Welcome to Sott.net
Wed, 08 Dec 2021
The World for People who Think

Health & Wellness


Doctors in Singapore urge expert committee on Covid-19 vaccination to stop vaccine drive for school boys: Media report

Sinovac Vaccination in Singapore.
People queue to enquire about Sinovac vaccine at a clinic, during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in Singapore June 18, 2021.
The letter by the doctors group comes amid parental concerns and worries about mRNA vaccines, which include the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, after data on myocarditis among healthy young males was published

A group of doctors, including cardiologists, in Singapore have urged the nation's expert committee on COVID-19 vaccination to halt the vaccine exercise for some 200,000 school boys, following the death of a 13-year-old student in the US after he was jabbed, a media report said on Sunday.

In an open letter, which was posted on Facebook on Saturday by a cardiologist Dr Kho Kwang Po and addressed to chairman of the expert committee Professor Benjamin Ong, the doctors said that vaccination exercise needs to be delayed briefly until the CDC and other organisations worldwide have produced more robust and convincing data on the case, The Straits Times reported.

The US media on Thursday reported that a boy from Saginaw county in Michigan died three days after getting his second dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, supposedly from heart failure.

It is unclear which vaccine he had received.

Comment: According to statistics, Singapore has a total population of 5,896,422 people. If 36 people died from COVID-19, then the total mortality rate is 0.0006%. So, basically, it is nothing to worry about.

In 2018 Singapore had 5,638,700 people. The same year 120 people died in car accidents. That is 0.0021%.
It means that far more people died in car accidents in Singapore in 2018 than from Covid-19 in the last 2 years.

See also:

SOTT Logo Radio

Objective:Health - The Spike Protein is Toxic

O:H header
Last month a Canadian cancer vaccine researcher Byram Brindle came forward to reveal some truly astounding news about the spike protein component of of the COVID-19 virus. "We made a big mistake. We didn't realize it until now," he is quoted as saying in an interview on "ON Point with Alex Pierson". In the interview, Brindle discusses peer reviewed research that give some truly stunning reasons behind vaccine side effects such as heart inflammation, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), and many others.

That reason is that the spike protein itself is a pathogenic protein, a toxin. So while mRNA vaccine researchers had designed their experimental shots to force the body into making what they thought was a benign component of the virus in order to mount an immune response, what they've actually done is forced people's bodies into making a toxin.

On top of this, there is a Japanese study Brindle received through a Freedom of Information Request that shows that vaccine material travels from the injection site to collect in large concentrations in multiple organ systems including the spleen, bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands and — in "quite high concentrations" — in the ovaries.

Join us on this episode of Objective:Health, as we delve into the implications of this startling discovery.

And check us out on Brighteon!

For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:

♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
♥Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channel/objectivehealth
♥LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@objectivehealth:f
♥Odysee: https://odysee.com/@objectivehealth:f

And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here:


Running Time: 00:36:20

Download: MP3 — 33.3 MB


The final nail in the coffin of medical research

The lamps are going out all over Europe, we shall not see them lit again in our life-time." Edward Grey
Medical Fraud
© Phil Richards Insurance.com
Several years ago, I wrote a book called Doctoring Data. It was my attempt to help people navigate their way through medical headlines and medical data.

One of the main reasons I was stimulated to write it, is because I had become deeply concerned that science, especially medical science, had been almost fully taken over by commercial interests. With the end result that much of the data we were getting bombarded with was enormously biased, and thus corrupted. I wanted to show how some of this bias gets built in.

I was not alone in my concerns. As far back as 2005, John Ioannidis wrote the very highly cited paper 'Why most Published Research Findings are False'. It has been downloaded and read by many, many, thousands of researchers over the years, so they can't say they don't know:
Moreover for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias. 1
Marcia Angell, who edited the New England Journal of Medicine for twenty years, wrote the following. It is a quote I have used many times, in many different talks:
It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgement of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.
Peter Gotzsche, who set up the Nordic Cochrane Collaboration, and who was booted out of said Cochrane collaboration for questioning the HPV vaccine (used to prevent cervical cancer) wrote the book. Deadly Medicine and Organised Crime. [How big pharma has corrupted healthcare].

The book cover states...
The main reason we take so many drugs is that drug companies don't sell drugs, they sell lies about drugs... virtually everything we know about drugs is what the companies have chosen to tell us and our doctors... if you don't believe the system is out of control, please e-mail me and explain why drugs are the third leading cause of death.


WHO: 'Children should not be vaccinated for the moment'

In updated guidance, the World Health Organization said children have milder disease compared to adults and there is not enough evidence to recommend vaccinating children against COVID.

EDITOR'S NOTE: After this article was published on The Defender June 22, the World Health Organization (WHO) edited its latest guidance on who should get the COVID vaccine by removing the sentence: "Children should not be vaccinated for the moment," and instead saying that a panel of experts had found the vaccine "suitable for use" by children over the age of 12. Here's a side-by-side comparison of the WHO website page as it was before it was updated and how it looks now. The red hairline box was added to highlight the sentence that was removed.

