Puppet Masters
This is not speculation. They have already started in France, in the U.K. (see this document), at the E.U. level, in the United States and they are going to attempt to push this on a global scale (also see this). All nicely coordinated to ride the wave of outrage that followed the attacks.
If you want a glimpse at just how far they want to take this, look at France. They're already dealing out serious prison sentences for those caught saying anything that could be interpreted as supporting terrorism. Does questioning the official story count as supporting terrorism? Where do you draw the line? Who decides?
Oh, so you don't actually have to support terrorism. Just disagreeing is enough.
Humanity, do you really want to learn this lesson the hard way, again?
They are playing you people: Problem, Reaction, Solution. It's the oldest trick in the book.
With so much riding on this story, obviously there are those who have a vested interest in preventing evidence which contradicts the official narrative from reaching the public.
On January 10th we uploaded a video entitled "Charlie Hebdo Shootings - Censored Video". Within 24 hours it had over a million views. Then the video was age restricted and removed from listings in spite of the fact that it depicted no blood, no gore, no graphic violence of any kind. It did, however, challenge the official narrative of the event. In spite of being age restricted the video continued to grow and added another million views.
We uploaded a French translation of this same video on January 12th. Within one day, the French version was taken down completely. Not age restricted, not blocked in some countries, completely deleted from the site. Again, this video showed no blood or gore whatsoever. In fact it didn't even show actual murder.
We're not going to show that footage again here. We're not going to give them any excuse to block this video. However if you enter the following url into your browser: http://stormcloudsgathering.com/charlie-hebdo-cover-up) you will find a download link to the original files. Watch it and come to your own conclusions.
Of course, there is much more at stake here than our little video, or even the attacks themselves. The internet as a whole poses a threat to the ruling class, because in its current form ideas cannot be fully controlled. The internet in its current form makes it very hard for them to hide their corruption, their wars of aggression, and their covert operations, and that makes it hard to govern. They intend to change that (for your security of course).
Funny isn't it, 17 people people get killed in France, supposedly over a question of free speech, and the first thing that governments of the world want to do is use that event to take away free speech on the internet.
It's also funny that these same governments expressed no outrage whatsoever as the United States military killed hundreds of thousands of civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and elsewhere.
Apparently it's not murder if you use a drone or a guided missile. Apparently it's not terrorism if women and children are killed by soldiers and government bureaucrats. No, it's only murder when politicians and the corporate media tell you it's murder, and if they get their way, they'll be able to take down any website, video or social media account that dares contradict them.
There's one question on many of your minds right now. What can we do? How can we fight back?
Well, first of all, stop waiting for instructions. Do what you can. Use the talent you have. Get creative. Remember necessity is the mother of invention. If each and every one of you just did what you could without worrying about whether or not you would succeed, that would be enough.
And remember, these politicians don't have any real power. They just have your obedience. Even their enforcement arms, the police and the military, are really just structured obedience.
Withdraw that obedience and it's game over.
To download the files mentioned in this video click here (French direct download), (English direct download), (French torrent)
Comment: SCG is right about where this is all heading. But it's even worse than that. Humanity is on the straight path to another Holocaust. The Paris attacks were the equivalent of the Reichstag fire. Things will only escalate as Europe descends further into racist bloodlust.
However, regarding his previous video, mentioned in the video above, we do not think it is the 'smoking gun' so many conspiracists are looking for. As Jonathan Cook put it recently, it only proves one thing: that the media/authorities lied about the nature of Merabet's death - that he was shot in the head, when in fact he was not:
It seems - though I suppose there could be an explanation I have overlooked - that the authorities have lied about the cause of the policeman's death. That could be for several probably unknowable reasons, including that his being executed was a simpler, neater story than that he bled to death on the pavement because of official incompetence (there already seems to have been plenty of that in this case).Watching the video, it's possible he was shot in the back, which would explain the lack of obvious head wounds.
The second point is even more troubling. Most of the senior editors of our mainstream media have watched the unedited video just as you now have. And either not one of them saw the problem raised here - that the video does not show what it is supposed to show - or some of them did see it but did not care. Either way, they simply regurgitated an official story that does not seem to fit the available evidence.
Reader Comments
French president says on national TV that the Illuminati is attacking Paris.
[Link]
Published on Jan 10, 2015
Please check out the BELOW links proving that "Illuminé" and "Illuminati" mean the SAME:
Le Forestier René - Les illuminés de Bavière et la Franc-Maçonnerie allemande
[Link]
ILLUMINÉS DE BAVIÈRE
[Link]
Illuminés de Bavière
[Link]
(Whereas "BNF" stands for "Biblioteque Nationale de France", France National Library)
[Link]
I'm not sure why this sentiment is so prevalent ... I thought it was 9/11 that was the equivalent to the Reichstag fire, and as such we are a lot further down the line
The Reichstag fire was the enabler for the Nazis to come to power - in America 9/11 was used to implement COG which has not been de-activated since
The Paris event was an event to implement further agenda changes by those already in power ... a mass event orchestrated to allow the sheeple to share their grievances (against Muslims) ... as such maybe KrisstalNacht is a better candidate
charlie |ˈtʃɑːli|
noun (pl.charlies)
1 Brit. informal a fool. what a bunch of charlies.
They really must be laughing at all those self-confessed fools. You have to hand it to them, getting millions of people to run around with signs and t-shirts saying I am charlie.
of alternative media that the most-viewed 'truth' about the Paris attack was untrue.
