Puppet MastersS

Info

Finland and Sweden 'can count' on Germany for protection and NATO membership support

Sanna Marin Olaf Scholz Magdalena Andersson
© Hannibal Hanschke/Getty ImagesFinnish Prime Minister Sanna Marin, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Swedish Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson address the media.
Chancellor Olaf Scholz expresses support for potential membership bids by both countries.

Finland and Sweden "can count" on Germany's support should they decide to join the NATO alliance, Chancellor Olaf Scholz said Tuesday, adding that both countries were already benefitting from EU military protection in case of an attack.

Speaking at Schloss Meseberg, the chancellor's retreat north of Berlin, Scholz said that Russia's invasion of Ukraine violated "all legal agreements and understandings which we had found in Europe in the last decades ... and therefore nobody can be sure that the Russian president and the Russian government will not break international law and our agreements by force on another occasion."

Scholz, who was addressing reporters alongside Finnish Prime Minister Sanna Marin and her Swedish counterpart Magdalena Andersson, said that Germany was "following very closely" the debate in both countries about their potential accession to NATO, and added: "For us it is clear: If these two countries decide that they want to be part of the NATO alliance, then they can count on our support."

Comment: See also:


Vader

Washington hopes to re-establish its hyper-power thanks to the war in Ukraine

taiwain delegation  World League for Freedom and Democracy (WLFD)
On January 23, 2022, the Taiwanese delegation hosted the annual convention of the World League for Freedom and Democracy (WLFD), the current name of the former World Anti-Communist League (WACL). The cold warriors are still there.
The evolution of the Russian military operation in Ukraine into a real war between Moscow and Washington has opened a Pandora's box. The objectives of the Westerners are adapting. It is no longer a question of defending the Banderites against Russia, but of weakening both sides (including the European Union) in order to restore the American hyper-power and its unipolar world.

The resurrection of the Cold Warriors

In two months, the Russian special military operation against the Banderites has turned into a real war between the Russians and the Donbass People's Republics on the one hand and the Nato-backed Ukrainians on the other.

A Ukrainian victory would be a blow against Russia and a Russian victory would mark the death of NATO. Neither of the two protagonists can back down. So all moves are allowed.

Eye 1

European Parliament drafts 'veto overhaul' following Hungary's possible dissent to not sanction Russia

EU European Union flags
© Yves Herman / Reuters
Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi has urged the EU to make key decisions by a qualified majority, rather than seeking unanimous consent of its member states.

Draghi said that in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic and Russia's military campaign in Ukraine, the EU must learn to work more robustly and effectively.

"The geopolitical situation is undergoing rapid and profound change. We have to move, and move as quickly as possible," Draghi told the European Parliament on Tuesday.


Comment: 'Moving quickly' seems to be an increasingly common tactic by technocrats seeking to ram through tyrannical legislation; the contrived coronavirus crisis 'emergency laws' for lockdowns being one of the most egregious examples.


Snakes in Suits

'A sulky liver sausage': Germany demands expulsion of Ukraine's ambassador for insulting Chancellor

Melnyk
Andriy Melnyk (pictured), Ukraine's Ambassador to Germany
Germany MP Sevim Dagdalen demands the expulsion of Ukraine's ambassador after he insulted Olaf Scholz.

German daily Die Welt reported that some Berlin officials have stood up for Chancellor Olaf Scholz after he was insulted by the Ukrainian Ambassador to Germany, Andriy Melnyk, who called Scholz an "offended liverwurst".

Bundestag MP Sevim Dagdalen demanded the ambassador's expulsion from Germany, saying "Whoever doesn't expel the supporter of Nazism Melnyk now has lost all self-respect."

Comment: Daily Mail provides more details:
Ukraine's ambassador to Berlin called Germany's chancellor Olaf Scholz a 'sulky liver sausage' for hinting he won't visit Ukraine like other European leaders.

Mr Scholz suggested that he would not visit Kyiv after the German president Frank-Walter Steinmeier's offer to visit was rejected, he has also been accused by President Volodymyr Zelensky of having close ties to the Kremlin.

The relationship between Ukraine and Germany has been strained during Russia's invasion, as Mr Scholz has been criticised by Kyiv for weak sanctions against Putin and for a lack of military support.


Unlike much of the West, Germany has been comparatively restrained reasoning that under international law participating in certain actions could make it 'party' to the war on Russia.


'You can't do that,' Mr Scholz told ZDF, a German public broadcaster, on Monday.

'It can't work that when a country has provided so much military aid, so much financial aid โ€” which is needed โ€” when it's a question of the security guarantees that will be important to Ukraine in the future โ€” you then say: But the president can't come.'

However Ukraine's envoy to Berlin, Andriy Melnyk, said: 'Acting like a sulky liver sausage doesn't sound very statesmanlike.

Steinmeier
German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier (pictured) has not visited Kyiv like many other European leaders, after his offer last month to meet with Zelensky was snubbed
Meanwhile Germany's conservative opposition leader Friedrich Merz visited Kyiv for meetings with Ukrainian officials.

He has previously accused Scholz of weak leadership and of 'procrastination, dithering and timidity'.

Last week Germany announced it would deliver anti-aircraft tanks to Ukraine for the first time, which signalled a major shift in policy.

The Chairman of the German Christian Democratic Party (CDU) Friedrich Merz was in Irpin today

Their announcement that they could quit Russian oil by late summer, further highlighted a show of support for Ukraine.

Mr Scholz denied claims their response to Russia's invasion was hesitant: 'I've always made quick decisions, in tandem with everyone else... but my line is that we act in a level-headed and prudent manner.'

He insisted Germany is 'firmly by the side' of Ukraine, with officials citing their recent actions such as the suspension of Nord Stream 2 and additional military support.

He also vowed that sanctions would not be lifted until Putin signs a peace deal with Ukraine.

This week the European Commission is expected to propose their sixth package of sanctions against Russia.

Which may include a possible embargo on buying Russian oil - which Germany said on Monday it was prepared to back.

Ambassadors from EU countries will discuss the proposed oil sanctions on Wednesday.
And that's just what the Ukrainian puppets say in public; this also reflects just how subservient to the agenda European leaders are that they apparently have little choice but to take it: Zelensky is Not in Charge of Ukraine, Nazis Are - And They Believe They Are on a Mission From God to 'Derussify Ukraine in Holy War'

Also check out SOTT radio's: NewsReal: Russia's Invasion of Ukraine: Context And Near-Future Outcomes




Target

NATO vehicles carrying arms in Ukraine will be considered 'legitimate target' - Russian Defense Minister

US ukraine exercise
© Twitter/ AmFlusU.S. Army paratroopers assigned to Exercise Shield 22 at Kamenjak, Croatia, April 9, 2022.
Russian Defense Minister Shoigu pointed out that the United States and its allies are continuing to supply weapons to Ukraine.

On May 4, while the European Union (EU) continues to study new sanctions against Russia, the Kremlin confirmed that it will continue its special military operation in Ukraine. Below are the main developments of this conflict as they happen.

Russia will target North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) vehicles transporting weapons in Ukraine. On Wednesday, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said that "any transport from the Atlantic Alliance that arrives in the country with weapons or means for the Ukrainian Armed Forces will be seen by us as a legitimate target."

Comment: Also check out SOTT radio's: NewsReal: Russia's Invasion of Ukraine: Context And Near-Future Outcomes




Stock Down

EU plans to block Russians from buying real estate as part of 6th round of sanctions

Europe EU HQ
© XinhuaNorwegian experts claim that corruption, instability, poverty and issues with democracy would prevent Kiev from swift accession
The European Commission intends to ban individuals and legal entities from Russia from buying property in Europe as part of the sixth round of sanctions, Bloomberg reported. The ban applies to Russians who are not EU citizens and do not have a residence permit in EU member states.

The proposal of the European Commission provides for a ban on the direct or indirect sale or transfer of ownership of real estate located in the territory of the EU, or shares in collective investment enterprises that provide access to such real estate, the document said.

Earlier, the Wall Street Journal reported the details of the sixth package of EU anti-Russian sanctions. They assume the refusal to purchase Russian oil within six months, and the cessation of imports of petroleum products by the end of the year. It is assumed that Slovakia and Hungary will receive 20 months to refuse to import Russian oil. Two more countries claim the same benefits - the Czech Republic and Bulgaria. The approval of sanctions requires the consent of all EU member states. Representatives of the countries of the union are planning to make a decision this week.


Comment: Hungary has said that it would veto such moves, however rumour has it that the EU intends to simply remove its ability to do so.


Comment: What are the chances that, as with the last 5 rounds of sanctions, this one will also backfire terribly for the EU?




Briefcase

The irrational, misguided discourse surrounding Supreme Court controversies such as Roe v. Wade

Supreme Court
© Anna Moneymaker/Getty ImagesProtesters outside U.S. Supreme Court โ€ข May 3, 2022
The Court, like the U.S. Constitution, was designed to be a limit on the excesses of democracy. Roe denied, not upheld, the rights of citizens to decide democratically.

Politico on Monday night published what certainly appears to be a genuine draft decision by Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito that would overturn the Court's 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade. Alito's draft ruling would decide the pending case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which concerns the constitutionality of a 2018 Mississippi law that bans abortions after fifteen weeks of pregnancy except in the case of medical emergency or severe fetal abnormalities. Given existing Supreme Court precedent that abortion can only be restricted after fetal viability, Mississippi's ban on abortions after the 15th week โ€” at a point when the fetus is not yet deemed viable โ€” is constitutionally dubious. To uphold Mississippi's law โ€” as six of the nine Justices reportedly wish to do โ€” the Court must either find that the law is consistent with existing abortion precedent, or acknowledge that it conflicts with existing precedent and then overrule that precedent on the ground that it was wrongly decided.

Alito's draft is written as a majority opinion, suggesting that at least five of the Court's justices โ€” a majority โ€” voted after oral argument in Dobbs to overrule Roe on the ground that it was "egregiously wrong from the start" and "deeply damaging." In an extremely rare event for the Court, an unknown person with unknown motives leaked the draft opinion to Politico, which justifiably published it. A subsequent leak to CNN on Monday night claimed that the five justices in favor of overruling Roe were Bush 43 appointee Alito, Bush 41 appointee Clarence Thomas, and three Trump appointees (Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett), while Chief Justice Roberts, appointed by Bush 43, is prepared to uphold the constitutionality of Mississippi's abortion law without overruling Roe.

Comment: What SCOTUS is qualified to do or not do - are important issues. The fundamental basis of the republic was built upon the constitutional rights of the individual, not the majority.


Blue Planet

Europe's long, hot summer ahead

man w gun
© energyintel/brightspotcdn
While some observers predicted a short conflict resulting in a decisive Russian victory, the war in Ukraine has turned into a classic military slugfest, the outcome of which is uncertain. Both Russia and the US agree that the future of European security is at stake, and as such neither appears willing to accept anything less than total victory for their side. The result is a dangerous stalemate that runs the risk of escalating into a larger European conflict.

As Russia and Ukraine enter the third month of what Russia euphemistically calls its "special military operation," but which the rest of the world views as little more than the outright invasion, occupation and dismemberment of Ukraine, any expectation of a quick and easy Russian victory has been dashed by the unexpected tenacity of the Ukrainian defenders and the harsh realities of modern large-scale ground combat.

While the final outcome of the conflict has yet to be determined, the unforgiving metrics of modern military math suggest Russia is approaching a point where its superiority in firepower and maneuver on the battlefield will at some point achieve a victory in southern and eastern Ukraine that will result in consolidation of Russian control over the entire Donbas region, along with a strategically important land bridge connecting Crimea with the territory of the Russian Federation. Russia's stated military objective of "liberating" the Donbas region will have been accomplished.

Any consolidation of Russian control over this region could, however, be just a means to a larger goal of creating a new security framework in Europe that addresses Russian security demands

Attention

Supreme Court scandal: Leaked Supreme Court opinion overruling Roe v. Wade - 'time to heed the Constitution,' returns abortion to elected officials

USSC
© Getty ImagesUS Supreme Court
A draft Supreme Court opinion overruling Roe v. Wade has been leaked to the press in one of the greatest scandals to ever hit the nation's highest court and a possible attempt to intimidate one or more justices to reverse their vote or to ignite a liberal brushfire to pack the Supreme Court before Democrats lose Congress in November.

"It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people's elected representatives," the possible draft opinion by Justice Samuel Alito reads, making the case that where the Constitution is silent, the American people govern themselves through elections and elected leaders, not federal judges. It quotes the late Justice Antonin Scalia, who said:
"The permissibility of abortion, and the limitations upon it, are to be resolved like most important questions in our democracy: by citizens trying to persuade one another and then voting." It then adds, "That is what the Constitution and the rule of law demand."
The document published by Politico that claims to be a draft opinion appears to be authentic, but it is not a binding decision of the court unless at least five justices sign it, and this looks like a transparent and unprecedented betrayal by one of the 45 or so people with access to a draft Supreme Court opinion to prevent this decision from becoming law by scaring off moderate justices and attempting to whip the political left into a frenzy.

