Today on MindMatters, we look at the Czech "Dictionary of Totalitarianism", a project by several Czech academics analyzing the vocabulary of propaganda during the socialist period in Czechoslovakia. Using statistical analysis, the researchers were able to identify which words came into prominence and attached with that suggestive, emotional flavor typical of totalitarians and pathocrats, the euphemisms and stereotyped phrases, and the slurs used to demonize political enemies. We also look at a more modern text of revolutionary and potentially totalitarian ideology, The Anti-Fascist Handbook.
Running Time: 01:06:53
Download: MP3 — 61.2 MB
On the Dictionary of Totalitarianism:
Harrison Koehli co-hosts SOTT Radio Network's MindMatters, and is an editor for Red Pill Press. He has been interviewed on several North American radio shows about his writings on the study of ponerology. In addition to music and books, Harrison enjoys tobacco and bacon (often at the same time) and dislikes cell phones, vegetables, and fascists (commies too).
Corey Schink was born and raised in the Midwestern United States, where he worked on farms and as a welder, musician, and social worker. His interests in government, philosophy and history led to his writing for SOTT in 2012 and to becoming a SOTT editor and SOTT Radio co-host in 2014. He now resides in North Carolina, where he enjoys the magnificent views of the Appalachian Mountains.
Reader Comments
We can wonder why propaganda is discussed in the paradigm of Eastern Europe/Russia,Because you can learn something from history. And this conversation is part of a wider discussion of Political Ponerology, which was directly inspired by experience "in the paradigm of Eastern Europe/Russia".
with a dishonest (propagandistic) link to socialism!,History lesson: they called themselves socialists. And if you listen to the previous show, of which this was a continuation, you'll see that we distinguish between socialist ideology and pathocracy. The propaganda discussed isn't a direct result of socialism - it's a product of pathocracy. Socialism was just the mask used in that time and place. That's not to say socialism as an economic system doesn't have its own problems, of course. It does, but the type of propaganda we discuss isn't necessarily one of them.
when the West, especially the U.S., has long since become world master of this evil art, possibly exemplified by this presentation.Agreed (except for that last bit). But we weren't discussing American propaganda. We were discussing socialist-era Czech propaganda. Again, you can learn something from history.
No !! It's not ! It's in the paradigm of that psycho-reptilian Leia Davidovich Trotsky (Bronstein)
"We have to transform Russia into a desert populated with white niggers, to whom we shall give such a tyranny, that even the worst despots of the East have never even dreamed of ... "This tyranny will not be from the right, but from the left, not white, but red. "In the literal sense of the word red, as we shall shed such rivers of blood, before which shall shudder and pale all the human losses of the capitalist wars ... "By means of terror and blood baths, we will bring the Russian intelligentsia to complete stupor, to idiocy, until the animalistic condition ... "our boys in leather jackets ... know how to hate everything Russian! "What a great pleasure for them to physically destroy the Russian intelligentsia - military officers, academics, writers"
The antifa handbook is a copy of the above ...
Some can SAY anything; e.g., 'Your mother wears army boots', but that don't make it so.
A quick way to determine 'controlled opposition' is the uniform presentations of "We've Found OUT The Truth"; and we'll have no more questioning of it, a la , the HolyCo$t, (TM), et al. By that, or any other reasonable standard, that's a patently BS statement.
R.C.
R.C..







I read an opinion somewhere that SOTT is associated with the CIA which I find unlikely, but everything must be questioned these days, for sure. Given the on-going crises in our contemporary world, why would someone bring up the Western 1950s propagandistic blather against 'communism' and 'socialism' (and ANTIFA - did they find no way to fit in other-sexed/gendered, Darwinists, and atheists?) unless it's a joke, using propaganda to criticize propaganda. I am wary, and weary, of rabbit holes.