Puppet MastersS

Eye 1

Best of the Web: The convenient timing of US troops killed in Syria

us troops syria
With unseemly haste, US news media leapt on the killing of four American military personnel in Syria as a way to undermine President Donald Trump's plan to withdraw troops from that country.

The deadly attack in the northern city of Manbij, on the west bank of the Euphrates River, was reported to have been carried out by a suicide bomber. The Islamic State (ISIS) terror group reportedly claimed responsibility, but the group routinely makes such claims which often turn out to be false.

The American military personnel were said to be on a routine patrol of Manbij where US forces have been backing Kurdish militants in a purported campaign against ISIS and other terror groups.

An explosion at a restaurant resulted in two US troops and two Pentagon civilian officials being killed, along with more than a dozen other victims. Three other US military persons were among those injured.

US media highlighted the bombing as the biggest single death toll of American forces in Syria since they began operations in the country nearly four years ago.

Comment: See also:


Brick Wall

Trump campaign to troll Pelosi and Schumer by sending faux red bricks to their offices

Trump Pelosi Schumer bricks
© Trump campaignPresident Trumpโ€™s re-election campaign said Friday they are sending faux red bricks to the offices of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer until Democrats agree to fund a border wall amid the fight over the partial government shutdown.
President Trump's re-election campaign said Friday it'll send faux red bricks to the offices of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer until Democrats agree to fund a border wall.

To raise money for the 2020 race, the Trump campaign is asking donors to chip in $20.20 for each fake brick, which will be sent to the Democratic congressional leaders amid the fight that underlies the extended partial government shutdown.

"Since Chuck and Nancy keep stonewalling the president, we'll send the wall to them, brick by brick, until they agree to secure the border," said Brad Parscale, Trump's campaign manager.

Chess

Palestine to launch new bid to become full member of United Nations

United Nations General Assembly.
© Patrick Gruban, via Wikimedia CommonsUnited Nations General Assembly.
The Palestinians will launch a bid to become a full member of the United Nations even though such a move will be blocked by the United States, the Palestinian foreign minister said Tuesday.

"We know that we are going to face a U.S. veto but that won't prevent us from presenting our application" for full UN membership, Palestinian foreign minister Riyad al-Maliki told journalists.

Any request to become a UN member-state must first be approved by the Security Council, where the United States has veto power before it is endorsed by the General Assembly.


Bell

SOTT Focus: Manbij False-Flag: The Empire Devours Its Own Soldiers

manbij
Immediately after Donald Trump's announcement of a withdrawal of American troops from Syria on December 19th, the Kurdish leadership reportedly threatened to set free hundreds of Islamic State's prisoners and their family members being held in makeshift prisons in the Kurdish-held areas of Syria.

Some of those prisoners are foreign fighters, and their countries of origin - Western countries in particular - are unwilling to accept them since they lack evidence to prosecute them. Though the Kurds have since backtracked on their statement, it shows the level of frustration shown by the Kurdish leadership regarding President Trump's abrupt and apparently whimsical decision to pull American forces out of Syria after a telephone conversation with Turkish President Erdogan on December 14th.

The next step the Kurdish leadership took was to rush to Paris to hold discussions with French President Emmanuel Macron - who has donned the globalist, interventionist cap since the inauguration of an isolationist, "alt-right" president in the US in January 2017.

President Macron reassured the Kurdish leadership that hundreds of French troops stationed in Syria as part of the globalists' "coalition to battle the Islamic State" will remain there and take the lead after the withdrawal of the 2,000 American troops, though it is unlikely that the French forces will stay in Syria for long once the American forces pull out. Particularly if we keep the fact in mind that President Macron has been facing the biggest challenge to his presidency in recent months in the form of Yellow Vest protests.

Footprints

A US withdrawal from NATO would most benefit Americans

NATO meeting
© Unknown
Alleged discussions between US President Donald Trump and his aides about a US withdrawal from NATO have been making headlines recently.

