The video, produced by skywatcher SonOfMaBarker, is the result of painstakingly poring over magnified images of the Moon provided by NASA. The researcher claims the discovery is so explosive, the space agency will soon be trying to airbrush away the findings.
Looking at the evidence is quite persuasive. There are indeed formations on the Moon which resemble man-made objects, such as landing fields, monuments and buildings.
In one startling image, it seems as though a ring of towers encircles a lunar crater's edge. It certainly doesn't look like a random, naturally occurring formation. In another, the side of a crater appears similar to structures on Earth like the Pyramids of Giza.
Set to a spooky soundtrack and lacking any narration, the viewer is asked to make up their own minds. Whether a flight of imagination, or some real UFO artifacts and alien technology, the video is very compelling for its dogged investigation.
Here's the video:
Reader Comments
I think he is referring to the camera.
It takes cause to make lines and right angles on a spheroidal or oblate surface. Natural lines can be due to ridging (tectonics), but you'd be hard pressed to find evidence beyond parallel ridges with angle deflections. A single line can be an impact scar (rays), like the crater Tycho on the Moon. You would know this by other rays that converge on the scene of the impact.
What you should not see is examples of complex structures with right angles and pyramids, or symmetrical halves of facial forms. That's not going to happen. Craft is at work if these images are accurate, using skilled hands at the megalithic scale. Nature is much too varied and inconsistent for such works at regular intervals.
There is plenty to think about, and plenty of imaging work to be done.
Joseph Skipper has been describing tampered Mars images tirelessly at his site Marsanomalyresearch.com. He has also posted tampered images of the Moon and even Antarctica-- Go figure.
Point Hubble at Moon
As I understand, it was first said that it would damage its lens(es) or such. However, as I also understand, it was later used to take a few pictures of the moon fully lit.
If these be on the Moon's far side, Hubble still sees parts we can't due to its altitude.
R.C.
Spoke about this on July 5, 2008 in a 90-minute presentation called "Dark Mission: The Secret History of NASA". Those interested might want to check it out. Can't guarantee the accuracy of all he says but he raises some interesting question, nevertheless.
He says the pyramids on the moon are made of glass and claims that NASA follows Masonic rituals.
Many observers have detailed anomalous structures or phenomenon on the moon or mars. What makes this more suspicious is the widespread tampering, smudging and obfuscation of official images. This includes earth satellite pictures. The problem with image tampering is that it's not hard to see. Whatever is being concealed is successfully hidden but the act itself draws attention. What's the alternative? No images at all? Low resolution images? Trying to fake alternative detail? If any of these options were viable they would certainly have been tried. There's just too many curious things that shouldn't be somewhere to cover it all up.
People can argue all they like about this or that anomaly but systematic image tampering means 'keep on digging, folks'.