritarianism when one is supposedly given freewill but threatened with eternal damnation if one goes against "God's Will." That's just absurd and it's also an Appeal to Force. Teaching that ideology to a child is child abuse. (Not to mention the cannibalism I brought up earlier - if Putin accepts Communion, then he committing faux cannibalism).
In one of the bible myths, Lucifer is kicked out of heaven simply because he decides to think for himself and not to bow at God's feet. Lucifer was actually one of the first hypothetical "freethinkers," in my opinion.
But what is crazy to me is that people, in this day and age, still believe this type of fairy-story and base their entire lives and decisions on an invisible, imaginary deity or being(s). There is no rational, reasonable conversation to be had with a "True-Believer" in religion. They become irrational, angry, rude, etc, and cannot grasp the fundamentals of how logic works to help arrive at an objective veiwpoint of an independant reality.
And Putin is a follower of a religion, unfortunately.
From your language and emotional reaction, I would suggest you take your own advice. However, it's cool that you ultimately agree with me about religion being authoritarian.So is Fuckin Gravity...Grow up*Religion is authoritarian.Anna1 Another way to put it would be: Religion is authoritarianism.
If you are unfamiliar with authoritarianism (which seems to be the case, since you categorize non-human phenomena as such), here is a good start to learn about it:
[Link]
As a matter of fact, that's all it is, is an assumption. So far, I've seen no evidence of this.
However, I have seen evidence of irrational behavior related to irrational religious beliefs.
Thanks for the argument...kept me up till past 6am..havent slept yet...I'm stuffed now.
Different strokes for different folks. I don't "hate" authoritarianism, I disagree with it, just to be clear. In this day and age, semantics are very important; communicating clearly is paramount. Anyone who tells you different probably wants you to shut up about something or drop a subject.
Defining terms is important to avoid misunderstanding.
Semantics...??? Please get of you philosophical high horse and word games.
I haven't time to write a book on it...I don't like your air of superiority by stating that I don't understand the term...You're not willing to understand anything I said...It's all very simple logic...re-read..Positive Authoritarianism/Law is a necessary function of any system, nature, human or alien..If you want to argue with that what can I say...
lysna I see you are not willing to investigate the meaning of authoritarianism; that's okay. But it's difficult to argue a point if one does not understand the terms. You can still click on the link I provided and read the book. Or not.
Different strokes for different folks. I don't "hate" authoritarianism, I disagree with it, just to be clear. In this day and age, semantics are very important; communicating clearly is paramount. Anyone who tells you different probably wants you to shut up about something or drop a subject.
Bar Kochba i think sometimes one can drop a point to be argued for the sake of arguing and rather open up empathy channels. Sometimes hate doesnt mean hate but one needs to be willing to stretch into feeling to get this. Just saying.Your thought process allows you to change the definitions of words to fit your argument? Is this normally how you communicate ideas? When, in any use of the word, does "hate" not mean "hate?"
This is why semantics are important; if they weren't, then people would be changing their stories to fit their agendas (as evidenced here) instead presenting clear, concise points (which is best for understanding).
Thinking logically and communicating respectfully must not be part of your particular religion.
I'm promoting discernment, rather than bandwagon mentality.
Bar Kochba if you would sincerely agree... you wouldnt be collecting brownie points
I definitely disagree with authoritarianism and religion.
I reiterate that semantics are extremely important to rational discussion. In case anyone was curious, here is a definition of "semantics:"
"...the branch of linguistics and logic concerned with meaning. There are a number of branches and subbranches of semantics, including formal semantics, which studies the logical aspects of meaning, such as sense, reference, implication, and logical form, lexical semantics, which studies word meanings and word relations, and conceptual semantics, which studies the cognitive structure of meaning.the meaning of a word, phrase, sentence, or text."
Understanding each other is paramount to communication, and semantics are an integral part of that. I stress again that anyone who says that semantics are not important most likely either want you to shut up or are avoiding having to explain a statement.
Most commenters here seem to understand the issue clearly except for yourself.
No one is going to disagree that authoritarianism and religion have their negative sides. What I'm saying is that without "authority/law " there is nothing that exists that will function well without it." and in nature it is in place already for a reason.
Otherwise you get chaos...!!! It doesn't matter if its nature/environment, human, macro, micro, genetics, or whatever...There must be laws of authority to be followed or there will be disorder..
Whether we had Atheism or Religion running this world there still has to be some form of moral "authority/law" in control of either.
What is so hard to understand here that you have to bring up the definition of semantics for. ???
My original comment stands:
"While I applaud his stance on pedophilia, his stated religious beliefs cause me to question his core reasoning skills (unless he's willfully promoting a specific agenda; in that case, he knows exactly what he's doing).
In my opinion, Mr. Putin ought to continue his public exposing of pedophilia but leave his personal beliefs of an invisible deity heading up an authoritarian control system (aka argumentum ad absurdum) at home."
Accepting that others may possess a different opinion than yourself on a given topic and being capable of respectful discussion is a prerequisite of being an adult; obviously, some of the other participants are not willing to meet this prerequisite.
You, on the other hand, seem to mask mild condescension ("grow up, sit down") with your Four Agreements suggestion. Do you yourself follow the Four Agreements, or is that just for people whom you disagree with?
Bar Kochba i think Bark you either need to grow up, sit down, or read The Four Agreements. You are being the 'rude' one here obviously in denial.
Comment:
More on Pedogate: