Welcome to Sott.net
Thu, 28 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Health & Wellness
Map

Syringe

Spreading false vax info might cost you your medical license

no covid vaccine sign doctor
From: Spreading False Vax Info Might Cost You Your Medical License — Federation Of State Medical Boards Threaten Disciplinary Action, 3 August 2021
Physicians who intentionally spread misinformation or disinformation about the COVID-19 vaccines could be disciplined by state medical boards and may have their licenses suspended or taken away, said the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB).

Due "to a dramatic increase in the dissemination of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation and disinformation by physicians and other health care professionals on social media platforms, online and in the media," the FSMB, a national nonprofit representing medical boards that license and discipline allopathic and osteopathic physicians, issued the following statement:

Comment: In other words, don't deviate from 'consensus', Doc, or we'll revoke your license.

More from Becker's Health IT:
FSMB has not yet formally defined "misinformation" or "disinformation" in its policy, but the organization's ethics committee is studying the issues of physician misinformation and disinformation and plans to provide more guidance at a later date, an FSMB spokesperson said in an emailed statement to Becker's.

"However, we currently view misinformation as sharing or distributing verifiably false information," the spokesperson said. "We define disinformation as sharing or distributing information that the distributor knows is false."

While FSMB has not formed a recommendation yet for the definitions of misinformation and disinformation, state and territorial medical boards may use various terms, such as "professional misconduct" or "ethics violation," in their own procedures to address concerns surrounding misinformation and disinformation, FSMB said.
See also:


Syringe

Mercola: mRNA expert Robert Malone speaks out on the COVID crisis

dr robert malone
When Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology,1 spoke out about the risks of COVID-19 gene therapy vaccines in June 2021, he was surprised that the three-hour interview went viral. "It showed there was a huge thirst for information from people all over the world," he said, speaking with Aga Wilson with Newsvoice.2

The podcast was erased from YouTube, and Malone quickly realized that his message, which he felt morally obliged to share, would not be heard via mainstream media.

"When it became clear to me that I would not be able to speak through mainstream media, I, together with my wife ... made a conscious decision to reach out through alternative media and new media, and I've learned, from many, many podcasts and podcasters like yourself about the value of this new medium of podcasting," he told Wilson.3

Comment: See also:


Syringe

Media blackout: Renowned German pathologist's vaccine autopsy data is shocking... and being censored

prof peter schirmacher
Dr. Peter Schirmacher is not just an average pathologist. The German doctor is world-renowned in his field, honored by The Pathologist as one of the 100 most influential in the world. He is the acting chairman of the German Society of Pathology, director of the Institute of Pathology at Heidelberg University Hospital, and president of the German Association for the Study of the Liver. Bottom line, this professor and doctor understands pathology like very few on the planet.

This is why it's so perplexing that a bombshell report he released this week has been absolutely censored. Mainstream media won't report on it and Big Tech has eliminated accounts who attempt to share it. Considering the incessant push towards universal vaccinations by government, academia, media, and Big Tech, it really shouldn't be perplexing at all that his work is being quashed because it details mind-blowing data about the dangers of the so-called Covid "vaccines."

In short, Dr. Schirmacher performed autopsies on 40 people who had died within two weeks of receiving a Covid jab. Of those, 30%-40% could be directly attributed to the "vaccines." He is calling for more autopsies of those who die shortly after getting injected to see if his numbers pan out. But Germany has thus far been reluctant to act. Meanwhile, the report of this highly respected pathologist and pro-vaccine doctor is being suppressed.

Comment: The original quoted article in German can be found here.

Seeing how the powers that be respond to this information will be very telling. If they really were concerned about the health and wellness of the population at large, they would accept Schirmacher's warning and increase the number of autopsies performed on individuals who died after getting the jab. After all, what harm could there be in uncovering the truth? Either the doctor is right, and the vaccination campaign would need to be suspended due to safety concerns, or he is wrong and the campaign can continue unimpeded (and likely vaccine uptake would increase, as some vaccination hold-outs would have at least some of their fears alleviated). It is highly unlikely that the elites will respond in this manner, however; the good doctor will probably be ignored or smeared.

