Puppet MastersS


Stormtrooper

Belgian counter-terrorism raid leaves two dead

Image

Comment: Expect more of these operations in Europe in the next few weeks and months. In most cases, these kinds of operations are centered on going after groups whom the authorities were already well aware of. The reason for the raids is to appease the public that "something is being done" in the wake of the Paris attacks and to keep people afraid and willing to accept draconian surveillance laws.


At least two people were killed when Belgian counter-terrorist police raided an apartment used by suspected Islamist radicals on Thursday, local media said, describing a coordinated, national operation related to last week's attacks in Paris.

Judiciary officials confirmed only that a counter-terrorism operation took place near the centre of Verviers, a town in the east of the country between the city of Liege and the German border. They plan a news briefing at 8 p.m. (2.00 p.m. EST).

Public radio RTBF, which reported a number of other police actions in and around Brussels, said there were no casualties among the security forces. Two unidentified people were killed and a third seriously wounded. Several others were detained.

Earlier, prosecutors said they had detained a man in Belgium whom they suspected of supplying weaponry to Amedy Coulibaly, killer of four people at a Paris Jewish grocery last week.

In a report that could not be immediately confirmed, the Web site of La Meuse newspaper quoted an unidentified police officer saying: "We've averted a Belgian Charlie Hebdo."


Comment: That's always a nice claim to make, it makes for a good quote in the papers. It's quite convenient for the authorities to say that after they've completed their raids and without anything actually happening that would prove that to be true. It seems more than anything that this was done to keep the fear of the public high that there are still "Muslim radicals" operating in Europe so as to keep justifying the encroaching surveillance and security laws that are being touted around the EU as the way to solve the "terrorist problem".


Quenelle

France arrests 54 people for exercising free speech just days after free speech rally

Image
© (Photo: Alexandre Hervaud/cc/flickr)Anti-Elite and anti-Zionist Dieudonné, arrested Wednesday morning for a Facebook post.
In the wake of the Charlie Hebdo massacre last week and just days since the historic Paris unity rally when world leaders stood shoulder-to-shoulder and declared their support for freedom of speech, French authorities have arrested 54 people on charges of "glorifying" or "defending" terrorism.

The French Justice Ministry said that of those arrested, four are minors and several had already been convicted under special measures for immediate sentencing, AP reports. Individuals charged with "inciting terrorism" face a possible 5-year prison term, or up to 7 years for inciting terrorism online. None of those arrested have been linked to the attacks.

Comment: One would think that this level of hypocrisy is enough to make even the most ardent authoritarian follower wake up. However, history shows it not to be the case.

We can only hope that at such a late stage in the game, the insane machinations of the Western elite have become transparent enough for the average person to figure it out, if they choose to do so. We should not give up on spreading the light of truth in any way we can (without being locked up). And be sure to check out Sebastian Haffner's excellent book, Defying Hitler.

hope soap



Magnify

The missing comparisons between the Paris shootings and the Boston bombings

Image
© Agence France-Presse
Yesterday, in response to the horrific events in Paris, a columnist for the Boston Globe, Kevin Cullen, wrote a column drawing a parallel between that monstrous attack and the different but no less abominable violence unleashed in his own city on April 15, 2013.

By now, many of us have seen the chilling video in which a gunman executes a wounded French police officer lying on the sidewalk, his arms raised in helpless surrender.

The Tsarnaev brothers stand accused of doing essentially the same, sneaking up and shooting a helpless MIT police officer named Sean Collier as he sat in his idling cruiser on the Cambridge campus as the manhunt for the Tsarnaevs gathered pace. The killers wanted Collier's gun but were too stupid to figure out how to unbuckle his holster.

He's right about the parallel, but not necessarily about the lessons to be drawn. While there's little doubt that the French suspects committed the multiple murders in Paris, the same cannot be said at this time about the Tsarnaevs and the killing of Sean Collier. There are real questions about both the identity of the MIT executioners and the purpose of their act. Among the questions: why would the Tsarnaevs have been on that empty campus and have known that a police car was parked between buildings off the street? We've examined those issues at great length here.

