© Unknown
Although it is encouraging that the Royal Society now acknowledges that climate science may not be as settled as it previously implied, the Society's new report still stands as an embarrassment to science because it fails to offer justifications based on science (and policy analysis) for a number of its (politically correct) statements.
First, it claims in its opening sentence, "Changes in climate have significant implications for present lives, for future generations and for ecosystems on which humanity depends." But two paragraphs later it acknowledges that, "[T]he impacts of climate change ... are not considered here." Hence, the RS has no scientific (or other basis) for this claim. At most it could say, "ALTHOUGH WE DID NOT CONSIDER THEIR IMPACTS, changes in climate COULD have significant implications for present lives..., IF SUCH CHANGES ARE VERY LARGE." [Suggested INSERTIONS in the RS's original language are in UPPERCASE letters.]
Comment: The cracks in the facade are appearing when even the Royal Society expresses some uncertainty about climate change. They still cannot quite bring themselves to actually bite the hand that feeds them through research grants, but they are slowly moving closer to admitting that climate change is not man made.