See also:


Arrow Down

Should we be surprised that Covid case numbers have been falling?

covid case numbers dropping
© Oxford Blavatnik School
"Scientists are scratching their heads over the precipitous decline in daily COVID-19 infections", says a recent article in the journal Nature. "A sharp fall in the number of people testing positive has surprised scientists", says a piece in the FT. According to the epidemiologist John Edmunds, "Nobody really knows what's going on".

Should scientists really be surprised by the fall in case numbers? Yes, some remaining restrictions were lifted on 19th July - the UK's supposed 'Freedom Day'. But cases have fallen in the absence of restrictions many times before. It's therefore hardly surprising they would do so again.

Bacon

Japan's centenarians have unique gut bacteria, bile may hold clues to longevity

japan old ladies
Centenarians have unique gut bacteria that enables them to live to a ripe old age, according to new research. Scientists in Japan say this unique gut makeup fuels bile acids that protect against disease.

The discovery could lead to yogurts and other probiotic foods that increase longevity.

"In people over the age of 100, an enrichment in a distinct set of gut microbes generate unique bile acids," says lead author Professor Kenya Honda of Keio University in a statement per South West News Service. "They might inhibit the growth of pathogens."

Comment: One wonders what part diet has to play in all this; notably, Japanese citizens from the island of Okinawa are known for their exceptional health and longevity - even amongst the famously long-lived Japanese - and one particular difference in their diet is a lower intake of rice along with a higher rate of consumption of fatty pork:


Pills

'For $1/day'... Double-blind ivermectin study reveals COVID patients recover more quickly, are less infectious

Ivermectin
A double-blind Israeli study has concluded that Ivermectin, an inexpensive anti-parasitic widely used since 1981, reduces both the duration and infectiousness of Covid-19, according to the Jerusalem Post.

The study, conducted by Prof. Eli Schwartz, founder of the Center for Travel Medicine and Tropical Disease at Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer, looked at some 89 eligible volunteers over the age of 18 who had tested positive for coronavirus, and were living in state-run Covid-19 hotels. After being divided into two groups, 50% received ivermectin, and 50% received a placebo. Each patient was given the drug for three days in a row, an hour before eating.

83% of participants were symptomatic at recruitment. 13.5% of patients had comorbidities of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, hypertension or cancer. The median age of the patients was 35, ranging from 20 to 71-years-old.

Results

Treatment was discontinued on the third day, and patients were monitored every two days thereafter. By day six, 72% of those treated with ivermectin tested negative for the virus, vs. 50% of those who received the placebo. Meanwhile, just 13% of ivermectin patients were able to infect others after six days compared to 50% of the placebo group - nearly four times as many.

Hospitalizations

Three patients in the placebo group were admitted to hospitals for respiratory symptoms, while one ivermectin patient was hospitalized for shortness of breath the day the study began - only to be discharged a day later and "sent back to the hotel in good condition," according to the study.

"Our study shows first and foremost that ivermectin has antiviral activity," said Schwartz, adding "It also shows that there is almost a 100% chance that a person will be noninfectious in four to six days, which could lead to shortening isolation time for these people. This could have a huge economic and social impact."

The study, which appeared on the MedRxiv preprint server and has not yet been peer-reviewed. That said, Schwartz pointed out that similar studies - 'though not all of them conducted to the same double-blind and placebo standards as his' - also showed favorable results for the drug.

Comment: For more on the treatment of COVID-19 using ivermectin see:


Cult

British study shows children UNLIKELY to contract severe Covid but UK wants to vaccinate them anyway

UK SCHOOL COVID CORONAVIRUS
© REUTERS/Kevin Coombs
Year six pupils arrive at St John's Primary School in Fulham, West London, Britain, June 2, 2020.
A new study has found that prolonged illness from Covid among minors is uncommon, reaffirming data showing that the virus is rarely deadly for children. The findings come as the UK prepares to start giving teens the shot.

The research, conducted by King's College London scientists, revealed that children aged between 5 and 17 who test positive for coronavirus typically recover in less than a week.