Comment: Trigger law would ban abortion in Texas if Roe v. Wade is overturned:
A so-called "trigger law" that would go into effect in 30 days if the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade would make performing abortion a felony in Texas.

Driving the news: According to a draft opinion obtained by Politico โ€” which Axios cannot independently verify โ€” the U.S. Supreme Court intends to overturn the landmark 1973 case, reversing five decades of constitutional protection for abortion.

Flashback: A law passed by the Texas legislature last year would make exceptions only to save the life of a pregnant patient or if a pregnant person risks "substantial impairment of major bodily function," per the Austin-American Statesman.
  • Under the law, doctors could face life in prison and fines up to $100,000 if they perform abortions.
  • The law does not make exceptions for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest.
Zoom out: Texas is one of 13 states with laws that would ban abortions if Roe v. Wade is overturned, and more would likely follow suit quickly, per Axios' Oriana Gonzalez.
  • Oklahoma, Louisiana and Arkansas โ€” three of Texas' four border states โ€” have similar laws.
By the numbers: A University of Texas poll in February found that 40% of Texans "strongly oppose" a law banning all abortions, including 20% of Republicans.
  • Another 13% of respondents said they "somewhat oppose" the law.
  • Only 20% of respondents โ€” including 33% of Republicans โ€” "strongly support" a total ban.
Then there is Biden's opinion:
President Biden declared Tuesday that a woman's right to have an abortion is "fundamental" and called on voters to elect more pro-abortion rights officials at the federal level in November so that Democrats can pass legislation protecting abortion rights. He said in a written statement:
"I believe that a woman's right to choose is fundamental, Roe has been the law of the land for almost fifty years, and basic fairness and the stability of our law demand that it not be overturned.

"If the Court does overturn Roe, it will fall on our nation's elected officials at all levels of government to protect a woman's right to choose. And it will fall on voters to elect pro-choice officials this November. We do not know whether this draft is genuine, or whether it reflects the final decision of the Court."
Biden also noted that the White House counsel's office and the Gender Policy Council have been working on options to respond to potential outcomes in the Supreme Court case, work that began in the wake of bills restricting abortions in states like Texas.

The leaked opinion sent shockwaves through Washington, with Democrats condemning the forthcoming decision as an assault on women's rights. Some also revived a push to eliminate the legislative filibuster to pass abortion protections.

Roberts said in a statement:
"Court employees have an exemplary and important tradition of respecting the confidentiality of the judicial process and upholding the trust of the Court. This was a singular and egregious breach of that trust that is an affront to the Court and the community of public servants who work here."
Kill the messenger! Calls for exile!
The leak, which Senator Marsha Blackburn attributed to a "radical activist," essentially forced a legal dispute into the public arena. Blackburn, a Republican from Tennessee, tweeted on Tuesday:


One clerk working for Justice Sonia Sotomayor has already been touted as the likely culprit, though this has not been proven. A 1992 ruling upholding Roe v. Wade - Planned Parenthood v. Casey - would also be overturned.

The court is not set to issue its opinion on Roe v. Wade until late June, when it will possibly rule on the Mississippi abortion case that put the 1973 precedent in its crosshairs.

According to CBS News, Chief Justice John Roberts will likely order an FBI investigation.



Cell Phone

CDC tracked millions of phones to see if Americans followed COVID lockdown orders

CDC tracking
© Yoshi Sodeoka/Getty Images/KJNCDC Cellphone Tracking in Real Time
Newly released documents showed the CDC planned to use phone location data to monitor schools and churches, and wanted to use the data for many non-COVID-19 purposes, too.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) bought access to location data harvested from tens of millions of phones in the United States to perform analysis of compliance with curfews, track patterns of people visiting K-12 schools, and specifically monitor the effectiveness of policy in the Navajo Nation, according to CDC documents obtained by Motherboard. The documents also show that although the CDC used COVID-19 as a reason to buy access to the data more quickly, it intended to use it for more-general CDC purposes.

Location data is information on a device's location sourced from the phone, which can then show where a person lives, works, and where they went. The sort of data the CDC bought was aggregated โ€” meaning it was designed to follow trends that emerge from the movements of groups of people โ€” but researchers have repeatedly raised concerns with how location data can be deanonymized and used to track specific people.