I'm currently facing trial for insulting a civil servant here. The maximum term for which is six years prison.
I also "balance sur le resaux sociaux", I read and participate in the alternative side of the internet.
I'm trying desperately hard to convince my wife that we need to get our children out of school, i know that the schools here are just obedient citizen factories; but even that mention of "needing to repair the schoolchildren who didn't observe the minutes silence" chilled me.
Anyone know a good lawyer?
No, no, no, you got it wrong. It would be murder if those were Islamic drones. It doesn't matter how it's done. What matters is who does it. It's not murder if it's done by the US and its allies, because they are always right, and "God" (whoever the fuck that is) is on their side.
But the main point is clear. As with 9/11 and all similar events, while we may not know what exactly happened, the one thing that's very clear and should be the starting point of any further analysis is that the governments and media are lying. That we know for sure.
The media didn't "lie" about Merabet's death. They simply watched the video and ran with the idea that he was killed with a shot to the head immediately after the attacks, since that is what it looked like initially. It wasn't important to the mainstream media that, on closer analysis of the video, Merabet probably wasn't shot in the head, because they are not "conspiracy theorists".
The BS around Merabet is a great example of idiocy and fecklessness amongst "alternative media" pundits who, in theory, should know better. In fact, it's completely irresponsible and dishonest of such people to throw subjective BS out there without careful consideration.Such people approach such events with a pre-established belief that it is a conspiracy and then go looking for any evidence to back up their belief.
This is a completely WRONG way to approach such an event, assuming you are interested in the truth. A proper scientific mindset approach should be always be taken, and everything looked at as if it were 'normal'. Whatever stands out AFTER such an approach is taken can then be looked at in more detail and potentially placed in an historical context of 'false flag' operations.
I spoke to a couple of French mates recently about that speech and asked them what he meant to say. The best we could come up with was "visionary"
Illuminated is illuminated whichever language you read:
[Link]
[Link]
The best definition I have found is here:
[Link]
Mr Hollande knows what he said and I'm sure he chose his words very carefully. He knows that this was an attack against his recent moves to befriend Russia.
Of course, I could be wrong. If I am, I would welcome any other reference for linking to fanatic
@La Resistance:
Welcome to Sott (if you are new here). Very sorry to hear of your current troubles.
Joe leans just a little bit heavy on applied science. Sometimes, applied science can be mis-applied.
'There's more to the camera than meets the eye.'
ned
The cunning utterly remorseless life-destroying psycho is an abomination.
However, it is the billions of human 'half-breeds', humans who have actual human characteristics--who display remorse, regret, compassion, and various facets of genuine love and attraction to good--but who are under the watchful and total control (through politicking, cultural themes, science and invention, and so on) of the remorseless psychos that then supply the human characteristics necessary to maintain the grid or the present matrix of living hell for unspellbound so effectively. Through it all, these 'half-breeds' (three quarter-breeds, etc.) supply the vital human face. As I have indicated before, the half-breeds (actors and Uncle Toms) are rewarded with salary and seemingly important and energetic positions in the chain of command, and this is sufficient for their thorough and obliging, comforting (to them) participation.
The unspellbound have almost no chance at survival in the coming years, unless something extraordinary takes place.
I don't see that happening, though at least at Sott some of the necessary action is occurring. Most important is the disruption of the usual and common business and bureaucratic hierarchies that are so appealing and compelling (and comforting) to these half-breeds. It means nothing if the disruption is merely mechanical; the disruption MUST be conscious.
A word for this 'disruption' would be: A-N-A-R-C-H-Y. But of course again, it must be conscious and it must somehow increase and increase rather quickly, at that....
In the meantime, we will continue to have what-we-have, only it will get W-O-R-S-E.
Good luck.
ned
It has always been controlled, the issue is truthful content.
@SAJ:
I agree with you, on the internet. It has always been controlled and I think it is being more controlled now, though there are places like Sott that may be improving, somewhat.
Truth is often spontaneous.
ned
I stand corrected, I've been using the wrong dictionary, but my French friends have never heard it used in that sense. Typical of the French really though, they are good at using the same word for opposite meanings. I guess it's all in the delivery.
thanks for your thoughts ned. Still trying to sort the fact from fiction after over eight years reading here, what was it I heard recently..... oh yes, the problem with fiction, it has to be believable!






that part of the method of a false flag attack is to put out false, absurd and/or contradictory news. It's part of the distraction while the politicians move quickly on with their charade. Those who would notice such things are kept going in circles, over-chewing every morsel. Very clever neutralizing device that keeps the public hamstrung. All goes to show that the puppet masters have their moves down to a science. They only have to merely appear stupid while firmly committed to their agenda -- a global controlling venture.