**

The Globe columnist is perhaps also wrong in his conclusions. Referring to the publication, Charlie Hebdo, whose ranks were decimated in the Paris attack, he writes:
Nous sommes tous Charlie [We are all Charlie]. That is a major, major problem for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. And there is no change of venue for that.
The really striking similarity, beyond the theme of radical Islam, is this: in both cases, the security state knew the perpetrators well. In Boston, the FBI was in direct contact with and monitoring alleged senior perpetrator Tamerlan Tsarnaev.

Comment: In both cases, the glaring evidence of some kind of intelligence involvement is the biggest link. Governments have long used false flag attacks to justify actions which otherwise would have been untenable due to negative public opinion. For both these events, the U.S. and France have used them to further destroy civil liberties and increase surveillance on the public.


Vader

Victims of terror in Africa mostly ignored, while media rages over attacks in Europe

Abuja attack
© Reuters/Afolabi SotundeBurnt-out cars are seen at the scene of a blast in Abuja, June 25, 2014.
Are African lives worth less than the lives of people elsewhere in the world?

Last week 17 people were killed by terrorists in France. The events were shocking and quite rightly the murders were subject to unequivocal condemnation. At the same time, considerably more people were reported to have been killed by gunmen in Baga, Nigeria, with figures ranging from 150 to over 2,000. But it's the French victims who we focus on, showing our solidarity with them by declaring 'Je suis Charlie', and holding vigils in Trafalgar Square and elsewhere- while the African victims of violence have - certainly until the last day or so - been ignored. Even Nigeria's own President was keener to condemn the Paris attacks than those in his own country. How can this be right? Surely we should be mourning all victims equally?

For a brief period it was fashionable to show concern for the victims of political extremism in Africa. Remember the 'BringBackOurGirls' hash tag when the militant Islamist organization Boko Haram kidnapped schoolgirls in Chibok in Nigeria in 2014? The interest however soon died away.

As the media spotlight was shone elsewhere, Boko Haram continued to make major territorial gains killing thousands in the process. Today, as reported by RT, the group now controls an area of 52,000 square kilometers, the size of Slovakia.


Comment: Nigeria is resource-rich with the largest population and workforce in Africa, but is a poor nation divided along sectarian tribal and religious lines, ruled by a corrupt super-class in collusion with oil giants like BP, Shell, Chevron and others. If Nigeria remains divided, then there will almost certainly be no challenge to Britain, US and the Netherlands oil conquest of the country. To keep it divided, trouble needs to be stirred periodically. See: Boko Haram: U.S AFRICOM'S latest False Flag franchise and Boko Haram: A CIA Covert Operation


But while Islamic State and their territorial advances became front page news in 2014, the gains made by Boko Haram have, like the group's victims, been ignored. Instead the focus is on the very small 'threat' terrorists pose to Europe, a threat which as I explained here our governments are doing their best to 'big up'.

Comment: Western military involvement in Africa is designed to secure western imperialist dominance over their resources. Western countries create the conditions for the deterioration of the societies involved, and use false propaganda about humanitarian assistance, to provide a rationale for military occupation. The media will thus only broadcast terror attacks in Africa when it suits the agenda of the PTB.

U.S. military intervention in Africa: The East African Response Force, a creation of the Pentagon

Sudan: US policies in Middle East and North Africa are "harmful and destructive"


Vader

France's arrest of Dieudonné shows the sham of its free speech celebrations

Image
© Chesnot/Getty Images
Forty-eight hours after hosting a massive march under the banner of free expression, France opened a criminal investigation of a controversial French comedian for a Facebook post he wrote about the Charlie Hebdo attack, and then this morning, arrested him for that post on charges of "defending terrorism." The comedian, Dieudonné (above), previously sought elective office in France on what he called an "anti-Zionist" platform, has had his show banned by numerous government officials in cities throughout France, and has been criminally prosecuted several times before for expressing ideas banned in that country.