The New York Times in an article titled, "Trump Discussed Pulling U.S. From NATO, Aides Say Amid New Concerns Over Russia," would claim:
There are few things that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia desires more than the weakening of NATO, the military alliance among the United States, Europe and Canada that has deterred Soviet and Russian aggression for 70 years.

Last year, President Trump suggested a move tantamount to destroying NATO: the withdrawal of the United States.
And while the division or dissolving of NATO most certainly would benefit Russia - removing a malignant and aggressive rogue institution from its borders and the toxic atmosphere of perpetual confrontation it creates - it would also most certainly benefit each and every NATO member many times more.

Despite the many myths surrounding NATO's role in "protecting" its individual members, nothing has undermined the security of NATO member states more than NATO itself.

Rocket

Trump's 'Mission Impossible': Making his unrealistic missile plan workable

Trump MI
© YouTube/KJN
After spending over $300 billion on missile defense programs since 1983, America has the ability to deter short- and medium-range ballistic missiles. Expanding that to a global defense system is undoable and unaffordable.

Missile defense is the longest running scam in the history of the Department of Defense. The new Missile Defense Review continues that proud tradition.

It scares us with warnings of "more than 20 nations with missile technology" when there are really only three nations we have to worry about: Russia, China and North Korea. It promises a near-perfect "shield," but offers very little in specific, workable programs. Worse, the review and the inflated rhetoric around its release worsen the very problem it claims to solve: an uncontrolled new arms race.

I have boxes of Congressional testimony in my office from Pentagon officials who solemnly swore in the 1980s that they had "promising," "cost-effective," "new" technologies that would soon give the United States the ability - as President Donald Trump claimed on Thursday - "to terminate any missile launches from hostile powers . . . regardless of the missile type or geographic origins of the attack."

True believers have long held out that goal for missile defense. It has proven impossible to achieve. Instead they have left behind a legacy of inflated threats, lofty promises, and grandiose plans followed by the deployment of quite limited and flawed defensive systems.

Comment: The dynamics of the arms race is outpacing Western critical thinking, achievable hardware and financial capabilities. Odds are that dominance will never again be in the US' favor, and regaining parity has become questionable. A comprehensive treaty, restricting missile programs to defensive postures for all parties of this capability, may be the only deterrent - one the US should be authoring and advancing.


Arrow Down

Special Council makes rare statement casting doubt on BuzzFeed News' Cohen report

CohenTrump
© Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call; Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty ImagesFormer Trump lawyer Michael Cohen and President Donald Trump
Special Counsel Robert Mueller's office has disputed a report in BuzzFeed News that U.S. President Donald Trump directed his former lawyer to lie to Congress about a real estate project in Moscow as Congressional Democrats vowed to investigate allegations.

In a first for the Mueller investigation, the Special Counsel's Office commented on a media report, saying in a January 18 statement that the allegations, based on two unnamed law enforcement sources, were not "accurate."

"BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate," Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller's office, said in the statement, though he did not say the entire article was wrong.

BuzzFeed said in a statement that it was standing by its reporting and urged the Special Counsel "to make clear what he's disputing."

The White House has called the allegations "categorically false," but leading Democrat lawmakers said the possibility the report is true was a "concern of the greatest magnitude" and would seek an inquiry into the matter.

Comment: What a ruckus this has raised!

More from RT 1/19/2019:
While half of Congress took to Twitter to wave the story as the long-awaited proof of Collusion, the BuzzFeed reporters could not seem to agree on their own sourcing. Anthony Cormier admitted to CNN he hadn't seen the proof directly but had two "law enforcement" sources claiming they had seen it, while Jason Leopold told MSNBC they had in fact seen the documents themselves.

Mueller has been extremely tight-lipped about the numerous previous "Russiagate" scoops, and considering the time and effort involved in his own ongoing crusade to take Trump down, his dismissal of BuzzFeed's would-be bombshell knocked the legs out from under a story whose vague sourcing had already raised questions. Mueller's laconic smackdown has led many on Twitter to declare BuzzFeed officially discredited.
RT reports 1/19/2019:


RT reports 1/19/2019:
After the "bombshell" was picked up (to a great extent uncritically) by the mainstream media, which floated impeachment through a legion of ever-ready pundits, the scoop was busted by the office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller himself.