Headaches and tiredness were the most common symptoms observed, according to their paper, which was published on Tuesday in the Lancet.

Using data provided by parents to a non-profit group that supports Covid research, the study examined medical information collected from 1,734 minors who developed symptoms and tested positive for the virus between September 2020 and February 2021.

Comment: It was only last month that the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) stated: "The health benefits in this population are small, and the benefits to the wider population are highly uncertain. At this time, JCVI is of the view that the health benefits of universal vaccination in children and young people below the age of 18 years do not outweigh the potential risks".

Just two weeks later they have made a complete U-turn and advised that healthy 16 to 17-year-olds should be offered the first dose of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, just in time for No. 10's scientists to reveal that children as young as 12 would be offered jabs later this year. Most concerning is that children may not need parental consent to get the jab.


Network

Dr. Mercola to delete ALL CONTENT from website. Future articles available for 48 hours only

Mercola
Today, I have the most important announcement in the quarter of a century history of this newsletter. My goal and passion has always been about supporting you and helping you take control of your health. I am beyond thrilled that there are tens of millions of people who have benefited from what I have shared over the years.

I am filled with joy and gratitude every time I travel and lecture as invariably many people tell me how I've changed their lives by providing vital information they couldn't find anywhere else and even better that was completely free.

Comment: Mercola and his team have been the target of vicious attacks and defamation for several years. However, since the onset of the COVID "pandemic", they have become victims of a targeted disinformation campaign aimed at destroying their reputation, censoring their online presence and silencing them.

See also:


SOTT Logo Radio

Objective:Health - The People Have Spoken: Protests Against Draconian Covid Measures Around the World

O:H header
We're finally seeing some tangible pushback from the public at large about the draconian clamp-down on civil rights and freedoms! On July 24, around the world hundreds of thousands of people were on the streets for the 'World Wide Rally for Freedom,' as people fed up with the totalitarian measures enacted by the elites on the populace made their voices heard.

Outside of this one day, there have been numerous additional protests popping up allover the world. Could this finally be the people power we've been waiting for, or is it only going to cement the resolve of the powers that be and lead to even more overt clampdowns on human rights?

Tune in to this episode of Objective:Health as we talk about protests around the world - the People have spoken!


And check us out on Brighteon!

For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:

♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
♥Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channel/objectivehealth
♥LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@objectivehealth:f
♥Odysee: https://odysee.com/@objectivehealth:f

And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16H-nK-N0ANdsA5JFTT12_HU5nUYRVS9YcQh331dG2MI/edit?usp=sharing

Running Time: 00:33:58

Download: MP3 — 31.1 MB


Info

Omega-3 and heart disease

Omega 3
© Sebastian Rushworth.com

I have a confession to make. For at least the last ten years, I've taken an omega-3 supplement every day. Religiously. Why? I literally have no idea. I don't remember exactly when or why I started taking it. Presumably I read somewhere that it was a good idea. This was before I started studying medicine, and the decision certainly wasn't based on any thorough evaluation of the scientific evidence. So I figure it's probably about time I actually take a look at the evidence, before I decide whether to continue spending hundreds of dollars a year on omega-3 supplements.

The most commonly claimed benefit when it comes to omega-3 is that it prevents heart disease. This dates back to the 1970's, when it was noted that Inuit following a traditional diet rich in meat from whales and seals suffered from remarkably little cardiovascular disease. It was suggested that this might be due to the high levels of omega-3 fatty acids in meat from marine mammals. Of course, correlation is not causation, and I can think of several other major differences between the traditional inuit diet and the standard western diet that could explain the lack of heart disease, such as the complete absence of sugar.

Since then, there have been many randomized trials looking specifically at omega-3 for the prevention of heart disease. In 2018 the Cochrane collaboration carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis, with the goal of answering the question definitively. The review included both randomized controlled trials of omega-3 supplementation and of advice to eat more fatty fish. The requirements for inclusion in the systematic review were that the trials follow participants for at least one year, and provide data on mortality or outcomes related to heart disease.