© Natalia Kirichenko, Shutterstock A newborn baby in a pink hat and mittens.
Even 2-day-old babies know that some syllables just sound better than others, according to a new study.
Across world languages, certain syllables are more commonly used than others. But why this linguistic preference exists has been a matter of scientific debate. While some researchers have suggested that the preference results from the historical processes that shape languages, or the ease of pronunciation, others hold it may be innate, with the human brain being partial to certain sounds.
Now, the new study suggests that people are indeed born with a preference for some
sounds over others.
"We believe that many things are learned, for instance, the
vocabulary," said study author David Maximiliano Gómez, a language and cognition researcher at the University of Chile. But there are other aspects of language, such as the syllables people use, that might be innate, he said.
The study, published March 31 in the journal
PNAS, shows that babies react to certain syllables very similarly to the way adults do, Gómez told Live Science.
The study was conducted on three groups of 24 Italian babies, ages 2 to 5 days. The children in the study listened to a few kinds of syllables, including "lbif" and "bdif," which are generally less popular among adults, and "blif" and "oblif," which adults more commonly prefer.
Comment: Ignore Ronson and Fallon's 'insights'; they're muddying the issue, intentionally or not.
Most psychopaths are very difficult to spot, so there's no point in trying. Instead try to learn all you can about them. Besides Hare and Babiak's work as a good introduction to the topic, there is also Dr. Martha Stout's work.
While it's tempting to seek a silver lining about this bleak revelation that psychopathy has reached pandemic levels, we would caution against thinking that because they're CEOs, doctors, lawyers and soldiers, they're successful and therefore 'good'.
What if the war those soldiers are waging is illegal (brought about by high-level psychopaths - Blair & Bush, anyone?) - is their 'service' still 'good'? What if the 'work' those CEOs produce is destroying a country's economy, draining people's wealth and leading to massive bonuses for a few while starving the rest?
'Successful' when applied to psychopaths doesn't mean they're productive members of society; it means they've successfully hidden their alien condition, which is all the better for preying on unaware people. When you get down to it, the world has only one root problem from which all else stems: psychopaths.