© AP Photo / Inset via TwitterThe Richards family home in the Dorchester neighborhood of Boston where 8-year-old Martin Richards (inset) lived.
Killing Americans at play resonates differently than attacks on economic and military targets.Call it "terrorism" if a label helps you make sense of this madness. Find who did it and squash him - or them - with what President Obama called "the full weight of justice." But in the broad scheme of things, such loose ends matter less than this: Life in America changed with the Boston Marathon bombings - again, and as with past attacks, for the much worse.
The Oklahoma City bombing in April 1995 and the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks were knee-buckling blows that led to an obsession over domestic security and foreign wars that will mark - and mar - our generation. The last mass terrorist assault on U.S. soil was carried out by Maj. Nidal M. Hassan, an Army psychiatrist with loose connections to al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, who fatally shot 13 people and wounded 30 more at Fort Hood, Texas, in November 2009.
There were attacks thwarted by the swelling ranks of federal police: The so-called shoe bomber, Richard Reid; an attempt to bomb the New York City subway system in 2009; and an unexploded car bomb in Times Square in 2010.
Boston is another bridge too far. The Boston Marathon and its competitors reflect the best of America - always striving, forever resilient, and, as measured by population and cultural significance, enormous.
You might say it's unfair to compare Boston's relatively low death toll to 9/11 and Oklahoma City, much less to the thousands of casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as the daily total of gun deaths on U.S. streets.
But the Boston attack is notable not for the number of deaths, but for its social significance. It's one thing - a dastardly, evil thing - to strike symbols of economic and military power. It's another to hit the heart of America. Death at the finish line in Boston makes every place (and everybody) less secure.
Comment: Very interesting indeed. So the 'extremist websites' Tamerlan was visiting were not 'al_qaeda_forever.aol.com' and such nonsense set up by the CIA and the FBI to entrap young Muslims... he was merely broadening his mind by visiting websites in the alt.net community.
Also, by acknowledging that he had no ties to terrorist groups, the US govt recognises that his 'conversion to Islam' was irrelevant - the point is that Tamerlan 'converted' to Truth.
We wonder to what extent Tamerlan was aware of the ways of 'The Beast'? Surely he was not naive to the FB-Lie's entrapment of young Muslims into fake terror plots?
In light of this, it seems highly unlikely that he willingly participated in this terror 'drill'-turned-real deal.
An oft-used tactic in Israeli 'suicide bombings' is to coerce the young Palestinian into being in a certain place at a certain time by threatening that failure to do so would result in harm being visited on their families. Tamerlan leaves behind a wife and three-year-old daughter...