OF THE
TIMES
The "big bang", only one of many, is a dissipative force the opposite of this force would probably be a controlled movement before a...
We can also bring the resonance/vibration realm border merging with our universe realm border line, down to the level scale of say Galaxies. A...
Wouldn't common sense dictate that Soros and any all evil minions he employs should be designated as terrorists and terrorist organizations? That...
This reads to me like a nuclear war is inevitable. Not a nice picture.
Of course. If it's real it's much more likely to be "debunked" by "experts". Didn't even bother to read this.
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2025 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Reader Comments
Does anyone recall that Jon Hansen, the FIRST POTUS, who ably handled the military's meltdown over financial negligence post Revolutionary War, was OPPOSED to that document--as was Benjamin Franklin, though he signed it anyway, and a host of others both in and outside the Convention? Does anyone care that the records show more people were opposed to Constitutions than those who managed to cram it down the throats of the citizenry, just like today with Lord Fauci, et al?
None of this political mendacity will end until citizens put away the baby propaganda fed them in Pub Ed, and learn what REALLY happened during the mid 1700s.
Merrill Jensen
Forest McDonald
Richard Rosenfeld
& etc.
The only thing that actually makes the Constitution remarkable is the idea of the Bill of Rights - and those principles are worth defending. Nevertheless, even the BoR is deficient as the faults in the Constitution have allowed gov't scumbags to render most of the substance of the articulated rights to be null and void in a de facto sense.
When they can invoke for themselves raises and grandfather clauses and immunities, it becomes the worthless scrap of paper Hamilton declared it was.
What Congress giveth it can take away when its not enough to ignore their own legislation.
The New Nation Merrill Jensen
E Pluribus Unum
Novus Ordo Seclorum
We the People; Forrest McDonald
American Aurora Richard Rosenfeld
The Anti-Federalist Papers
The Whiskey Rebellion Thomas Slaughter
The Constitution Convention Notes James Madison
These will keep you busy for a while
R.C.
Alien and Sedition Acts.
Institution of conscription during the War of Northern Aggression.
Imprisonment of Eugene Debs.
Prohibition.
National Firearms Act.
Wickard v. Filburn.
etc., etc., etc.
The drug war was not truly the "death blow", as the BOR had bled out and died a long time before. Just like the Patriot Act and similar, the drug war simply another beating applied to a dead horse.
But in terms of getting the modern idiot proles to go along with what was so obviously a violation of individual freedom (jail for a joint - contrast that to prohibition where they'd pour it out. Sure they hammered the rackets - that didn't pay the pigs, BUT Prohibition was ended.
As a 14 year old I would maintain to anyone that the whole Prohibition deal meant that the only way to outlaw particular 'drugs' was via another Amendment. (Given what I've heard about the Income Tax Amendment, I dare say that similar scams got Prohibition passed in the first place.) My viewpoint has never changed.
Without the drug war, which got people to go along with it because it was a FUCKING TV Commercial! Literally. Team FUKUSraHell/The PTB NEVER could have gotten away with their modern surveillance, monitoring, etc. which got folks used to being, ultimately, 'locked down.'
RC