The latest suggestion there is that Iran may dilute its highly enriched uranium stockpile rather than destroying or handing it over, which would...
Clearly, preservation of history is not what Israel is after. Which is ironic, if their goal was true.
This phase of the Iranian conflict likely will only end when the West falls off the approaching economic cliff ... And, watching the prices of...
To all my friends at SOTT... do keep in touch! [Link] LOL
I don't think turkey would have any trouble or worry about securing a nuke if they needed. israel has to get through Iran first and I don't think...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Reader Comments
When you kill something that is alive, make sure that you kill it completely.
Otherwise, it might come back to haunt you; so do a good job and make it thorough, eg., use a heavy, very powerful and mighty machine.
But wouldn't you know it?
It is very difficult to kill something completely. After all, it was alive for a reason.
It might even be impossible.
And so it very likely will come back to haunt you.
Life is like that, it goes on forever.
Don't you know?
An alternative to killing would be recognizing, developing and using your intuition, which is your connection to life.
But this is not something that is popular in these days of hgh efficiency and technology and the building of mighty machines.
Perhaps it has been killed?
DUH.
ned,
out
As usual, what is 'ned' talking about? What a jerk.
1a) NEVER HIT A CHILD.
1b) NEVER ALLOW A CHILD TO HIT.
Work to establish authoritarian rule, a totalitarian government, that ensures that these two things never happen.
Who needs intuition?
What the hell is that?
Define it.
Categorize it.
Legalize it.
Standardize it, license it, sell it and promote it. Make a profit.
Get rich.
OTHERWISE, STFU.
Duh.
Just goes to show them that "might means right". Wanna raise a bully? Hit him; he will follow your example. It is possible to maim a child for life with just one blow to the head. I was raised in Catholic schools, and it was all about punishment. Violence breeds violence and accomplishes little else. They will get no alumni donation from me. The bible is a tool of the negatives, it directs you from your own soul to authoritarian rule. A great deal of it is pure fiction, designed to hoodwink people into blind subservience.
I t's a fine balance. You can over-think these things. Over-legislate these things.
Psychological cruelty, or 'being mean' is part of the same bag.
There's a fine balance between parental guidance and manipulation.
Teaching children that all violence is wrong, and that they shouldn't fight back when pushed around at school is a form of psychologically cruelty.
Childhood should have enough 'air' in it for children to find out for themselves the do's don't's of these kinds of things.
The day I whacked the school psychocrat was most instructive.
Never had a fight. Never fell off the roof of a derelict house. Never had a bloody nose. Never had stitches. Never had anyone say anything remotely mean to you. What kind of childhood is that? And what can be learned from a childhood like that? Ask a snowflake, I guess.