OF THE
TIMES
"The concentric tubes at the core of the planetarium are where my faith in Greek tech falters, and where the model might also falter," said Wojcik. "Lathes would be the way today, but we can't assume they had those for metal."Maybe they had some "help" from "The Tool and Die Shop in the Sky" [Link] where they mighta had the Cosmic Release of COMSOL :-)
Goblets that are magnetic only on the inside?That might mean they understood a usipolar magnetic field, in which case they understood how to create "free" energy. This is a long story, a version of which I've worked on for a long time based on work done by my dearly missed friend Bruce DePalma
Engineers generally understand the Universe is "Push-me/Pull me." What ever you try take out of something/someplace subtracts from somewhere else.Yes, and those who poke more and in different ways sometimes come up with surprising results. Here's a [Link] to a test of an early version of Bruce DePalma's "N-Generator" that is worth the read for the conclusions alone.
His closing comment; " the obvious application of using the output of a "free-energy" generator to provide its own motive power, and thus truly produce a source of free energy, has occured to a number of people and several such machines have been built. At least one of these known to me [13], using what seemed to be a good design techniques, was unsuccessful." underscores to me the unlikelihood of anyone doing so, for the simple reason our command of molding matter into shapes and forms that are essentially lossless to power generation and distribution will prevent attainment of over unity energy production.While the italicized bit above certainly is true enough, the matter doesn't resolve by such means. Rather it begins to resolve by fundamental reconsideration of what 'space' and 'matter might' actually be.
We have been mislead . . .A general conclusion brought home to me on many levels from an early age. Hence my baby Tshirt moniker....
Was not aware you were enjoying this exchange.Greatly . . .
Being in retirement for a decade it was a bit of a challenge to dust off all the old savvy.It's good for your thought pot mate.
I just don't get why the astronomical community doesn't grasp this concept. Are they all that gullible?Good pot @ 4AM ?
Good pot @ 4AM ?Eh? Lost me. Which kind of pot? My bride often does her judgment execution about midnite....
Eh? Lost me. Which kind of pot? My bride often does her judgment execution about midnite....Hah, now I'm lost. "judgement execution" ?
Have you seen Don Scott's presentation on "free-space" magnetic fields? [Link]I hadn't and it's so interesting I pulled it down so I can watch it about 5 more times. I think maybe that explains why iron fillings on a piece of paper over a bar magnet form lines of "flux"; something I've only lately wondered about.
Just a few details to nail down in figuring out how a rotating field can produce charge flow, like a vibrating crystal.Oh FUCK that's funny ! !
but I think the key to unravelling the N Machine is remembering charge flow.I think you're right and I think Tewari thought the same thing.
Then there's Burton Babb's spaced-wound loudspeaker voice . . .should be:
Then there's Burton Babb's spaced-wound loudspeaker voice coil . . .
. . . listening to him and his buddies talk about A1J Boxes and stuff felt the same as reading that.I have no idea what an 'A1J Box' might be . . . ?
The truth is we really know squat about the past, and ditto about the present.That's about right . . . and even less about the future, except that for most it's gonna suck too . . . :-(
Comment: See also: