In a surprising turn of events, Russia struck back at the US and the western media disinformation campaign,
causing NATO to back off from claiming that Russia or Syria was responsible for the attack on the Red Crescent aid convoy destroyed earlier this week. This became evident after the public statement of NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg on Wednesday, September 21, in comments to media
following an ad-hoc meeting with Russian FM Sergei Lavrov.
Western media outlets previously reported, both through AP and Reuters distributors like the
New York Times,
LA Times, etc., as well as the UK's
Guardian and BBC, that US officials laid the blame on Russia for the attack on the Red Crescent aid convoy in Syria. The attack destroyed nearly twenty of the thirty-one trucks scheduled to arrive in Uram Al-Kubra.
Reuters apparently broke the US version of events, duplicitously citing
two conveniently anonymous military sources, claiming that:
"Two Russian Sukhoi SU-24 warplanes were in the skies above an aid convoy in Syria at the precise time it was struck on Monday, two U.S. officials told Reuters on Tuesday, citing U.S. intelligence that has led them to conclude Russia was to blame." - Reuters, September 19th, 2016.
The same article went on to claim in conclusion that: "The strike appeared to deal a fatal blow to Syria's fragile week-old ceasefire."
Comment: Heh. Poroshenko is pretty much reviled all-around by everyone. Evil enough to perpetuate a low-level war with Donbass and kill innocents of his own country (evoking the ire of Russia and all identified culturally with Russia in Ukraine) - but not quite evil and crazy enough for his Western masters to go the full distance as the article states. And this is to say nothing of his own people who now recognize how much of an incompetent and power-hungry buffoon this jackass of a leader is. Why couldn't he just stick to making chocolates?