Conservative political columnist Ann Coulter, Trump's son Donald Junior, former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, and NRA spokesperson Dana Loesch all tore into BuzzFeed, along with thousands of less high-profile Trump supporters, getting the #RIPBuzzfeed hashtag going.




Facing a torrent of mockery and derision, BuzzFeed chose to stand by its claims. BuzzFeed Editor-in-Chief Ben Smith called on Mueller to clarify what exactly he had denied. "We stand by our reporting and the sources who informed it," he tweeted.

Some mainstream media, like the Washington Post and the New York Times, have been pouring cold water on the report (using unnamed sources of their own).

MSNBC's Chris Matthews argued that the fact the report is inaccurate "does not mean it is not true," while NBC's Ken Dilanian said Mueller denied only that part of the report that said he had obtained Trump organization documents supporting the allegations.

Dilanian, however, later admitted that he "was interpreting the pushback too narrowly."

The Washington Post shared that sentiment, reporting that Mueller's statement "aims to make clear that none of those statements in the story are accurate," while citing "people familiar with the matter."

The New York Times also debunked the story, citing a person familiar with Cohen's testimony, who told them that the disgraced former lawyer "never implied the president had pressured him to lie to Congress."


While multiple outlets were busy distancing themselves from the red-faced BuzzFeed, lone voices from the anti-Trump resistance crowd, almost drowned out by the avalanche of mockery, jumped to its defense.


Some suggested that the zeal with which the mainstream media ganged up on BuzzFeed is a clumsy attempt to save face.


And, The Daily Caller 1/18/2019 had this:
CNN and MSNBC collectively used the word "impeach" nearly 200 times on Friday before the Special Counsel's office disputed a bombshell report by BuzzFeed News.

According to a Daily Caller review of TV clipping service Grabien, personalities on CNN and MSNBC used the words "Impeach," "Impeachment," or "Impeachable," 179 times.

The review included only original Friday programming and ran up until each network learned that BuzzFeed's report was in dispute - shortly before 8 pm.

CNN mentioned impeachment 82 times while MSNBC mentioned it a whopping 97 times.

While some anchors and pundits hedged that the BuzzFeed story could only lead to impeachment proceedings "if true," others repeated the story more uncritically and suggested that the president would be forced to resign and might even face obstruction of justice charges.

MSNBC's Katy Tur, for example, stated at the top of her show that "Donald Trump is facing the most damming report to date for his presidency. A story that could lead to his impeachment."

Both outlets also interviewed a number of Democratic congresspeople to get their thoughts on the possibility of impeachment of the president. CNN's Wolf Blitzer, for example, spoke to Democratic Rep. Jim Himes about the implications of the BuzzFeed report if it turned out to be verified, while MSNBC host Chris Matthews brought on Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu.

Matthews was perhaps the most eager cable television host to prop up BuzzFeed's report, even insisting after the Special Counsel's office's statement that, "not accurate ... it doesn't mean it's not true."

BuzzFeed's story, dependent on two anonymous sources, alleged that former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen was directed by President Donald Trump to lie about business deals in Moscow during the 2016 presidential campaign.

A spokesperson for Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team disputed the crux of the report within 24 hours of its publication, stating, "BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate."
See also: BuzzFeed 'reports' Trump "personally instructed" Cohen to lie to Congress about Moscow project - UDATE: Buzzfeed story completely discredited


Handcuffs

Ex-colleague: Detained Iranian journalist 'mistreated in prison, family kept in the dark'

Nargess Moballeghi
© RTNargess Moballeghi, an independent journalist and a former colleague of US-born Press TV journalist Marzieh Hashemi, speaks to RT about Hashemi's detention in the US.
US-born journalist Marzieh Hashemi had her religious rights violated in jail, where she was put shortly after coming to the US from Iran, her representative has told RT. Her family, meanwhile, has received no answers from the FBI.

Nargess Moballeghi, an independent journalist and former colleague of Hashemi, who was detained by US federal agents in St. Louis on Sunday, told RT that the 59-year-old's family has been kept in the dark by the US authorities about the cause of their mother and grandmother's detention.

Hashemi is a US citizen who was born in New Orleans into a Christian African-American family. She converted to Islam in the wake of the 1979 Islamic revolution and has gained recognition for anchoring programs on Press TV, an English-language Iranian network.

Hashemi was detained by the FBI as she was about to board an internal US flight from Lambert International Airport in St. Louis to Denver, meaning that when the FBI swooped down on her, she had already crossed the US border, Moballeghi told RT, speaking on Hashemi's behalf.


Comment: For more on the detainment of Marzieh Hashemi:


Stop

Turkey opposes Damascus taking control in Manbij

Manbij border
© SputnikSyrian armed forces deployed along Manbij Border, Aleppo Province, December 30, 2018.
Ankara opposes the presence of Syrian government troops in Manbij and considers clearing the region of the Kurdish-led People's Protection Units (YPG) a matter of national security, the Turkish Foreign Ministry's spokesman Hami Aksoy said Friday.

Aksoy told reporters:
"In no case can we facilitate provocations by the Syrian regime [Damascus] in Manbij, as well as attempts by members of the YPG to open the door to the regime's forces. Clearing the YPG out of Manbij is a matter of national security for us. The terrorist attack in Manbij once again showed the importance of clearing the region of terrorists and the need to implement the road map for Manbij."
His comments come after on Wednesday, about two dozen people, including up to five US servicemen, were killed in Manbij in an explosion for which the Daesh terrorist group claimed responsibility.

In December, the YPG announced its withdrawal from Manbij and called on Damascus to take control of the city to protect the area in the event Ankara launched a military operation against the Kurds.

Comment: More from Sputnik 1/18/2019:
Former US Special Envoy for the Global Coalition to defeat the Daesh terror group Brett McGurk said that Turkey is not a reliable partner in Syria as the United States prepares to withdraw military forces from the country. Turkey cannot operate in Syria without substantial US military support, he added.

Discussions are underway to have the Turkish military or Turkish-backed opposition fighters moved into areas of northeastern Syria that are now controlled by the SDF. Any such move, he said, would spark chaos and create an environment for extremists to thrive. The entry of Turkish-backed opposition forces would also likely displace thousands of Kurds and threaten vulnerable Christian communities in areas of eastern Syria, he added.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan...had decided to postpone the start of the military operation in Syria after a phone conversation with Trump on December 14, during which the US president also revealed his plans to withdraw troops from Syria.



Snakes in Suits

Former PM Hekmatyar joins Afghanistan presidential race in 2019

Supporters Hekmatyar
© AFP/AREF KARIMISupporters of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar
Former Afghan prime minister, warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar on Saturday announced that he will run in the country's presidential elections in July 2019, Afghanistan's 1TV channel reported.

The channel reported, citing Hekmatyar, that the former insurgent would run for the presidency as an independent candidate.

Hekmatyar noted that the current Afghan government was a reason for the continuing war in the country, and the system must be changed in a peaceful way.

On December 30, the Independent Election Commission of Afghanistan announced that the country's presidential election, initially scheduled for April 20, would be pushed back to July 20 due to the problems the country faced during the parliamentary elections in October 2018 and the preparation of talks on a peace agreement with the Taliban radical movement.

In September 2016, the Afghan government signed a peace agreement with Hekmatyar's Hezb-e Islam faction, which has waged a violent insurgency against the government for the past 15 years. Since 2001 Hezb-e Islami has launched attacks on both US and Afghan forces.

Hekmatyar headed a notorious opposition faction against the Afghan government during the 1979-1989 civil war. He served as prime minister in the mujahideen government when another civil war raged from 1992 to 1996, before defecting to help the Taliban take over the country. Rights groups claim he is responsible for torturing and murdering scores of civilians including Soviet troops.