
© Brentcherry
Identity politics is stupid. It divides humans into various arbitrary "identity groups" and then stops there. All analysis and understanding go no further than the level of the group. But what is identity? It comes from the Latin
idem, meaning "the same, in the sense of repeating over and over". In other words, identity implies something about you that carries over from one instant to the next, making you
you. Of course, things like your sex, skin color, and orientation do that. Contrary to popular opinion, you can't just decide you're a lesbian Mexican grandmother. But the idea that any or all of those things define you completely is absurd.
Identity politics makes all members of a group, Blacks for example, identical. If that sounds racist, it's because it is.
No, identity is more than what biological category you happen to have been born in. It's who
you are - singular. The only true
identity politics would have to go down to the level of the individual, because no matter how similar two people are, they are never identical. Another definition for identity comes from information technology: "an object that represents a user".
[1] This is a good analogy - at least it approaches the level of the individual. But even individuals can change. Given sufficient stress, a person's personality can become
warped. Identity should be something more permanent.
Most of the time, we operate in the world based on 'rules' or habits accumulated throughout our lives, shaped from conception by our genes and socialization. Our gift of higher reasoning allows us some measure of control over these habits - to monitor, and if necessary, inhibit the aggressive or fearful knee-jerk responses in order to provide for conscious control during situations to which our personalities may be unadapted -
for instance, a severe change in the conditions of our external environment.
Comment: