Puppet MastersS

Handcuffs

Turkish police detain 20 suspected Islamists

turkish police
© REN TV / Tumay Berkin
Turkish police have detained 20 people in the southern city of Adana on suspicion of having links to Islamists, local media said Thursday.

Police raided 22 homes, seizing computers and electronic data storage devices, the Dogan news agency said. A police helicopter was reportedly involved in the operation.

Police rounded up the suspected Islamists and ran medical checks on them before taking the suspects to the Adana security department, where they are being questioned, according to the news outlet.

Comment: Turkey has already allegedly rounded up some of the key military and intelligence assets involved in covert support for the terrorists in Syria (in collusion with NATO). Have they begun mopping up the lower levels of the network within Turkey? See: Not mincing words: Erdogan determined to smash NATO secret army Gladio involved in attempted Turkish coup


Propaganda

Ministry of propaganda: Hillary email leak exposes NYT collusion with U.S. govt war machine

michael gordon
Spineless U.S. govt-puppet presstitute liar Michael Gordon.
A 2010 correspondence found in the WikiLeaks Hillary Clinton Email Archive reveals that Michael R. Gordon of the New York Times met secretly with US State Department officials prior to the newspaper's coverage of WikiLeaks' Iraq War Logs. The correspondence was made public by WikiLeaks' release of emails from a private, unsecured server used by Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton during her time as Secretary of State in the Obama administration.

In view of the Times' long record of parroting the official line of the Pentagon and the intelligence agencies, the revelation that the US government has become the paper's unofficial editor comes hardly as a surprise.

The purpose of Gordon's meeting with officials of the State Department was nothing other than damage control: to warn them of what to expect far enough in advance to adjust their press releases accordingly, while making every assurance that his paper would cherry-pick leaked documents to spin coverage in favor of American foreign policy while burying its most criminal offenses.

Comment: One word: disgusting.


Chess

Russia's long-sighted diplomacy vs US belligerence: The cases of Ukraine and Iran

nato russia
Whilst Russia always seeks dialogue even with declared enemies, the US prefers confrontation.

The recent dismissal of Mikhail Zurabov, Moscow's ambassador to Kiev has raised many important points. One of the more salient points is 'why does Moscow still have representation in a capital whose rulers are openly hostile to Russia'? This is best addressed by contrasting recent Moscow-Kiev relations with those between Iran and the United States since 1979.

Whilst there are countless historical differences, there are some strange political parallels between the Iran Revolution of 1979 and the overthrow of the Ukrainian government in 2014. The differences are more obvious. For most of its long history Persia (later Iran) was an independent kingdom. Even incursions by the Umayyad and later Abbasid Arab Caliphates were not wholly destructive forces, as the Arabs in Persia adopted some Persian customs and often ruled alongside ethnic Persians. The only serious destruction to the sovereignty of Iran came during the 13thcentury Mongol invasions of Persia under Genghis Khan, a destructive period Russians can historically relate to.

By contrast, there has never been a true Ukrainian state until the 20thcentury. The early 20th century Ukrainian States were short lived and were tainted by the shadow of multi-party civil wars. A Ukrainian state as one knows it only came about in 1991 and did so according to the historically arbitrary borders of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, drawn in the 1920s. The history of the region was historically divided between three great powers, the Russian Tsardom, Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and Ottoman Empire. Areas of Eastern and South Eastern Ukraine were effectively Ottoman until the rule of Catherine The Great in the 18th century.

Comment: Further reading: Putin reshuffles the deck: Why Russia chose a new ambassador to Ukraine


Wall Street

Wells Fargo shrugs off Brexit fear, builds new ยฃ300 million London headquarters

More London business district
© Toby Melville / Reuters
American banking giant Wells Fargo says it doesn't see any negative impact on its British business since the country voted to leave the European Union.

"The Brexit vote did not have a material impact on our United Kingdom or other foreign exposure as of June 30, 2016. We will continue to monitor the relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union and assess the related risks," said Wells Fargo in its quarterly report to the US Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday.

"Brexit has added to global economic uncertainty and could result in rates remaining lower for even longer than expected, putting pressure on reinvestment opportunities. However, compared to our large bank peers, it should have a much lower direct impact on our long-term business drivers, because as you know, we're largely a US-centric company and many indicators point to continued relative strength in the US economy," said CEO John Stumpf.


Comment: Sounds like wishful thinking.


Comment: Another bank also sees no worries: Citibank: No significant negative impact in wake of Brexit


Quenelle - Golden

Battle of Aleppo: Russian Air Force is delivering 'killing blows' to jihadis

combattenti jihadisti
Unsuccessful attempts to break siege of rebel fighters trapped in eastern Aleppo result in heavy losses due to bombing by the Russian air force.

Furious battles have been raging around Aleppo as rebel forces led by Jabhat Al-Nusra have repeatedly tried - but have so far failed - to break the encirclement of rebel fighters trapped by the Syrian army in the suburbs of eastern Aleppo.

There is wide discrepancy about the number of rebel fighters involved, with figures given for the number of rebel fighters trapped in eastern Aleppo varying between 5,000 to 10,000, and with the number of rebel fighters involved in the attacks to break the siege put anywhere between 3,500 and 10,000. Though no figure has been given for the number of Syrian and allied troops involved in the fighting, it is doubtful that the Syrian army has a decisive numerical advantage. On the contrary if the higher estimates of the number of rebel fighters are anywhere true then the Syrian and allied forces concentrated in and around Aleppo might even be outnumbered.

This explains the decisive role of the Russian air force. Though the Syrian and allied troops fighting in and around Aleppo are better organised and more heavily armed than the rebels, ultimately they have to rely on bombing by Russian aircraft to make up for their lack of manpower. Russian bombing of rebel positions has in fact been going on round the clock, with rebel sources claiming that the Russian air force carried out no fewer than 40 strikes on their positions just this morning.

