Comment: $13 billion might seem like a lot of money to us little people, but did you notice that at no time was it suggested that anyone go to prison for causing a crisis whose true cost probably hits the $1 quadrillion mark, and which we the people have been forced to pay?

Comment: Israel and Saudi Arabia are two countries, who vehemently opposes Shiites, Iran, Syria and Hezbollah. Both Israel and Saudi Arabia are keen to split the unity between shiites and weaken the alliance between Iran, Syria and Hezbollah. Civil wars in those 3 countries would be on top of their favorite list of wet dreams.

Remember Israel and Saudi Arabia are just so keen to promote tyranny democracy just like you see it in their own countries.

Comment: Is there a purge going on?

Obama purging military commanders
Vice Adm. Tim Giardina fired as no. 2 nuclear commander
Another one? US fires general Michael Carey in charge of nuclear missiles

Comment: When Krugman writes, "if our economy has a persistent tendency toward depression, we're going to be living under the looking-glass rules of depression economics - in which virtue is vice and prudence is folly, in which attempts to save more (including attempts to reduce budget deficits) make everyone worse off - for a long time. I know that many people just hate this kind of talk. It offends their sense of rightness, indeed their sense of morality. Economics is supposed to be about making hard choices (at other people's expense, naturally). It's not supposed to be about persuading people to spend more," he puts his finger on the para-moralism of economics today: debt is sinful, people should "learn to do without," we have to pay the piper, and so on. But isn't this a misapplication of personal morality to the management of the global economy? If deficit spending by governments is the only way to spark demand, what is wrong with doing just that, especially at a time when the interest rates on government bonds are near zero? It's more of an engineering problem than a moral issue, and to inject personal morality into the debate only clouds the issue. Perhaps the interests of the pathocratic elite in impoverishing the public has something to do with the dissemination of the para-moral arguments.

As Andrew Lobaczewski, who coined the term 'para-moralism', wrote in Political Ponerology, "Para-moralistic statements and suggestions so often accompany various kinds of evil that they seem quite irreplaceable. Unfortunately, it has become a frequent phenomenon for individuals, oppressive groups, or patho-political systems to invent ever-new moral criteria for someone's convenience." For further explanation of the role of para-moralism in pathocratic regimes see, this link.