Society's Child
While Pool attempted to engage West in a discussion about his recent, controversial dinner with former President Donald Trump, West insisted on airing his grievances against the Jewish people, who he kept referring to as "they," and claiming that he was a vessel of God, and that his children would be okay because his ex-wife is rich.
When Pool pressed back, saying "they have been extremely unfair to you," Kanye asked "who is 'they' though?" Pool said plainly that he meant the corporate press, but for West, "they" was a specific reference to the Jewish people, who he blames for his own downfall.
Nick Fuentes, who is persona non grata in virtually every circle but those who espouse racism and hatred, jumped in to offer his understanding that "they" were to blame, meaning Jews. In the brief conversation that did occur, it was confirmed that Donald Trump was unaware of who Fuentes was when they dined at Mar-a-Lago.
Pool pushed back, saying that he absolutely was not in agreement with these horrifying and despicable views. West, and his entourage, including the two men he brought with him to Mar-a-Lago on Thanksgiving, Milo Yiannopolous and Fuentes, left.
Pool was not particularly surprised, and spoke out against identitarianism. What Pool wanted to understand from West and his small crew were what went down at the dinner, and what West is considering in terms of a 2024 presidential run.
"I'm all about individualism, meritocracy, personal responsibility," Pool said. "That means an individual of any background can be capable of anything."
"If you live in a world where a single group of people is haunting you, you're trapped, you're not going to get out. The issue is you can overcome anything," Pool said.
Reader Comments
Psstoffgoy West spoke the fucking TRUTHDo you have any idea how ignorant you sound when you mindlessly categorize people like this? The Jewish religion does tend to foster a regressive and self-laudatory mindset. Like any other belief system (religious or otherwise), though, what an individual chooses to make of it runs the gamut of human potential. If you want to understand individual human behavior, you have to let individuals be in there somewhere, and that means opening your eyes and ears instead of your mouth.
That's the whole issue I have with "them" and "those jews." It also demands less of critical thinking to group others and blame the group rather than looking at the individuals, even if they are part of some grand conspiracy. The members of such a conspiracy might happen to have a common background, but every other person with that background is very likely ignorant of the conspiracy. And considering the common background of modern religions (the Pagan Continuity hypothesis), any religious group who thinks they are chosen or correct are promoting a simplistic and ignorant view of our past. "The Jews" are not after Ye. He was wronged by individuals, allegedly.
Artex [...]"The Jews" are not after Ye. He was wronged by individuals, allegedly.They all happen to be Jewish, and colluding to ruin him, what a coincidence.
If they're Italian, it's the mafia
If they're Jewish, it's a coincidence
Psstoffgoy [...] Pool is nothing more than a jew buzzard employed to bayonet the dead and make sure the bones are picked clean.I'm not so sure that he is just that, or that that is dead meat to bayonet. If it's his position on "Identitarianism" he wants to debate with Ye and Co., that's legitimate, and can be addressed. I think Ye is somewhat labile, but if someone can get his ear we can level the playing field on that score; there is a HUGE prong for the platform for the America First candidate waiting in the wings vis a vis a technocratic "Nudge" (tip o' the cap to Cass Sunstein) style subversion open air conspiracy.
"Pool 'pushed back' against his antisemitism"
—is used in virtually every report headline when I googled it. Dozens and dozens with almost exactly the same phrase
"don't mention 'the jews'. I mentioned it once, but I think I got away with it"
Having a conversation about “they” isn’t all that productive when one side is effectively a conservative “alternative” gatekeeper and the other consists of a batshit crazy hip hop artist and a couple social media star minions.
Would it not be more productive to eliminate the pointing of a finger at a particular group and rather point out the actions of an entire industry? Even if (and this would NEVER happen) you managed to convince enough people that it is in fact a vast Jewish conspiracy to control the narrative their removal wouldn’t change anything. There are plenty of Ivy League educated Boston Brahmins and WASP’s who’d be more than willing to take up the banner of authoritarianism.
What is it that renders the average person willing to spoon “news” gruel into their brains on a daily basis? The comforts of modern living. So long as the lights are on and the pantry is full most people will play along with this bullshit.
Simple Tim concedes, "They've been very unfair to you..."
Ye asks, "Who are they?"
Simple Tim replies, "Corporate media."
As Ye leaves Nick Fuentes begins to prod, "But they are, aren't they?"...
Too bad, given time it'd've been hashed out. Ye knew Simple Tim wanted the news first, as they'd had a discussion beforehand on how to structure the interview. But Simple Tim had his talking points prepared! When Ye sussed out that Simple Tim would not validate his basic experience, compounded lately by Pasternak and banking shenanigans, he left. Simple Tim went on to his talking points:
"I of course am not corporate media. I'm Simple Tim! You can be anything you want to be in life, kids! Just pull yourselves up by the bootstraps, like me: you can livestream a movement you then abandon to go corporate before getting established as controlled opo! Nevermind that there are wealthy colluding forces in a digitized world with little or no privacy. I think if I toe the line this way I can keep my platform... and buy more cool stuff to put on the wall."
Comment: Here's the full show: