
A handful of newspapers say they won't run next week's series, while several others said the strips will move from the comics to opinion pages or websites only. Many already publish the strip by cartoonist Garry Trudeau, whose sarcastic swipes at society's foibles have a history of giving headaches to newspaper editors, on editorial pages.
"We run 'Doonesbury' on our op-ed page, and this series is an example of why," said David Averill, editorial page editor for the Tulsa World. "Many of our readers will disagree with the political stance the series takes, and some will be offended by the clinical language. I believe, however, that this series of strips is appropriate to the abortion debate and appropriate to our op-ed pages."
Comment: Where to begin? This story is completely backward from the reality on the ground.
"Israel is not keen to see an escalation [while escalating things], Israel is not keen to hurt innocents [while innocents are being killed], Israel is absolutely opposed to this [while doing exactly what it claims to be opposed to]."
"For now [while doing exactly what it is implying it is not doing].."
The whole article can be seen line for line that Israel is (made to appear as) the victim, when in fact the people of Gaza have been the victims of Israel for years.
The Image: Look closely - Where is the hole from where the alleged rocket hit? How is pouring air on a back tire that is not burning helping stop a non-fire? Why are there no other signs of damage, broken windows on buildings, other forms of debris, burn marks..? Why is there no large group of civilians in the background, but only men in yellow vests and a few camera people, vs. the hordes you'd find during any police/medical situation in a populated area?