OF THE
TIMES
When issues of global concern do not pose a direct threat to the United States, when such issues are at stake โ when crises arise that stir our conscience or push the world in a more dangerous direction but do not directly threaten us โ then the threshold for military action must be higher. In such circumstances, we should not go it alone. Instead, we must mobilize allies and partners to take collective action.So: 'we' didn't achieve these things only on our own, but instead in alliance with the royals of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Kuwait, and other friendly countries, which finance jihadists everywhere but in their own country. And, of course, all of 'us' are allied against Russia, so we're now surrounding that country with 'our' NATO partners before we do to it what we've previously done to Iraq, Libya, Yemen, and Syria. America is becoming even more ambitious, because of 'successes' like these in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, and Ukraine.
We have to broaden our tools to include diplomacy and development; sanctions and isolation; appeals to international law; and, if just, necessary and effective, multilateral military action. In such circumstances, we have to work with others because collective action in these circumstances is more likely to succeed.
Comment: The UK appears to be gearing up its military: UK ready to grow defense budget even further for new $240 million naval gun but will it work? UK begs US to hurry F-35 deal through while Royal Navy's next-gen frigate 'delayed indefinitely'