Free election of masters does not abolish the masters or the slaves." โ Herbert Marcuse
© ReutersAn example of an electronic voting system. This one was used in Virginia in 2010.
The FBI is worried:
foreign hackers have broken into two state election databases.
The
Department of Homeland Security is worried: the nation's voting system needs greater protection against cyberattacks.
I, on the other hand, am not overly worried: after all, the voting booths have already been hacked by a political elite comprised of Republicans and Democrats who are determined to retain power at all costs.The outcome is a foregone conclusion: the police state will win and "we the people" will lose.The damage has already been done.
The DHS, which has offered to help "secure" the nation's elections, has already helped to lock down the nation.
Remember, the DHS is the agency that ushered in the domestic use of surveillance drones, expanded the reach of fusion centers, stockpiled an alarming amount of ammunition, urged Americans to become snitches through a "see something, say something" campaign, oversaw the fumbling antics of TSA agents everywhere, militarized the nation's police, spied on activists and veterans, distributed license plate readers and cell phone trackers to law enforcement agencies, contracted to build detention camps, carried out military drills and lockdowns in American cities, conducted virtual strip searches of airline passengers, established Constitution-free border zones, funded city-wide surveillance cameras, and generally turned our republic into a police state.
So, no, I'm not falling for the government's scare tactics about Russian hackers.I'm not losing a night's sleep over the thought that this election might by any more rigged than it already is.
And I'm not holding my breath in the hopes that the winner of this year's particular popularity contest will save us from government surveillance, weaponized drones, militarized police, endless wars, SWAT team raids, red light cameras, asset forfeiture schemes, overcriminalization, profit-driven private prisons, graft and corruption, or any of the other evils that masquerade as official government business these days.
What I've come to realize is that Americans want to engage in the reassurance ritual of voting.They want to believe that politics matter.
They want to be persuaded that there's a difference between the Republicans and Democrats (
there's not).
They will swear that Barack Obama has been an improvement on George W. Bush (
he has not).
They are convinced that Hillary Clinton's values are different from Donald Trump's (
with both of them, money talks).
Comment: This move by Turkey has been something of an enigma. Judging by the equivocal support/condemnation from the States and the relatively muted response from Syria, Russia and Iran, it looks as if Turkey may well have acted unilaterally, knowing it could get away with it given the leverage they have right now over the U.S., and the desire for better relations coming from Iran and Russia. (A military response against Turkey would escalate things even further.) According to Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Numan Kurtulmus, "All stakeholders have been informed about the start of the 'Euphrates Shield' operations, including Damascus, which was informed by Russia, we are confident." Of course, that doesn't mean they liked it.
Meanwhile, the Turkish-backed militants have 'cleansed' 10 villages from Daesh by now, comprising some 400 kilometers.
See our previous coverage of the Turkish advance in Syria here: Turkish tanks cross Syrian border in military op to retake city of Jarablus from ISIS with US air support - UPDATES