Last Saturday, Rachel Maddow tweeted an article from the
Washington Post decrying the fact that YouTube's algorithm had recommended a video from RT in searches for videos about the Mueller Report. "YouTube recommended one video source hundreds of thousands of times to viewers seeking information, a watchdog says: RT, the global media operation funded by the Russian government." Maddow appended the tweet with the phrase "Death by algorithm".
The 'controversial'
video in question is an interview Chris Hedges did with Aaron Maté - so, between two award-winning journalists (Hedges was awarded a Pulitzer, Maté an Izzy Award, specifically for his reporting on 'Russiagate') - whose collective journalistic weight dwarfs Maddow's 'Alex-Jones-of-the-Left conspiracy theories', by several orders of magnitude. The idea that YouTube should not be recommending this kind of high-caliber discussion, 'because Russians', is simplistic and reactionary.
Maté, understandably, took issue with this mischaracterization. In response he
provided a "thread offering a sample of the falsehoods, innuendo, and propaganda that [Maddow] has aired on her top-rated cable news show". Strap in, this is epic.
Here's the thread unrolled via
Thread Reader.
"Deliberate trafficking in unreality" is exactly right. If anyone ever needed any evidence that Maddow is little more than a rabid liar, obsessed with non-existent 'Russian interference' and pushing propaganda on her equally delusional fan base, this is it. As journalist
Michael Tracey said,
"If the YouTube algorithm should be criticized for promoting anybody, it's Rachel Maddow, given the many provable lies and deceptions she's fed her audience." Why anyone still listens to this woman is truly one of the mysteries of our times.
Doug DiPasquale is a Holistic Nutritionist, Paleo enthusiast and health journalist living in Toronto, Canada. He's a regular contributor for SOTT.net, Dot Connector Magazine, the Huffington Post Canada, The Food Network Canada and has contributed to many other blogs and online publications. He's passionate about the food we eat, exposing the lies and faulty thinking of the "food police" and informing the public about how to eat real food, ie. replacing that wheatgrass shot with bacon.
Is there any doubt that Maddow's hysteria was catalyzed primarily through the lens of her experience as a gay woman? Few other high profile talking heads on the Left went quite that spectacularly barmy. She was primed and ready to go the extra crazy mile exactly because she was packing extra emotional baggage. Facing one's errors and fears is already hard enough.
I remember thinking, back during that Pussy Riot hysteria during the Sochi 2014 Winter Olympics, "Damn! Some bright spark in some psyops division is getting high marks for cooking up that ploy! A rising star! Keep your eye on that one!"
Though, as the drama unfolded over the next four years, it appears that it may be a standard programming chore; probably used on many more worlds than just ours when the time comes to land your troops in the soul invasion. Step 5 or 6 in setting up your global conquest DIY kit. "Do NOT insert tab A into slot B."
Sex, after all, is designed to ignite all the core emotional thunder toward forced learning. It's easy to avoid facing the tics and snags in your dirty machine; you can just walk away if somebody triggers your bullshit. But when you're dragged along by the mighty desire to love and fuck and cuddle and not be alone.., gay or straight, you wind up bonded to a person who will be one of your greatest teachers in life! Running away from hard lessons becomes much more difficult when you are in love. What a great system!
So of course the Dark Side is going to gleefully pervert and sabotage this sacred tree in the soul forest and turn it into an infernal engine to serve nihilism.
Not weaponizing it would be foolish. -From an evil empire perspective.
How are you going to activate the Rachel Maddows of the world otherwise? People like her are too smart and wily to bring down by anything other than the nuclear option of emotional levers.