OF THE
TIMES
"The Libyan economy generated some $75 billion of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2010. This economy produced an average annual per capita income of approximately $12,250, which was comparable to the average income in some European countries. Libyan Government revenue greatly exceeded expenditure in the 2000s. This surplus revenue was invested in a sovereign wealth fund, the Libyan Investment Authority (LIA), which was conservatively valued at $53 billion in June 2010. The United Nations Human Development Report 2010—a United Nations aggregate measure of health, education and income—ranked Libya as the 53rd most advanced country in the world for human development and as the most advanced country in Africa. Human rights remained limited by state repression of civil society and restrictions on freedom of assembly and expression."
Comment: In her effort to sully the valid questions asked in Al-Ahram, this article's author lost sight of the fact that the official narrative in Egypt, to date, on 9-11, the GWOT and ISIS is the same as the Western one. So she would have apparently had no concern with Egyptian reporting standards if one of that country's publications had not dared to publish valid questions about 9/11.
Incidentally, if you click on the headline and go to the source article at The Independent, you'll see that they conducted a poll of their readers...
Why is it that Western journalists are (generally) the last to hear the news? What practical use have they in society if their role is to retard rather than inform people?