The apparently criminal viewpoint he posted on Facebook declared: "Tonight, as far as I'm concerned, I feel like Charlie Coulibaly." Investigators concluded that this was intended to mock the "Je Suis Charlie" slogan and express support for the perpetrator of the Paris supermarket killings (whose last name was "Coulibaly"). Expressing that opinion is evidently a crime in the Republic of Liberté, which prides itself on a line of 20th Century intellectuals - from Sartre and Genet to Foucault and Derrida - whose hallmark was leaving no orthodoxy or convention unmolested, no matter how sacred.

Since that glorious "free speech" march, France has reportedly opened 54 criminal cases for "condoning terrorism." AP reported this morning that "France ordered prosecutors around the country to crack down on hate speech, anti-Semitism and glorifying terrorism."

As pernicious as this arrest and related "crackdown" on some speech obviously is, it provides a critical value: namely, it underscores the utter scam that was this week's celebration of free speech in the west. The day before the Charlie Hebdo attack, I coincidentally documented the multiple cases in the west - including in the U.S. - where Muslims have been prosecuted and even imprisoned for their political speech. Vanishingly few of this week's bold free expression mavens have ever uttered a peep of protest about any of those cases - either before the Charlie Hebdo attack or since. That's because "free speech," in the hands of many westerners, actually means: it is vital that the ideas I like be protected, and the right to offend groups I dislike be cherished; anything else is fair game.

Comment: The French authorities would like nothing else than to keep the illusion that they care about free speech going while doing everything possible to neuter the ability of others to do exactly that, speak freely. What this is really about is eliminating the right of anyone to be pro-Muslim in any public arena. If no one can do that, there will be no one to speak up for the Muslims. How long will it be before it's legal for the French government to arrest and detain Muslims for no reason whatsoever? Then with no one allowed to speak up, where does it end? First it was the Muslims. Who's next after that? It's a slippery slope, and who knows where it will end.


Laptop

Free speech? EU ministers push ISPs to censor web after Paris attacks


Comment: The EU is one of the staunchest and most vocal advocates of free speech on the planet. Right? The following are excerpts from a recent article by Liat Clark of Wired.co.uk.


Charlie Hebdo Kopp Online
© Kopp Online
In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on the offices of satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo and a Jewish supermarket in Paris, EU ministers have issued a joint statement calling for ISPs to help to report and remove extremist material online.

The statement was signed by interior ministers from 11 European countries -- including the UK's Theresa May -- on 11 January, with French ministers and security representatives from the US, Canada and EU in attendance. It called for tighter internet surveillance and border controls.

Boat

French nuclear-powered aircraft carrier ready to fight ISIS in Iraq

jet carrier
© Reuters/Benoit Tessier France's flagship Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier patrols in the Mediterranean, March 26, 2011.
France's Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier is ready to be used to support military operations against Islamic State in Iraq, French President Francois Hollande told military personnel aboard the vessel on Wednesday.

"Thanks to the Charles de Gaulle we will have precious intelligence," the president said in a New Year's address, given as the carrier cruised off France's southern coast in the Mediterranean.

"We may also conduct operations in Iraq, if necessary, with even more intensity and more efficiency. The aircraft carrier will work in close cooperation with coalition forces."

France was the first country to join the U.S.-led coalition in air strikes in Iraq against Islamic State insurgents, who have also taken control of large parts of neighboring Syria during the course of the civil war there. However, it has ruled out striking the group in Syria.

Comment: Look at how the Daily Mail reports on this: French to deploy nuclear-powered aircraft carrier to the Middle East in response to Paris terror attacks. This was not in response to the attacks. It was reported the day before. Which in itself is rather interesting.


Snakes in Suits

U.S. using NGOs to destabilize Central Asia

Image
The United States and their satellites have been using nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) for the preparation and implementation of "color revolutions" in North Africa, the Middle East and the former Soviet countries extensively, which has made numerous headlines across international media. The consequences of such "democratic activity" carried out by Washington can be clearly seen in Libya, Iraq, Ukraine, and in several other countries, where this strategy has led to the creation of uncontrolled chaos.

The tactics of Washington's NGOs can be summed out by a famous quote of retired US Lieutenant Colonel Ralph Peters: "Hollywood is "preparing the battlefield," and burgers precede bullets. The flag follows trade."