Comment: Further reading:
A curious thing in the Western media this weekend is how little coverage is being given to a momentous victory unfolding in Syria. The Syrian Arab Army and Russian forces are about to close the final chapter in the five-year war - and the Western media don't seem to want to know about it.

Russia defeats terrorists while America hails a freak show



Stock Down

Desperation? Bank of England cuts interest rates for first time in seven years, extends QE

Bank of England
© Toby Melville / Reuters
The Bank of England (BoE) has reduced the official base rate from 0.5 percent to 0.25 percent which is a record low, and the first cut since 2009 when it tried to cushion the UK economy from the global financial crisis.

It has also slashed growth forecast for 2017 from the 2.3 percent it was expecting in May to just 0.8 percent. The forecast for 2018 has been cut from 2.3 percent to 1.8 percent. The regulator said it expects the unemployment rate to rise to 5.4 percent next year and 5.6 percent in 2018.

"Following the United Kingdom's vote to leave the European Union, the exchange rate has fallen and the outlook for growth in the short- to medium-term has weakened markedly," the bank said.

Governor Mark Carney said there was scope to cut the interest rate further.

Comment: And as a result of this decision: Rattled investors seek shining path to gold and silver


Info

Forced regime change: Saddam, Gaddafi, Yanukovych, Assad and now Donald Trump

Hussein,Trump,Gaddafi graphic
Washington's penchant for forced regime change abroad is coming home. Calls for Donald Trump to remove himself from the November ballot is akin to the demand a foreign leader must go, having lost the confidence of the Washington Consensus. The inherent anti-democratic nature of this demand is immaterial to the powers-that-be.

It is common knowledge these are gloomy days for the GOP. The party's establishment and donor elite can't come to terms with their nominee Trump. And Trump seems incapable doing himself any favors. He greatest challenge is coming to terms that running a business empire and running for president are entirely different endeavors. Yes, he is running a lousy campaign. Yes, he is too compulsive. And yes, he makes himself an easy target for the liberal corporate media and the ruthless Clinton machine. Indeed, he is the ultimate self-inflicted candidate. Nonetheless, he was fairly elected by his party (unlike the rigged Democratic primary). Though there are voices that "he must go." We have heard this before - many times. And it never works out well. That damn law of unintended consequences always kicks in!

Attention

Ten facts the mainstream media won't tell you about the war in Syria

Machine gun
Corporate media regularly attempts to present Bashar al-Assad's regime in Syria as solely responsible for the ongoing conflict in the region. The media does report on events that contradict this narrative โ€” albeit sparingly โ€” but taken together, these underreported details shine a new light on the conflict.

10: Bashar al-Assad has a higher approval rating than Barack Obama

Despite Obama's claims Assad is illegitimate and must step down, the fact remains that since the conflict erupted in 2011, Assad has held the majority support of his people. The elections in 2014 - which Assad won by a landslide with international observers claiming no violations - is a testament to the fact that although Assad has been accused of serious human rights violations, he continues to remain reasonably popular with the Syrian people.

Obama, on the other hand, won elections in 2012 with a voter turnout of a mere 53.6 percent of the American public; only 129.1 million total were votes cast. This means approximately 189.8 million American people did not vote for Obama. His current approval rating sits at about 50 percent.

Bomb

The Trans-Pacific Partnership and the reason mainstream media is silent about it

Trans Pacific Partnership
After two years with nary a mention from the mainstream press, the corporate windfall otherwise known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) finally earned some, albeit still inadequate, attention.

Considering a New York Times poll from June 2015, which found an alarming 78 percent of respondents had no substantial knowledge of the looming agreement โ€” 30 percent said they hadn't heard or read much about it, while 48 percent had zero knowledge of it whatsoever โ€” the dearth in coverage by mainstream media allowed the TPP to go virtually unnoticed by the public it directly affects.

From August 1, 2013 through January 31, 2015, Media Matters for America tracked how often the TPP earned a mention from the Big Three major cable news outlets: CNN, Fox, and MSNBC. During that lengthy period, CNN and Fox acknowledged the TPP just one time each โ€” and while MSNBC appeared more on the ball, with 73 mentions, the now-canceled The Ed Show was responsible for 71 of those.

While it might seem remiss, if not wholly irresponsible, for such an expansive international trade agreement to escape the mainstream media's attention, the omission wasn't unintentional.

Comment: Further reading:


Display

Another shot fired in the information war against Russia

info war
In recent weeks, fear of 'Russian propaganda', 'disinformation', and 'information warfare' has reached somewhat hysterical proportions, as seen most clearly in the case of alleged links between Russian hackers and US presidential candidate Donald Trump. Yesterday, British information warriors Edward Lucas and Peter Pomerantsev joined in with a report published by the Center for European Policy Analysis entitled Winning the Information War: Techniques and Counter-strategies to Russian Propaganda in Central and Eastern Europe.

The report is pretty much standard Lucas/Pomerantsev fare: Russia, they write, 'regards the post-1989 settlement of Europe as both deplorable and temporary. It sees democracies and open societies as a threat, because they may "infect" Russia with their ideas. It aims to undermine a rules-based multilateral security order in Europe that it regards as unfair and unsustainable.' To this end Russia is using disinformation against the West, 'overtly - through foreign-language television ... and covertly, using notionally independent journalists, experts and commentators'. Moscow's aim, say Lucas and Pomerantsev, is 'not to convince or persuade, but rather to undermine. Instead of agitating audiences into action, it seeks to keep them hooked and distracted, passive and paranoid.'