OF THE
TIMES
"Any vaccine carries with it a risk" We knew, the rest...not so much. Its great to be abstract from the collateral damage. Consider a get well...
Dead internet theory. I'm a fan, have been for a while. It makes sense. A bit like the real world now-a-days. Dead-behind-the eyes people...
A picture paints a thousand words. Look at the photo featured in this article. Notice how all the puppets in the back are not smiling, uncertain,...
Meanwhile, researchers have also noted that large parts of the older web have been disappearing . Related: 'FAQ: Publishers Blocking the Wayback...
*chews in happy shark noises*
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE

Reader Comments
Does anyone recall that Jon Hansen, the FIRST POTUS, who ably handled the military's meltdown over financial negligence post Revolutionary War, was OPPOSED to that document--as was Benjamin Franklin, though he signed it anyway, and a host of others both in and outside the Convention? Does anyone care that the records show more people were opposed to Constitutions than those who managed to cram it down the throats of the citizenry, just like today with Lord Fauci, et al?
None of this political mendacity will end until citizens put away the baby propaganda fed them in Pub Ed, and learn what REALLY happened during the mid 1700s.
Merrill Jensen
Forest McDonald
Richard Rosenfeld
& etc.
The only thing that actually makes the Constitution remarkable is the idea of the Bill of Rights - and those principles are worth defending. Nevertheless, even the BoR is deficient as the faults in the Constitution have allowed gov't scumbags to render most of the substance of the articulated rights to be null and void in a de facto sense.
When they can invoke for themselves raises and grandfather clauses and immunities, it becomes the worthless scrap of paper Hamilton declared it was.
What Congress giveth it can take away when its not enough to ignore their own legislation.
The New Nation Merrill Jensen
E Pluribus Unum
Novus Ordo Seclorum
We the People; Forrest McDonald
American Aurora Richard Rosenfeld
The Anti-Federalist Papers
The Whiskey Rebellion Thomas Slaughter
The Constitution Convention Notes James Madison
These will keep you busy for a while
R.C.
Alien and Sedition Acts.
Institution of conscription during the War of Northern Aggression.
Imprisonment of Eugene Debs.
Prohibition.
National Firearms Act.
Wickard v. Filburn.
etc., etc., etc.
The drug war was not truly the "death blow", as the BOR had bled out and died a long time before. Just like the Patriot Act and similar, the drug war simply another beating applied to a dead horse.
But in terms of getting the modern idiot proles to go along with what was so obviously a violation of individual freedom (jail for a joint - contrast that to prohibition where they'd pour it out. Sure they hammered the rackets - that didn't pay the pigs, BUT Prohibition was ended.
As a 14 year old I would maintain to anyone that the whole Prohibition deal meant that the only way to outlaw particular 'drugs' was via another Amendment. (Given what I've heard about the Income Tax Amendment, I dare say that similar scams got Prohibition passed in the first place.) My viewpoint has never changed.
Without the drug war, which got people to go along with it because it was a FUCKING TV Commercial! Literally. Team FUKUSraHell/The PTB NEVER could have gotten away with their modern surveillance, monitoring, etc. which got folks used to being, ultimately, 'locked down.'
RC