British political magazine, 19th century: 'Running amuck' - the perennial 'Russian savage and threat to global order and peace'. Why do the Brits hate Russia so?
Ministers were worried over "the confused state of British public opinion (America seen as a great a threat to peace as Russia)" and "a strong strain of anti-Reagan and anti-American sentiment". They put this down to "Soviet propaganda" and the gullibility of the British public.
© Sputnik/National ArchivesMemo addressed to Margaret Thatcher
A number of memos to Prime Minister Thatcher recommended countering this with support for pro-government groups in the UK as well as expanded radio broadcasts to the Soviet Union and its "satellites" to "project" culture and wean the countries of Eastern and Central Europe off their alliance with Moscow.
But the story of anti-Russian propaganda goes farther back than last century.
'Contempt for the Russian People'
© Open Book Publishers'A People Passing Rude: British Responses to Russian Culture' by Anthony Cross
Anthony Cross, Emeritus Professor at the Department of Slavonic Studies, University of Cambridge is the editor of A People Passing Rude: British Responses to Russian Culture:
"Among the earliest and most influential Elizabethan accounts of Russia were those collected and published by Richard Hakluyt in two editions at the end of the 16th century, but two other publications, appearing before Hakluyt but then included by him in emasculated form, were influential in establishing a largely negative perception of Russia that extended way beyond intense cold and ubiquitous bears to religious obscurantism, tyrannical rule, and almost willful ignorance."Professor Cross took the title for his book from an epistle by the English poet George Turbervile, secretary to Thomas Randolph during his embassy to Muscovy in 1568, who entertained London society with damning depictions of "a people passing rude to vices vile inclin'd."
Comment: Inquiring minds ask: what 'vices', exactly?
In a much more scholarly Of the Russe Commonwealth treatise, another English Ambassador Giles Fletcher (1588-9) described Russians as ignorant and godless.
The famous author of "Paradise Lost" (and "Regained") poet John Milton also had a jab at the Russians. In his Brief History of Muscovia, a compilation of 16th century accounts, published posthumously in 1682, he echoed Fletcher in suggesting that the Russians "have no learning, nor will suffer it to be among them."
Milton claimed his book was based on witness accounts.
But as an American researcher of Muscovia, John B Gleason, observed:
"No one seems to have asked whether the eyewitnesses were truthful, well-informed, conscientious. The Muscovia never raises such questions but uses every kind of assertion indiscriminately."Another expert on the subject, Lloyd E Berry, has identified "two 'thematic' similarities between Giles Fletcher's and Milton's books on Russia: pride in the accomplishments of the English people and [their] system of government and contempt for the Russian people and Russian institutions."
Comment: Fascinating. So the current anti-Russian madness has essentially been the status quo for 400+ years. And the given reason is essentially the same: 'because we're number one and they suck!'
That of course still doesn't explain why the British (and their descendants and allies) hate the Russians so much, but at least we now know it's an historical and entrenched psycho-sociological phenomenon.
Russian Spies at the Palace
This western contempt for Russia and its people manifested itself during the Crimean War of 1853-56.
Russia had been putting military pressure on the Ottoman Empire in an effort to force political concessions from Turkey, particularly in regard to the governance of Orthodox Christian populations of the Balkan lands under Ottoman rule. Russia expected support from the Christian rulers of Britain, France, Prussia, and Austria, but both Catholics and Protestants of Western Europe viewed Muslim Turks as a lesser evil than Orthodox Russians.
In a Punch parody of an Orthodox Christian icon, the Tsar is seated on cannon balls, with a ramrod as a crozier, a mortar as a mitre, and a halo of bayonets.
That the Balkan peoples who rebelled against the Ottomans saw Russia as their protector and liberator made London, Paris and Vienna worry more about geopolitics than national aspirations of the oppressed.
It was England, particularly the Home Secretary Lord Palmerston, and the British press, led by The Times and the satirical magazine Punch who pushed hardest for the western powers to declare war on Russia. Such was the war fever brought about by the press that rumours abounded about Queen Victoria's husband, Prince Albert, being a Russian agent. Thousands waited by the Tower of London to see Prince Albert escorted into the infamous prison.
The Bear Season
In a reference to Aesop's fable about bees defending their hive from an intruding bear a Punch cartoon shows Turkish, Austrian, Prussian, French, and English 'bees', protecting the 'hives' of Constantinople, the capital of the Ottoman Empire, against the angry Russian 'bear'.
© Alamy'The bear and the bees'
The Punch, established in 1841, made this allegory a household item. From then on the fearsome beast has been invoked each time the West wanted to depict Russia as a savage country.
Even the infamously bungled 'Charge of the Light Brigade' at the Battle of Balaclava was used by The Times to belittle the Russians as compared to the English:
"If the exhibition of the most brilliant valor, of the excess of courage, and of a daring which would have reflected luster on the best days of chivalry can afford full consolation for the disaster of today, we can have no reason to regret the melancholy loss which we sustained in a contest with a savage and barbarian enemy."The British were equally disdainful towards their Turkish allies whom London purported to "save" from the Russian "bear."
Varying Degrees of Ignorance
In 1921, after the end of the Russian Civil War and military intervention by Britain, the United States and a dozen other western countries, a group of American journalists went to Moscow. Their task was to report on the changes happening in Soviet Russia. The Soviet government lent them rooms at the Savoy Hotel free of charge. Much later, in a book by an American journalist Whitman Basso, 'The Moscow Correspondents: Reporting on Russia from the Revolution to Glasnost', they reminisced about the challenges they faced.
They admitted they did not know the language, the history, the politics, or very much about the men who shaped the momentous events. Among the inhabitants of the Savoy Hotel there were no Soviet experts, nor even, as British journalist Paul Winterton later put it, people with "varying degrees of ignorance." What little they knew about Soviet Russia they probably learned from their own newspapers.
'Moscow's Orders to Our Reds'
British journalists appeared to be a lot more knowledgeable than their American colleagues at the time but many used their knowledge of Russia in a peculiar way.
Comment: ...as could be said about them in general: they use their knowledge in a peculiar way.
In 1924, the Daily Mail published a forgery that threw Anglo-Russian relations off-course for a long time. The Daily Mail made the most of a fake letter allegedly written by the head of Comintern Zinoviev to the British Communists, calling it "Moscow's orders to our Reds." Following the publication of the forged letter, London reversed its decision taken earlier that year to recognize Soviet Russia and cancelled a treaty with Moscow that was meant to move East-West relations from confrontation to cooperation.
It could be argued that it was this letter and not Churchill's Fulton speech 22 years later that laid the foundations of the Cold War. It is not widely known that Churchill borrowed his famous — or infamous — reference to the 'Iron Curtain' from no other than the ace of Nazi propaganda, Goebbels, who had used the metaphor to justify war on communism.
The relay was swiftly picked up by the American press. "Every Communist is Moscow's Spy" was the battle cry of Senator McCarthy's 'Un-American Activities Committee' in the 1950s.
Even Hollywood wartime films about the anti-Nazi alliance with Moscow, commissioned by the White House, were declared pro-Soviet propaganda. The Russian bear leaped from the British onto the American pages. In time for the Olympic Games in Moscow, the top-selling Reader's Digest magazine called on the Americans to "Stand Up to the Russian Bear."
The US athletes boycotted the Games, but the rest of the world saw a different kind of bear — a huggable Olympic mascot Misha The Bear who shed a tear of sorrow at the Moscow Olympiad's closing ceremony.
Photo of the Olympic Games' mascot Misha-bear, 19 July 1980 in Lenin Stadium Moscow, wishing everyone good luck at the opening ceremony of the 1980 Olympic Games, hosted by the USSR
Summing it up in 2014, Roger Cockrell wrote in the Slavonic and East European Review:
"Time and again we are reminded of the ambiguities in British attitudes towards Russia and Russian culture, covering the spectrum from extravagant praise to profound distrust, and embracing purely negative traits such as ignorance, fear, stereotyping and condescension. How many would argue that such reactions and attitudes belong simply to the past?"Two years on such attitudes are stronger than ever...
Governments hate, because as a kind of 'official' mob, they have to follow a common 'official' line., otherwise there would be chaos, not government.
Mobs hate, because mobs on the whole are stupid, rather like an ant's nest with no central control, no queen to guide them.