As a rule, the target of these "cover activities" carried out by NGOs is the struggle for energy markets, or the fight against political opponents, among which the White House highlights Russia, China and Iran. This much explains the latest developments in Hong Kong. Washington has effectively created a network of NGOs there that promote American interests under the pretext of promoting "democracy", which operate by using social networks for spreading their agenda. This same pattern has been duplicated numerous times across the globe to attempt regime change in countries that the White House perceives as a threat to US dominance.


Comment: What's ridiculous is that overthrowing sovereign governments is about the most undemocratic thing a country can do, yet the U.S. goes around touting itself as the most free country in the world, all the while operating covertly as a mendacious, fascist empire that crushes any real democratic movements around the world.


To sponsor these activities Washington has been allocating billions of dollars annually through the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) - the organization responsible for countless coups around the world along with the CIA, on par with numerous private foundations. It's no coincidence then that in Russia alone there were a total of 650 foreign NGOs back in 2012, that were receiving up to one billion dollars a year, with 20 million handed out by Western diplomatic missions directly.

War Whore

Independent researcher: New info shows CIA behind Paris attacks

Image
© AP PhotoMasked gunman run towards a victim of their gunfire outside the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo's office, in Paris, January 7, 2015.
The new information has almost confirmed that Paris attack was a false flag operation carried out by the CIA, says Soraya Sepahpour Ulrich, an independent researcher and writer based in Irvine, California.

According to The Associated Press, one of the men responsible for last week's terrorist attack that killed 12 people in the French capital claimed to have lived with the Nigerian man behind the failed al-Qaeda "underwear bomb" plot five years ago, Yemeni Journalist and researcher Mohammed al-Kibsi who met Said Kouachi, the alleged Paris attacker, said on Monday.

In a phone interview with Press TV on Tuesday, Ulrich said, "The whole Paris incident has been a puzzle for many... and one has to find connections to find what really is going on."

"We have been told by the mainstream media, the Western media, that a Yemeni reporter has claimed that he had interviewed Kouachi who was responsible for the Paris attack, or one of those who were responsible," she said.

"And he had ties with 'the underwear bomber', 'the underwear bomber' who was held responsible for wanting to blow up an airliner at Christmas in 2009," Ulrich added.

Comment: See also:


Propaganda

Charlie Hebdo - mainstream media fails again

charlie hebdo political leaders
© Reuters/Philippe WojazerMr Hollande "Remember everyone - look like you really are upset." March of the Hypocrites. The solidarity march (Marche Republicaine) in the streets of Paris January 11, 2015.
A core tenet of journalism is answering the question "why." It's the media's duty to explain "why" an event happened so that readers will actually understand what they're reading. Leave out the "why" and then assumptions and stereotypes fill in the blank, always readily supplied by politicians whose ridiculous answers are left unquestioned by the corporate media.

Because the real "why" was unexplained in the Charlie Hebdo massacre, an obviously false culprit was created, leading to a moronic national discussion in the U.S. media about whether Islam was "inherently" violent.

For the media to even pose this question either betrays a blinding ignorance about the Middle East and Islam, or a conscious willingness to manipulate public sentiment by only interviewing so-called experts who believe such nonsense.

Media outlets should know that until the 1980's Islamic fundamentalism was virtually inaudible in the Middle East - outside of the U.S.-supported dictatorship of Saudi Arabia, whose ruling monarchy survives thanks to U.S. support. The official religion of Saudi Arabia is a uniquely fundamentalist version of Islam, which along with the royal family are the two anchors of Saudi government power.

Before the 1980's, the dominant ideology in the Middle East was pan-Arab socialism, a secular ideology that viewed Islamic fundamentalism as socially and economically regressive. Islamic fundamentalists engaged in terrorist attacks against the "pan-Arab socialist" governments of Egypt, Syria, Libya, Iraq and other governments that aligned themselves with this ideology at various times.

Comment: One need only browse through the political cartoons of 1930s Germany to see the parallels. We all know how that turned out. Sebastion Haffner's Defying Hitler, A Memoir, a chilling study of the deterioration of pre-WW2 German society, is must read to understand what is happening in French society today.