A judge has warned that he will limit the "graphic, sexual questions" in a case against convicted sex offender and child predator Jeffrey Epstein.When a convicted sex offender appears in court over a lawsuit filed on behalf of three of the many women he assaulted when they were young girls, it is assumed that his actions will be examined in detail, and the content will be graphic.
However, in the case of a lawsuit filed against billionaire Wall Street hedge fund manager
Jeffrey Epstein, 64, the judge presiding over it has declared that when it comes to
"graphic, sexual questions, the likelihood is that I will not allow them into evidence."Palm Beach County Circuit Judge Donald Hafele already ruled in favor of
Epstein when he agreed to delay the next hearing in the 8-year-old civil lawsuit until March 2018, according to a
report from the
Palm Beach Post. Now, the idea that he won't allow
"graphic, sexual questions" in a lawsuit over sexual misconduct is ludicrous.
Comment: The winner(s): the women of #MeToo. Which just demonstrates how pervasive social hysteria can be. That's not to say there's nothing to the issue, however. Some of the accusations are pretty serious. For example, the TIME piece on the winners describes Selma Blair's story: But there are problems with the whole movement too. How many of the accusations are false or misleading? What are the consequences of lumping all of the accused together, when guilt has not been established? And is it really helpful to include serious allegations side by side others that amount to littler more than potentially inappropriate behavior or language (like "talking about sex" in front of someone)?
While #MeToo was TIME's choice, their readers picked Mohammed bin Salman, who scored 24% of the vote. (#MeToo came in second, with 6%.)