OF THE
TIMES
And the next Zerohedge article smearing the other wing of the uniparty ... I feel the need to quote Mencken, again: โAs democracy is perfected,...
Now that Trump's public approval ratings are the worst of any president in US history ever, propaganda articles like this pop up on a daily basis....
I always find it strange how people won't go after the system which enabled (and arguably) created Fauci. That would cause too much change....
Rebranding in the works? The New (and 'improved') DNC? What's the play here? They're working up some kind of angle I'd guess.
Sensible commentary worth reading. I think a lot of people are in the same situation.
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE

Reader Comments
Does anyone recall that Jon Hansen, the FIRST POTUS, who ably handled the military's meltdown over financial negligence post Revolutionary War, was OPPOSED to that document--as was Benjamin Franklin, though he signed it anyway, and a host of others both in and outside the Convention? Does anyone care that the records show more people were opposed to Constitutions than those who managed to cram it down the throats of the citizenry, just like today with Lord Fauci, et al?
None of this political mendacity will end until citizens put away the baby propaganda fed them in Pub Ed, and learn what REALLY happened during the mid 1700s.
Merrill Jensen
Forest McDonald
Richard Rosenfeld
& etc.
The only thing that actually makes the Constitution remarkable is the idea of the Bill of Rights - and those principles are worth defending. Nevertheless, even the BoR is deficient as the faults in the Constitution have allowed gov't scumbags to render most of the substance of the articulated rights to be null and void in a de facto sense.
When they can invoke for themselves raises and grandfather clauses and immunities, it becomes the worthless scrap of paper Hamilton declared it was.
What Congress giveth it can take away when its not enough to ignore their own legislation.
The New Nation Merrill Jensen
E Pluribus Unum
Novus Ordo Seclorum
We the People; Forrest McDonald
American Aurora Richard Rosenfeld
The Anti-Federalist Papers
The Whiskey Rebellion Thomas Slaughter
The Constitution Convention Notes James Madison
These will keep you busy for a while
R.C.
Alien and Sedition Acts.
Institution of conscription during the War of Northern Aggression.
Imprisonment of Eugene Debs.
Prohibition.
National Firearms Act.
Wickard v. Filburn.
etc., etc., etc.
The drug war was not truly the "death blow", as the BOR had bled out and died a long time before. Just like the Patriot Act and similar, the drug war simply another beating applied to a dead horse.
But in terms of getting the modern idiot proles to go along with what was so obviously a violation of individual freedom (jail for a joint - contrast that to prohibition where they'd pour it out. Sure they hammered the rackets - that didn't pay the pigs, BUT Prohibition was ended.
As a 14 year old I would maintain to anyone that the whole Prohibition deal meant that the only way to outlaw particular 'drugs' was via another Amendment. (Given what I've heard about the Income Tax Amendment, I dare say that similar scams got Prohibition passed in the first place.) My viewpoint has never changed.
Without the drug war, which got people to go along with it because it was a FUCKING TV Commercial! Literally. Team FUKUSraHell/The PTB NEVER could have gotten away with their modern surveillance, monitoring, etc. which got folks used to being, ultimately, 'locked down.'
RC