Comment: COVID-19 mRNA vaccines likely linked to rare heart condition in kids: CDC panel


FDA to add warning about rare heart inflammation to Pfizer, Moderna vaccines

nurse mask pfizer vaccine
© REUTERS/Jeenah Moon
A nurse Cindy Mendez wearing a protective mask holds a syringe with a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, at NYC Health + Hospitals Harlem Hospital in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S., February 25, 2021.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration said on Wednesday it plans to move quickly to add a warning about rare cases of heart inflammation in adolescents and young adults to fact sheets for the Pfizer/BioNTech (PFE.N), and Moderna (MRNA.O) COVID-19 vaccines.

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) advisory groups, meeting to discuss reported cases of the heart condition after vaccination, found the inflammation in adolescents and young adults is likely linked to the vaccines, but that the benefits of the shots appeared to clearly outweigh the risk.

Moderna shares closed down 4.2%, while Pfizer fell 1.4%.

Comment: They can spin it as 'rare' and tell everyone they should not deviate from getting their shots, but the fact remains that these mRNA shots are not "risk free" and therefore any coercion methods being propagated are completely unethical.

See also:


Hope for IBS sufferers as new study suggests synthetic tarantula venom could help treat condition

tarantula spider
© REUTERS/Toby Melville
Zoo keeper Jamie Mitchell places a red-kneed tarantula spider on weighing scales at ZSL London Zoo 2020 weigh-in and measurement, in London, Britain, August 27, 2020.
A component of tarantula venom has been identified as a promising treatment for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), a chronic disorder that currently has no cure. The chemical has been successfully tested on mice.

IBS is a common chronic condition that can cause abdominal pain and other unpleasant symptoms. Exactly why and how it develops remains unclear and there is no specific treatment, though dietary changes may help some patients.

A group of researchers from Australia, the US, and Germany may have discovered a method to significantly improve the quality of life of IBS sufferers by blocking the pain in a targeted way.

The study, as described in the American Chemical Society's Pharmacology & Translational Science journal, was to test a specific protein that can be found in venom produced by some tarantula species.

Comment: While the treatment might help with pain relief, it doesn't appear to treat the cause. For that, we may need to look into our microbiome.


COVID-19 mRNA vaccines likely linked to rare heart condition in kids: CDC panel

vaccination children
© SOPA Images/LightRocket via Gett
A CDC panel has suggested vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna may be linked to rare heart inflammation in kids.

Comment: See also:

Arrow Down

Do doctors understand probability?

© Sebastian Rushworth.com
I'm very interested in how doctors think. How do we use the information gained from talking to and examining a patient to reach a reasonable list of likely diagnoses (a so called "differential")? When we order a test, what specifically are we looking for, and how will we react to the result that comes back? More cynically, I'm curious about the extent to which we understand what the test result actually means. And what are the odds that we will make a correct decision based on the answer we get back?

I think that anyone who has even a partial understanding of what doctors do understands that the practice of medicine, although based on scientific knowledge, isn't a science. Rather it is an art form. And as with all art forms, there are those who excel, and those who plod along, occasionally producing something nice or useful. Most people are probably aware of the fact that if you go to five different doctors with a problem, there is a significant probability that you will get five different answers. Medicine is so complex, with so many different variables to consider, and doctors themselves are so varied in terms of how they think and what they know, that the end result of any one consultation will often vary wildly.

One of the things that always needs to be estimated in any individual consultation is probability. What is the probability that the breast lump is cancer? What is the probability that the fever is due to a serious bacterial infection? When faced with these questions, I think most doctors are more like an experienced chess player than a robot. They act on a feeling, not on a conscious weighing of probabilities. Doctors with a nervous disposition therefore order more tests and prescribe more antibiotics, while those with a more relaxed disposition order fewer tests and prescribe fewer antibiotics.

But how good is the average doctor?

SOTT Logo Radio

Objective:Health: - Physicians and Researchers Speak Out

O:H header
"You're not a doctor!" How many times have we had this appeal to authority thrown in our faces when trying to make an argument against the dominant narrative of the day? The authoritarian mindset will only accept arguments, no matter how logical and well-reasoned, if they're coming from the mouth of a properly respected authority figure, like a doctor.

This is why it is so valuable when doctors speak out against the narratives of the day. When an authority figure comes forward with narrative shattering info, at least some people (those not too under the spell of the talking heads in the mainstream media) might actually take notice and may even start to think.

On this episode of Objective:Health, we look at some of the brave doctors who have stepped up to speak publicly about the failures of the Covid narrative.

For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:

♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
♥Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channel/objectivehealth
♥LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@objectivehealth:f
♥Odysee: https://odysee.com/@objectivehealth:f

And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here:


Running Time: 00:34:40

Download: MP3 — 31.8 MB


CDC senior scientist: 'We trashed data showing vaccine-autism link in African-American boys'

dr william thompson quote
© Vaxxed
Here is the full statement by current CDC Senior Scientist on Vaccine-Autism questions: Dr. William Thompson. Stay tuned to this website for an update on the story, soon.
I regret that my [CDC] coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the Journal of Pediatrics.

My primary job duties while working in the immunization safety branch from 2000 to 2006 were to lead or colead three major vaccine safety studies. The MADDSP MMR-Autism Cases Control Study was being carried out in response to the Wakefield Lancet study that suggested an association between the MMR vaccine and an autism-like health outcome. There were several major concerns among scientists and consumer advocates outside the CDC in the fall of 2000 regarding the execution of the Verstraeten study.

Comment: For more details on the revelations of CDC whistleblower Dr. William Thompson, watch the 2016 documentary Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Catastrophe.

See also: