Puppet MastersS


Chess

The coup against Dilma Rousseff is disastrous for Brazil

El impeachment' a Dilma Roussef, más cerca que nunca
© Ueslei Marcelino-Reuters
Rousseff is the victim of a highly corrupt and dysfunctional political system, which is specious reasons to remove from office one of the few politicians who is not corrupt. Given Brazil's recent history of political violence and instability it is a reckless and dangerous step which can only increase cynicism and instability and make instability greater.

Though it is attracting remarkably little notice around the world, Brazil is quietly completing the process of replacing its democratically elected President with an appointed one. Dilma Rousseff, elected President of Brazil in 2010 and re-elected in October 2014 with 51.6% of the vote in the election's second round, was suspended from her elected office in April 2016 by votes in the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies and in the Senate. She is now undergoing trial for impeachment before the Senate.

By general consensus Rousseff was a less than successful President of Brazil. She has herself admitted mistakes. She never asserted her authority effectively and proved to be a less than competent and at times erratic manager of the Brazilian economy. She completely lacked the charisma and authority of her predecessor, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who chose her as his successor, and whose shadow she never fully escaped

The single factor that probably eroded Rousseff's support more than any other was Brazil's fall into recession soon after her re-election in 2014. Coming after a decade of rapid growth and rising living standards, this came as a shock for many Brazilians, and lost her support within her working class electoral base.

Whilst a strong case can be made that Rousseff handled the recession badly, it is important to say that she did not cause it. As a major commodities exporter Brazil was inevitably hit hard by the collapse in oil and commodity prices which began in mid 2014. That would have inevitably caused a recession in Brazil whoever was President.

Comment: The collapse of the oil and commodities markets wasn't just happenstance, nor has it only affected Brazil. This was part and parcel of the U.S. waged economic war fought against Russia, and Brazil being a BRICS partner has suffered in no small part because it wants something other than a world dominated by U.S. hegemony. The impeachment proceedings against Rousseff is unconstitutional and fueled by corrupt powers who do not have Brazil's best interest at heart.

See also:

'Impeachment equal to political death penalty'
"I am asking you to vote against the impeachment. Vote for democracy," Brazil's suspended president told Federal senators, before they started their questioning session, expected to last all day Monday.

Saying that accusations against her are unfair, and that she hasn't committed any crime against the budget, Rousseff said, "my conscience is clean. Depriving me of my [presidential] mandate is equal to a political death penalty."

In her emotional speech, she added that she had feared death only two times in her life before - when she was tortured, and when she had cancer. "Now I am fearing the death of democracy," she said.

"We are here to defend what we believe in - democracy and justice," a protester told RT. Another of Rousseff's supporters called for people's resistance to those senators who want her deprived of power, saying it's not right that "54 senators can remove a president who is elected by 54 million people."



Gold Coins

Saudi Arabia continues to burn through foreign reserves to cover budget deficit, Yemen war costs

money foreign currency reserves
© Fahad Shadeed / Reuters
Riyadh's foreign reserves dropped to $555 billion, down $6 billion in July, as low oil prices continue to eat up the country's assets abroad.

Saudi Arabia's foreign holdings are 16 percent down on the same month in 2015 and are at their lowest level since February 2012. The holdings peaked in August 2014 at $737 billion falling with oil prices.

The assets are likely to consist of US dollars, securities like US Treasury bonds and deposits with banks abroad. The deposits reduced by $8 billion to $125 billion in July, but holdings in foreign securities grew by $2 billion to $371 billion after 10 straight months of contraction.

Comment: The Saudis have attempted to force their competitors from the oil game by driving prices down to the point where even they can barely make any money. At the same time they are waging what is proving to be an unwinnable war in Yemen where their only strategy is to throw money at it, in the form of ever-larger arms purchases (of which the US defense industry is the principle benefactor) and hiring mercenary armies, as their own military is a joke. Between these two ludicrous decisions, the House of Saud may very well have doomed itself.


Info

South China Sea tensions: US, India sign major military pact amid Chinese concerns

US aircraft carrier
© Mike Blake / Reuters
The US and India have signed a major military deal facilitating the bilateral use of navy bases, allowing Washington to boost its military presence on China's doorstep.

The signing of the Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (LEMOA), which has been in preparation for over a decade, is one of the highlights of Indian Defense Minister Manohar Parrikar's three-day visit to Washington.

During a joint press conference following the document's signing, US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter praised the agreement, saying it would aid the "overall maritime security" and contribute to "freedom of navigation" across the world.


Comment: In other words, US has more options to project its power.


Boat

UK sends destroyer to fight ISIS in Persian Gulf despite its previous warm water failures

HMS Daring
© Luke MacGregor / Reuters
The Royal Navy is sending its lead Daring-class air defense destroyer, the HMS Daring, to the Persian Gulf to help the US-led coalition fight terrorists in the region, but there have been concerns over the warship's technical reliability in warmer climes.

Tasked with protecting US aircraft carriers as they launch airstrikes on Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) targets in Syria and Iraq, the £1 billion ($1.3 billion) Type 45 warship might be prone to something completely different than the jihadists and their weapons.

The destroyers have previously had technical issues in warm waters, the Royal Navy has admitted, and the HMS Daring has had two such technical failures.

Snakes in Suits

Julian Assange exposes Hillary Clinton's 'Libya Tick Tock' email: A step-by-step guide to destroy Libya

Clinton in Libya
The Clinton teams' "brag sheet" of all the actions that Hillary took credit for as the architect of the US involvement in Libya.

Last week in an interview with Fox and friends, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange made a bold statement.

When asked what surprised him the most about Hillary Clinton's thousands of emails, Assange said the "most interesting and serious" information on Hillary Clinton is yet to be released.

Assange then proceeded to nudge viewers towards the direction of an already released email thread call the "Libya Tick Tock"...a stream of emails which clearly certifies Hillary's lead position in the Libyan disaster.

Attention

Russia needs to stay alert: Washington is preparing for war

Paul Craig Roberts
Well, it is possible that Washington's elite forces will argue over the rapprochement between Turkey and Russia. They will argue like: "Look! Our focus is on the Kremlin. We have to strike the Russians now, while we still have some strength".

There will be neoconservatives, who will make that argument. On the other hand, many people, not just in Washington but in Europe, will realize that with the weakening of the alliance it is even more risky to strike Russia. And various European governments will say: "Why do we want to be at risk for the sake of the Americans? If the Americans want to have power all over the world, why should we be drawn into war with Russia which could be catastrophic for us? We don't see the benefit".

So, it's entirely possible, that the exit from the EU and exit from NATO would break up the ability of Washington to exercise its aggressive policies. Then they may simply have to accept the presence of other strong countries that are Russia and China. It may force Washington into a more reasonable stand.

I can't predict which argument will win. I think if this kind of argument will materialize when Hillary Clinton is President, there will be a bigger danger of Russia being attacked. Because she is a warmonger. The last chance is on the other candidate. So, it remains to be seen.

The Russians need to stay very attentive. They must know by now that they cannot trust Washington. You can't believe anything that Washington says. American people can't believe them either.

Info

Obama to meet Erdogan over Syria crisis at G20 summit

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan (R) receives US President Barack Obama
© AFP
US President Barack Obama is set to meet his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdogan to discuss a range of issues including the Syria crisis, a senior US official announces.

The two presidents will meet on the sidelines of the Group of 20 summit in China on Sunday, said Ben Rhodes, the deputy US national security adviser.

"They will be discussing the counter-ISIL (Daesh) campaign and the fact that we need to stay united," Rhodes told reporters in Washington, DC, on Monday.

Comment: Did Biden not do a good job? Turkish tanks cross Syrian border in military op to retake city of Jarablus from ISIS with US air support - UPDATES


Snakes in Suits

The truth hurts: Thanks to the EU's bungling, Russia will inevitably win in Ukraine

Russian buildings in East Ukraine
Eastern Ukraine speaks Russia, and will become Russian again.
Can there have been any great international drama in which Western politicians have more completely stood reality on its head than the unending crisis over Ukraine, which is yet again creeping back into the headlines?

There was only ever one reason why the tragedy tearing Ukraine apart first erupted as it did in the winter of 2013/14: the hubristic itch of the EU, backed by the United States, to absorb Ukraine into its own ever-enlarging empire.

For this, the West was happy to see an elected pro-Russian Ukrainian president ousted in a coup d'état by an unelected stooge favourable to the EU. It was wholly predictable that the Russian-speakers of Crimea and eastern Ukraine would prefer to be ruled by their fellow Russians in Moscow, rather than by some weird form of government in faraway Brussels that they didn't begin to understand.

Dollars

Clinton Foundation donors given special treatment while Hillary was secretary of state

Clinton Foundation plaque
© Lucy Nicholson / Reuters
Newly released emails reveal more ties between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department during Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state, showing that major donors received special perks - including lunch with the Chinese president.

The State Department emails were released as part of a public records lawsuit by conservative group Citizens United. The documents were then shared exclusively with ABC News.

"After more than two years of Freedom of Information Act requests and lengthy litigation, the truth is finally coming out," David Bossie, president of Citizens United, said in a statement. "Hillary Clinton's senior staff at the State Department routinely worked with the Clinton Foundation to reward big donors with special access and favors for four years."

Comment: More articles on the Clinton Foundation:


Propaganda

NYT becomes its own parody: Laments 'false Russian news stories' by running a patently false news story

New York Times
© AFP 2016/ Emmanuel Dunand
The New York Times is desperate for new readers and therefore tries to branch into the realm of The Onion and other satirical sites. It attempts to show that allegedly Russia-controlled media spread false stories for political purpose - by providing a false media story. The purpose of the NYT doing such is yours to guess.

The sourcing of that Page 1 story is as weak as its content. It starts with claiming that opponents of Sweden joining NATO must be somehow Russia related and are spreading false stories:
As often happens in such cases, Swedish officials were never able to pin down the source of the false reports.
Duh! But it must have been Russia. Because Swedish internal opposition to joining NATO would be incapable of opining against it. Right? Likewise anti-EU reports and opposition to the EU within the Czech Republic MUST be caused by Russian disinformation and can in no way be related to mismanagement of the EU project itself.